|
Attention: Year 2009 is here
Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ali Sina
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 4607
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:38 pm Post subject: Yamin Zakaria on Gender Equality |
|
|
Mr. Zakaria wrote this article and he sent it to various Islamic sites (including mine) for publication. Please read it to peer into the twisted mind of a Muslim fanatic
It is funny that some Muslim women insist that in Islam there is gender equality. Mr. Yamin Zakaria makes it clear that this is not true.
However, to justify the superiority of man over woman he uses a very circular reasoning.
He says men are superior because they could dominate women throughout the history.
Because of that women have had less opportunity to excel (he does not mention this part)
So because it is established that men are superior to women, men must dominate women and take away their rights.
You can use this circular reasoning for everything. The same "logic" was used to justify racism.
"Blacks are not as smart as white because they are slaves and the whites are masters."
The stupidity of this reasoning is self evident. It is like tying the hands of a person and then saying "look, he is incapable of using his hands".
What a sick mind!
| Quote: |
Idiocy of Gender Equality: The Case of the Woman Imam
By Yamin Zakaria
With the exception of the very few Prophetesses mentioned in the Old Testament, all the messengers of God mentioned in the Abrahamic religious (Islam, Christianity and Judaism) texts are male. Islam does not even make any references to any Prophetess. Furthermore, the founders and the early pioneers of all the other major religions are also predominantly male. If there is such a thing as gender equality then why would a just God deprive womankind of their share of Prophethood?
Therefore, those who have their faith in gender equality that is rooted in feminism which forms part of the current secular values would naturally conclude that religions are man-made: synthetic. But this conclusion also in turn raises another question, why men have been so successful in dominating women, shaping history, society and civilisations? So, one may argue that known human history actually demonstrates the non-existence of gender equality. It is a recent invention by some idealists; in contrast, religions have always existed throughout human history as if it is an essential part of human nature.
Gender equality is the equality of sexes on every aspect to the point that the gender differences should become totally immaterial in determining the laws and values. It implies that the concept of moms and dads, brothers and sisters, husbands and wives etc. should cease to have any meaning with time. Similarly, the distinction between homosexual and heterosexual relationship would also vanish. In the name of gender equality should we reach a point where the only distinction remaining would be the bodily organs? And it is for the advocates of gender equality to clarify the limits to which this should be allowed and pursued.
For those who have conviction in religion there is little scope to deny the role of gender in determining values, rights and responsibilities that are often diametrically at odds with the idea of gender equality. Male dominated Prophethood was one example, another one is: polygyny. It is clearly permitted in Islam and also found in the Biblical texts (Prophet Solomon and David). This phenomenon can also be seen in the animal kingdom, where the male species are the ones usually spreading their seeds. In contrast, women have not been given similar right to acquire multiple husbands (polyandry) and also human history shows polyandry to be of rare occurrences.
Final example of crucifixion is a reminder to those Christians that have taken up the fashionable trend of Islam-bashing using secular notions of gender equality and feminism. If you believe in gender equality can you explain why God almighty sacrificed his only begotten son in order to redeem the sins of mankind? Should He not have sacrificed a male and a female? More fundamentally, why God almighty did not even have a begotten daughter in the first place to sacrifice?
Yet, paradoxically, religious movements within the Abrahamic religions have sought to reinterpret religious texts in order to accommodate the idea of gender equality. In fact, they take so much pride in this activity that they call themselves a modernising ‘progressive’ force. But why should this be a one-way lane where religious values that are divine, reinterpreted to comply with man-made secular values? This means that the ‘progressive’ ‘religious’ movements are using secular values as the ultimate arbiter: clearly they are a fraudulent religious movement. Their activity is undermining the divine text from within that makes them more dangerous than the clearly visible belligerent apostates and infidels.
Christian and Jews have officially succumbed to the secular-feminist agenda of gender equality as they have started to allow female priests and Rabbis to conduct services and this is just the beginning. Note, it may well be argued their respective religious texts do allow for female, priests and Rabbis but the point is, the impetus for these changes has come from outside. The forces of secularism in the driving seat dictating compliance to gender equality.
