If I had ordered his assassination I should have
been his killer, but if I had refrained others from killing him
I would have been his helper. The position was that he who helped
him cannot now say that he is better than the one who deserted
him while he who deserted him cannot say that he is better than
the one who helped him. I am putting before you his case. He appropriated
(wealth) and did it badly. You protested against it and committed
excess therein. With Allah lies the real verdict between the appropriator
and the protester.
(1). `Uthman is the
first Umayyad Caliph of Islam who ascended the Caliphate on the
1st Muharram, 24 A.H. at the age of seventy and after having wielded
full control and authority over the affairs of the Muslims for
twelve years was killed at their hands on the 18th Dhi'l-hijjah,
35 A.H. and buried at Hashsh Kawkab.
This fact cannot be denied that `Uthman's killing
was the result of his weaknesses and the black deeds of his officers,
otherwise, there is no reason that Muslims should have unanimously
agreed on killing him while no one except a few persons of his
house stood up to support and defend him. Muslims would have certainly
given consideration to his age, seniority, prestige and distinction
of companionship of the Prophet but his ways and deeds had so
marred the atmosphere that no one seemed prepared to sympathise
and side with him. The oppression and excesses perpetrated on
high ranking companions of the Prophet had roused a wave of grief
and anger among the Arab tribes. Everyone was infuriated and looked
at his haughtiness and wrong doings with disdainful eyes. Thus,
due to Abu Dharr's disgrace, dishonour and exile Banu Ghifar and
their associate tribes, due to `Abdullah ibn Mas`ud's merciless
beating Banu Hudhayl and their associates, due to breaking of
the ribs of `Ammar ibn Yasir, Banu Makhzum and their associates
Banu Zuhrah, and due to the plot for the killing of Muhammad ibn
Abi Bakr, Banu Taym all had a storm of rage in their hearts. The
Muslims of other cities were also brimful of complaints at the
hands of his officers who under intoxication of wealth and the
effects of luxury did whatever they wished and crushed whomever
they wanted. They had no fear of punishment from the centre nor
apprehension of any enquiry. People were fluttering to get out
of their talons of oppression but no one was ready to listen to
their cries of pain and restlessness; feelings of hatred were
rising but no care was taken to put them down. The companions
of the Prophet were also sick of him as they saw that peace was
destroyed, administration was topsy turvy and Islam's features
were being metamorphosed. The poor and the starving were craving
for dried crusts while Banu Umayyah were rolling in wealth. The
Caliphate had become a handle for belly-filling and a means of
amassing wealth. Consequently, they too did not lag behind in
preparing the ground for killing him. Rather, it was at their
letters and messages that people from Kufah, Basrah and Egypt
had collected in Medina. Observing this behaviour of the people
of Medina, `Uthman wrote to Mu`awiyah:
So now, certainly the people of Medina have turned
heretics, have turned faith against obedience and broken the (oath
of) allegiance. So you send to me the warriors of Syria on brisk
and sturdy horses.
The policy of action adopted by Mu`awiyah on receipt
of this letter also throws light on the condition of the companions.
Historian at-Tabari writes after this:
When the letter reached Mu`awiyah he pondered over
it and considered it bad to openly oppose the companions of the
Prophet since he was aware of their unanimity.
In view of these circumstances to regard the killing
of `Uthman as a consequence of merely enthusiasm and temporary
feelings and to hurl it at some insurgents is to veil the fact,
since all the factors of his opposition existed within Medina
itself, while those coming from without had collected for seeking
redress of their grievances at their call. Their aim was only
improvement of the position, not killing or bloodshed. If their
complaints had been heard then the occasion for this bloodshed
would not have arisen.
What happened was that when, having been disgusted
with the oppression and excesses of `Abdullah ibn Sa`d ibn Abi
Sarh, who was foster brother of `Uthman, the people of Egypt proceeded
towards Medina and camped in the valley of Dhakhushub near the
city. They sent a man with a letter to `Uthman and demanded that
oppression should be stopped, the existing ways should be changed
and repentance should be offered for the future. But instead of
giving a reply `Uthman got this man turned out of the house and
did not regard their demands worth attention. On this these people
entered the city to raise their voice against this pride and haughtiness,
and complained to the people of this behaviour besides other excesses.