In copycat style manner, following the footsteps of female priests and rabbis, Amina Abdul Wadud led a mix congregation of male and female Muslims in a Friday (Jumma) prayer for the first time in the 1500 years of Islamic history. Again the impetus for such acts emanates from the hostile secular environment. After the prayer, she are her clique stated that they were instilling gender equality and women’s rights. Ironically, Amina Abdul Wadud did that whilst wearing the Islamic headscarf (Hijab) which is considered by many to be at odds with gender equality and a symbol of the oppression of women!
Her claims of reinterpreting the text to establish ‘justice’ for women displays her arrogance. Let us put aside the ‘evil’ and impartial men. At the very beginnings of Islam there were the wives of the Prophet (SAW) with many other female personalities, followed by the successive generation of women scholars for centuries. Do we assume that they have all failed in their fundamental duty and hence overlooked their legitimate right to lead the Friday prayer of mix congregation? To the contrary segregation of prayers was established from the onset, as women were instructed to pray behind the men. If that is the case then how women can lead the men in prayer while the rest of the women are behind the men in the first place.
In any case, justice for Amina Abdul Wadud is not from within Islam but a reformed version that is in compliance to her preconceived secular values like gender equality; - the real arbiter. And not surprisingly she also favour homosexual marriages and detests the clear cut penal codes in the Quran. A clear act of apostasy!
Gender equality is only an example of the general drive by the moderate brigades to constantly prove the compatibility of Islam with secular values. If Islam is proven to be compatible to secular notions, what reasons remain than for adhering to Islam? Why not simply adopt the original yard stick of secularism instead of clinging on to the secular-compatible ‘Islam’. The exercise is very much an own goal scoring and completely folly. Given the choice between a genuine Rolls Royce and a close imitation it is well-known what most rational people would opt for.
The moderate brigade constantly shout about Women’s rights in Islam as a means to deflect criticisms emanating from the secular camp without once thinking about the credentials of those who are dispensing the criticisms. Do the critics have the right? To answer this question we need to examine their track record against what they preach. If they pass the test only then it makes sense to entertain their charges. Otherwise it is a pointless exercise to entertain the words of hypocrites.
As an example, the critics say polygyny as prescribed by Islam is wrong. Those who pose the questions do not officially practice polygyny but are virtually in a permanent state of polygamous relationships and even more given the level of infidelity, moral decay and a rejection of the traditional marriage that are often replaced with the so-called open relationships. In reality, the least monogamous societies are those who advocate and pretend to be one. Also, ironically, it is the Muslim societies driven by a strict moral code exhibits greater levels of successful monogamous relationship, despite being given the right to commit polygyny.
One cannot establish equality to any level without establishing genuine mutual respect from the heart. Waving the flag of women’s rights, wanting to be seen politically correct is simply pretentious. To illustrate the point, just ask the liberated women would they would feel safer in a lonely place with a group of devout Muslim men or a group of rowdy young men coming back from a party! If the men are drunk, they often lose their inhibitions and their inner traits surfaces. Their language and behaviour gets coloured by their sexual appetites. Iraq is another example, how many of the captured women were killed, raped and abused like it was done in Abu-Ghraib and other places by the flag bearers of women’s rights! In contrast, Jessica Lynch to the recent Italian journalists was released unharmed, treated well by their own words.
Finally, gender equality does not automatically result in tranquillity, harmony and a happier society. Self evident from the constant rise in divorce rates, single parents, drug dependencies, climbing suicide rates, sexual abuse etc. Relationship between the two sexes is not just a matter of treating them identically in every aspect. It must take everything into account and who better can answer that except the creator Himself. Alternatively we can choose to use our minds to determine the relationship. But that is simply guess work as nobody knows precisely what the rights and responsibilities should be, between the sexes so that a stable relationship is acquired with tranquillity.
Yamin Zakaria
London, UK
Copyright © 2005 by Yamin Zakaria.
|
_________________ Don't be a follower, but a prophet unto your own. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jumbalia

Joined: 04 Mar 2005 Posts: 87 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:01 pm Post subject: Equality |
|
|
This article illogically confuses "gender equality" with "gender sameness"
Genders are equal in rights.
Genders are not identical.
This is not a logical or moral problem.
My coworker can not do my job, and I can not do his. But we are paid the same and are equal inthe eyes of our boss.
For example, I am much stronger than my wife and I am more inclined to do certain jobs. I cut the grass, pick up the dog poop, scrape and paint the house and repaint it, help my friend move their heavy refrigerator etc. When we needed a 20 foot ditch dug in our backyard, I swung my shovel and pick-ax in the hot sun all afternoon. I wouldn't ask her to do this. My wife does our finances and laundry. (In case you wondering we both work and I bring in about 55% of the pay. And I do the dishes and pick up the house )
But we are equal. she has equal standing in our house. She IS half of our mutual home. We must both agree on big decisions.
Man and women are equal. They are not the same. This is how God made us.
Men and Women approach life from different angles. Men and women compliment each other. The sum of their parts is greater than the parts alone.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fern
Joined: 22 Jan 2005 Posts: 112
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When U had the time to prove yourself , U ran like a mouse . Now get over it dude . U lost .  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gupsfu

Joined: 06 Jul 2004 Posts: 7919
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now there is no doubt that this particular Muslim is indeed braindead. Why would anyone write such an article to promote his religion? May be Islam has already destroyed most of his brain cells, and that's why he's exposing all the Islamic degeneracies thinking people would embrace them. What a moron (even for a Muslim)! _________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrHappy

Joined: 16 Feb 2004 Posts: 1384 Location: R.I.P George Best
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is that fool Stammerin' Yammin still around ? _________________ If you see a sacred cow, kick it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yeezevee
Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 17109
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Yamin Zakaria London: Alternatively we can choose to use our minds to determine the relationship. But that is simply guess work as nobody knows precisely what the rights and responsibilities should be, between the sexes so that a stable relationship is acquired with tranquillity. |
everything is all right, but what are you talking Yamin, Why would you say "....simply guess work as nobody knows precisely what the rights and responsibilities should be".... I am under the impression that you know and this is already there in THAT BOOK and deeds of of Mr. PUBH.. follow the rules, rules are there, all the way how long the man should have the beard? and many times one should say talaq.. talaq to go and get an young wife..
yeezevee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darth
Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 2493
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Zakaria implies that gender inequality is reinforced by God from the fact that most religions out there have been started by men.
So if you ladies are hung up on gender equality you could
1)Claim to converse with Gibreel
2)Make commonplace poetry out of the very common incidents happening in your common lives. Make sure that every other line says God is merciful or compassionate or some such thing
3) If your life is too common you could of course instigate people to do a lot of wicked things and then claim that you have divine mandate.
4) Claim a night flight to alpha century (the seven heavens have already been done)
5)Make all kinds of rules and regulations at your pleasure. (Husbands that do not do laundry and dishes will get hellfire) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Orenda
Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ali's writing about smart people having stupid beliefs, coupled with Yamin's ramblings about Amina Wadud has reminded me of a conversation I recently had with a friend of mine. I respect him very much in many ways and he is, altogether, intelligent and fair, ( a so-called "progressive Muslim") but when asked why women in Islam aren't allowed to lead the prayer, instead of telling me how I was wrong and they could, as I expected him to say, he gave the stupidest answer - "What if the woman is leading the prayer and suddenly the (menstral) blood will come? Muslims cannot pray when they are bleeding so this would make it impossible for a woman to lead the prayer."
Later on he conceded that it was just a stupid excuse and he personally didn't find anything wrong with women leading prayers. Then he began to tell me about an older woman whom he saw leading prayer back in Pakistan. I guess she was allowed because she had reached menopause? He constantly wants me to distinguish between Islam as it is known, and his own Islam. I feel like Ali Sina when I am always arguing with him that "Why call it Islam when it is not? " "What are you trying to hold onto when you reject 80% of it already?" I show him verses of Qur'an and he won't defend the teachings but instead he tells me not to read it alone because it will make me a shaytan if I read the Quran alone without a teacher. I said, yeah this is proof that Quran has a negative effect, and he told me that only certain people with higher knowledge can understand it.
Then what is the point ? If only wise people can understand it , then it means it is dangerous to average people and useless to wise people who don't need it because rely on their wisdom to translate dangerous words into benign ones!