On the other side many people from Kufah and Basrah had also arrived
with their complaints and they, after joining these ones, proceeded
forward with the backing of the people of Medina and confined
`Uthman within his house, although there was no restriction on
his going and coming to the mosque. But in his sermon on the very
first Friday he severely rebuked these people and even held them
accursed, whereupon people got infuriated and threw pebbles at
him as a result of which he lost control and fell from the pulpit.
After a few days his coming and going to the mosque was also banned.
When `Uthman saw matters deteriorating to this extent
he implored Amir al-mu'minin very submissively to find some way
for his rescue and to disperse the people in whatever way he could.
Amir al-mu'minin said, "On what terms can I ask them to leave
when their demands are justified?" `Uthman said, "I
authorise you in this matter. Whatever terms you would settle
with them I would be bound by them." So Amir al-mu'minin
went and met the Egyptians and talked to them. They consented
to get back on the condition that all the tyrannies should be
wiped off and Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr be made governor by removing
Ibn Abi Sarh. Amir al-mu'minin came back and put their demand
before `Uthman who accepted it without any hesitation and said
that to get over these excesses time was required. Amir al-mu'minin
pointed out that for matters concerning Medina delay had no sense.
However, for other places so much time could be allowed that the
Caliph's message could reach them. `Uthman insisted that for Medina
also three days were needed. After discussion with the Egyptians
Amir al-mu'minin agreed to it also and took all the responsibility
thereof upon himself. Then they dispersed at his suggestion. Some
of them went to Egypt with Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr while some went
to the valley of Dhakhushub and stayed there and this whole matter
ended. On the second day of this event Marwan ibn al-Hakam said
to `Uthman, "It is good, these people have gone, but to stop
people coming from other cities you should issue a statement so
that they should not come this way and sit quiet at their places
and that statement should be that some people collected in Medina
on hearing some irresponsible talk but when they came to know
that whatever they heard was wrong they were satisfied and have
gone back." `Uthman did not want to speak such a clear lie
but Marwan convinced him and he agreed, and speaking in the Holy
Prophet's mosque, he said:
These Egyptians had received some news about their
Caliph and when satisfied that they were all baseless and wrong
they went back to their cities.
No sooner he said this than there was great hue and
cry in the mosque, and people began to shout to `Uthman, "Offer
repentance, fear Allah; what is this lie you are uttering?"
`Uthman was confused in this commotion and had to offer repentance.
Consequently, he turned to the Ka`bah, moaned in the audience
of Allah and returned to his house.
Probably after this very event Amir al-mu'minin advised
`Uthman that, "You should openly offer repentance about your
past misdeeds so that these uprisings should subside for good
otherwise if tomorrow people of some other place come you will
again cling to my neck to rid you of them." Consequently,
he delivered a speech in the Prophet's mosque wherein admitting
his mistakes he offered repentance and swore to remain careful
in future. He told the people that when he alighted from the pulpit
their representatives should meet him, and he would remove their
grievances and meet their demands. On this people acclaimed this
action of his and washed away their ill-feelings with tears to
a great extent. When he reached his house after finishing from
here Marwan sought permission to say something but `Uthman's wife
Na'ilah bint Farafisah intervened. Turning to Marwan she said,
"For Allah's sake you keep quiet. You would say only such
a thing as would bring but death to him." Marwan took it
ill and retorted, "You have no right to interfere in these
matters. You are the daughter of that very person who did not
know till his death how to perform ablution." Na'ilah replied
with fury, "You are wrong, and are laying a false blame.
Before uttering anything about my father you should have cast
a glance on the features of your father. But for the consideration
of that old man I would have spoken things at which people would
have shuddered but would have confirmed every such word."
When `Uthman saw the conversation getting prolonged he stopped
them and asked Marwan to tell him what he wished.
Marwan said, "What is it you have said in the
mosque, and what repentance you have offered? In my view sticking
to the sin was a thousand times better than this repentance because
however much the sins may multiply there is always scope for repentance,
but repentance by force is no repentance. You have said what you
have but now see the consequences of this open announcement, that
crowds of people are at your door. Now go forward and fulfil their
demands." `Uthman then said, "Well, I have said what
I have said, now you deal with these people. It is not in my power
to deal with them." Consequently, finding out his implied
consent Marwan came out and addressing the people spoke out, "Why
have you assembled here? Do you intend to attack or to ransack?
Remember, you cannot easily snatch away power from our hands,
take out the idea from your hearts that you would subdue us. We
are not to be subdued by anyone. Take away your black faces from
here. Allah may disgrace and dishonour you."
When people noticed this changed countenance and
altered picture they rose from there full of anger and rage and
went straight to Amir al-mu'minin and related to him the whole
story. On hearing it Amir al-mu'minin was infuriated and immediately
went to `Uthman and said to him, "Good Heavens. How badly
you have behaved with the Muslims. You have forsaken faith for
the sake of a faithless and characterless man and have lost all
wit. At least you should have regard and consideration for your
own promise. What is this that at Marwan's betokening you have
set off with folded eyes. Remember he will throw you in such a
dark well that you will never be able to come out of it. You have
become the carrier animal of Marwan so that he can ride on you
howsoever he desires and put you on whatever wrong way he wishes.
In future I shall never intervene in your affair nor tell people
anything. Now you should manage your own affairs."
Saying all this Amir al-mu'minin got back and Na'ilah
got the chance, she said to `Uthman, "Did I not tell you
to get rid of Marwan otherwise he would put such a stain on you
that it would not be removed despite all effort. Well, what is
the good in following the words of one who is without any respect
among the people and low before their eyes. Make `Ali agree otherwise
remember that restoring the disturbed state of affairs is neither
within your power nor in that of Marwan." `Uthman was impressed
by this and sent a man after Amir al-mu'minin but he refused to
meet him. There was no siege around `Uthman but shame deterred
him. With what face could he come out of the house? But there
was no way without coming out. Consequently, he came out quietly
in the gloom of night and reaching Amir al-mu'minin's place, he
moaned his helplessness and loneliness, offered excuses, and also
assured him of keeping promises but Amir al-mu'minin said, "You
make a promise in the Prophet's mosque standing before all the
people but it is fulfilled in this way that when people go to
you they are rebuked and even abuses are hurled at them. When
this is the state of your undertakings which the world has seen,
then how and on what ground can I trust any word of yours in future.
Do not have any expectation from me now. I am not prepared to
accept any responsibility on your behalf. The tracks are open
before you. Adopt whichever way you like and tread whatever track
you choose." After this talk `Uthman came back and began
blaming Amir al-mu'minin in retort to the effect that all the
disturbances were rising at his instance and that he was not doing
anything despite being able to do everything.
On this side the result of repentance was as it was.
Now let us see the other side. When after crossing the border
of Hijaz, Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr reached the place Aylah on the
coast of the Red Sea people caught sight of a camel rider who
was making his camel run so fast as though the enemy was chasing
him. These people had some misgivings about him and therefore
called him and enquired who he was. He said he was the slave of
`Uthman. They enquired wherefore he was bound. He said Egypt.
They enquired to whom he was going. He replied to the Governor
of Egypt. People said that the Governor of Egypt was with them.
To whom was he going then? He said he was to go to Ibn Abi Sarh.
People asked him if any letter was with him. He denied. They asked
for what purpose he was going. He said he did not know that. One
of these people thought that his clothes should be searched. So
the search was made, but nothing was found on
him. Kinanah ibn Bishr at-Tujibi said, "See
his water-skin." People said, "Leave him, how can there
be a letter in water! Kinanah said, "You do not know what
cunning these people play. " Consequently, the water-skin
was opened and seen. There was a lead pipe in it wherein was a
letter. When it was opened and read, the Caliph's order in it
was that "When Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr and his party reaches
you then from among them kill so and so, arrest so and so, and
put so and so in jail, but you remain on your post." On reading
this all were stunned and thus began to look at one another in
astonishment.
A Persian hemistich says:
Mind was just burst in astonishment as to what
wonder it was!
Now proceeding forward was riding into the mouth
of death, consequently they returned to Medina taking the slave
with them. Reaching there they placed that letter before all the
companions of the Prophet. Whoever heard this incident remained
stunned with astonishment, and there was no one who was not abusing
`Uthman. Afterwards a few companions went to `Uthman along with
these people, and asked whose seal was there on this letter. He
replied that it was his own. They enquired whose writing it was.