Anyways, 1 stupid belief down....a few more to go. He will become confident in his inner kufr one day  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Susan
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 1534
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| instead of telling me how I was wrong and they could, as I expected him to say, he gave the stupidest answer - "What if the woman is leading the prayer and suddenly the (menstral) blood will come? Muslims cannot pray when they are bleeding so this would make it impossible for a woman to lead the prayer." |
I must admit that once, when I was visiting some Muslim relatives, I ran my hands all over their kkkoran, while I was having my period, knowing full well that it was "haram" to do so. (A giant copy was proudly displayed on one of their tables.)
Ohh, I'm b-a-d!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
R_Nelson

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 582 Location: West of the North Pole
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Susan wrote: |
Ohh, I'm b-a-d!  |
When you're good, you're very good, but when you're b-a-d, you're better.  _________________ "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
There is no god "Allah", and Mohammed was insane.
There is no god "Allah", and Mohammed was insane.
There is no god "Allah", and Mohammed was insane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hector

Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 7144 Location: Astroistan
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2005 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yamin Zakaria's view on inequality of the sexes is the typical Muslim view, including Muslim women, even those who are educated.
Therefore, I am going to be controversial and say that educated Muslim women must share the blame. I don't expect uneducated downtrodden Muslimahs to be in the position to change the misogynism in Islam. But educated Muslimahs should know better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darth
Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 2493
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2005 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hector wrote: |
Yamin Zakaria's view on inequality of the sexes is the typical Muslim view, including Muslim women, even those who are educated.
Therefore, I am going to be controversial and say that educated Muslim women must share the blame. I don't expect uneducated downtrodden Muslimahs to be in the position to change the misogynism in Islam. But educated Muslimahs should know better. |
I agree. Take a look at the comments on bbc on a woman leading a prayer service - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/4369681.stm. There is a lot of opposition from muslim women too. Looks like they are okay with being treated like second class citizens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blue

Joined: 21 Jan 2005 Posts: 482 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2005 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Susan wrote: |
I must admit that once, when I was visiting some Muslim relatives, I ran my hands all over their kkkoran, while I was having my period, knowing full well that it was "haram" to do so. (A giant copy was proudly displayed on one of their tables.)
|
Love it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
duckie
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Posts: 76 Location: U.S.
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2005 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with Mr. Sina. The hypocrite "moderates" are worse than the Zakarias of the world. At least he knows it for what it is.
I was a moderate married to a moderate and dutifully turned a blind eye to the real Islam. Over the years, it became impossible. Women I knew were coerced into having babies even when it wasn't safe. Wives were at the mercy of their husbands because they had no means of support and were saddled by lots of kids. To keep them in line, they'd threaten to leave them destitute.
I found out there was polygyny here, which surprised me since it is illegal. One wife was convinced by her hubby to only have a "religious" ceremony, so when he left her she had no legal grounds as his wife. Another wife was blamed when a Muslim man made a pass at her and staulked her.
I was told by the moderates that women are "protected" in Islam. Personally, I think of divorce as a protection against ill-treatment, not a reason to take away women's rights. Muslims think divorce is a bad thing because it gives a woman options to get away from a bad husband. Bad husband: good. Divorce: bad.
My Muslim women friends were in shock when I filed for divorce, thinking that this was the worse thing that could happen to me. Muslim wives are conditioned into believing that they are nothing without their husbands. No, staying with a Muslim husband who could care less about his wife and children would have been much worse.
One of the things my ex asked me was "why can't you be a good Muslim wife?" I asked him, "What's a good Muslim wife?" He gave me look like he didn't appreciate my sarcasm, but he elaborated, "someone who never argues with her husband, does what she is told and respects him as the head of the household." This, coming from a "moderate" who was always telling non-Muslims how liberated his ideas were. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ali Sina
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 4607
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2005 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| One of the things my ex asked me was "why can't you be a good Muslim wife?" I asked him, "What's a good Muslim wife?" He gave me look like he didn't appreciate my sarcasm, but he elaborated, "someone who never argues with her husband, does what she is told and respects him as the head of the household." This, coming from a "moderate" who was always telling non-Muslims how liberated his ideas were. |
That is the definition of a good dog. _________________ Don't be a follower, but a prophet unto your own. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|