He said it was his secretary's. They enquired whose slave was
that man. He replied that it was his. They enquired whose riding
beast it was. He replied that it was that of the Government. They
enquired who had sent it. He said he had no knowledge of it. People
then said, "Good Heavens. Everything is yours but you do
not know who had sent it. If you are so helpless, you leave this
Caliphate and get off from it so that such a man comes who can
administer the affairs of the Muslims." He replied, "It
is not possible that I should put off the dress of Caliphate which
Allah has put on me. Of course, I would offer repentance."
The people said, "Why should you speak of repentance which
has already been flouted on the day when Marwan was representing
you on your door, and whatever was wanting has been made up by
this letter. Now we are not going to be duped into these bluffs.
Leave the Caliphate and if our brethren stand in our way we will
hold them up; but if they prepare for fighting we too will fight.
Neither our hands are stiff nor our swords blunt. If you regard
all Muslims equally and uphold justice hand over Marwan to us
to enable us to enquire from him on whose strength and support
he wanted to play with the precious lives of Muslims by writing
this letter." But he rejected this demand and refused to
hand over Marwan to them, whereupon people said that the letter
had been written at his behest.
However, improving conditions again deteriorated
and they ought to have deteriorated because despite lapse of the
required time every thing was just as it had been and not a jot
of difference had occurred. Consequently, the people who had stayed
behind in the valley of Dhakhushub to watch the result of repentance
again advanced like a flood and spread over the streets of Medina,
and closing the borders from every side surrounded his house.
During these days of siege a companion of the Prophet,
Niyar ibn `Iyad desired to talk to `Uthman, went to his house
and called him. When he peeped out from the above he said, "O'
`Uthman, for Allah's sake give up this Caliphate and save Muslims
from this bloodshed." While he was just conversing, one of
`Uthman's men aimed at him with an arrow and killed him, whereupon
people were infuriated and shouted that Niyar's killer should
be handed over to them. `Uthman said it was not possible that
he would hand over his own support to them. This stubbornness
worked like a fan on fire and in the height of fury people set
fire to his door and began advancing for entering, when Marwan
ibn al-Hakam, Sa`id ibn al-`As and Mughirah ibn al-Akhnas together
with their contingents pounced upon the besiegers and killing
and bloodshed started at his door. People wanted to enter the
house but they were being pushed back. In the meanwhile, `Amr
ibn Hazm al-Ansari whose house was adjacent to that of `Uthman
opened his door and shouted for advancing from that side. Thus
through this house the besiegers climbed on the roof of `Uthman's
house and descending down from there drew their swords. Only a
few scuffles had taken place when all except people of `Uthman's
house, his well-wishers and Banu Umayyah ran away in the streets
of Medina and a few hid themselves in the house of Umm Habibah
bint Abi Sufyan (Mu`awiyah's sister) the rest were killed with
`Uthman defending him to the last. (at-Tabaqat, Ibn Sa`d,
vol. 3, Part 1, pp. 50-58; at-Tabari, vol. 1, pp. 2998-3025; al-Kamil,
Ibn al-Athir, vol. 3, pp. 167-180; Ibn Abi'l-Hadid, vol. 2, pp.
144-161).
At his killing several poets wrote elegies. A couplet
from the elegy by Abu Hurayrah is presented:
Today people have only one grief but I have two
griefs - the loss of my money bag and the killing of `Uthman.
After observing these events the stand of Amir al-mu'minin
becomes clear, namely that he was neither supporting the group
that was instigating at `Uthman's killing nor can be included
in those who stood for his support and defence but when he saw
that what was said was not acted upon he kept himself aloof.
When both the parties are looked at then among the
people who had raised their hands off from `Uthman's support are
seen `A'ishah, and according to the popular versions (which is
not right) the then living persons out of the ten Pre-informed
ones (who had been pre-informed in this world by the Prophet for
their being admitted in Paradise), out of those who took part
in the consultative committee (formed for `Uthman's selection
for Caliphate), ansar, original muhajirun, people
who took part in the battle of Badr and other conspicuous and
dignified individuals, while on the side (of Uthman) are seen
only a few slaves of the Caliph and a few individuals from Banu
Umayyah. If people like Marwan and Sa`id ibn al-`As cannot be
given precedence over the original muhajirun their actions
too cannot be given precedence over the actions of the latter.
Again, if ijma` (consensus of opinion) is not meant for
particular occasions only then it would be difficult to question
this overwhelming unanimity of the companions.