|
Attention: Year 2009 is here
Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 4:35 am Post subject: Let Heraclius Judges who was Muhammad |
|
|
OK let Heraclius judges it :
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/001.sbt.html
Volume 1, Book 1, Number 6:
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas:
Abu Sufyan bin Harb informed me that Heraclius had sent a messenger to him while he had been accompanying a caravan from Quraish. They were merchants doing business in Sham (Syria, Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan), at the time when Allah's Apostle had truce with Abu Sufyan and Quraish infidels. So Abu Sufyan and his companions went to Heraclius at Ilya (Jerusalem). Heraclius called them in the court and he had all the senior Roman dignitaries around him. He called for his translator who, translating Heraclius's question said to them, "Who amongst you is closely related to that man who claims to be a Prophet?" Abu Sufyan replied, "I am the nearest relative to him (amongst the group)."
Heraclius said, "Bring him (Abu Sufyan) close to me and make his companions stand behind him." Abu Sufyan added, Heraclius told his translator to tell my companions that he wanted to put some questions to me regarding that man (The Prophet) and that if I told a lie they (my companions) should contradict me." Abu Sufyan added, "By Allah! Had I not been afraid of my companions labeling me a liar, I would not have spoken the truth about the Prophet. The first question he asked me about him was:
'What is his family status amongst you?'
I replied, 'He belongs to a good (noble) family amongst us.'
Heraclius further asked, 'Has anybody amongst you ever claimed the same (i.e. to be a Prophet) before him?'
I replied, 'No.'
He said, 'Was anybody amongst his ancestors a king?'
I replied, 'No.'
Heraclius asked, 'Do the nobles or the poor follow him?'
I replied, 'It is the poor who follow him.'
He said, 'Are his followers increasing decreasing (day by day)?'
I replied, 'They are increasing.'
He then asked, 'Does anybody amongst those who embrace his religion become displeased and renounce the religion afterwards?'
I replied, 'No.'
Heraclius said, 'Have you ever accused him of telling lies before his claim (to be a Prophet)?'
I replied, 'No. '
Heraclius said, 'Does he break his promises?'
I replied, 'No. We are at truce with him but we do not know what he will do in it.' I could not find opportunity to say anything against him except that.
Heraclius asked, 'Have you ever had a war with him?'
I replied, 'Yes.'
Then he said, 'What was the outcome of the battles?'
I replied, 'Sometimes he was victorious and sometimes we.'
Heraclius said, 'What does he order you to do?'
I said, 'He tells us to worship Allah and Allah alone and not to worship anything along with Him, and to renounce all that our ancestors had said. He orders us to pray, to speak the truth, to be chaste and to keep good relations with our Kith and kin.'
Heraclius asked the translator to convey to me the following, I asked you about his family and your reply was that he belonged to a very noble family. In fact all the Apostles come from noble families amongst their respective peoples. I questioned you whether anybody else amongst you claimed such a thing, your reply was in the negative. If the answer had been in the affirmative, I would have thought that this man was following the previous man's statement. Then I asked you whether anyone of his ancestors was a king. Your reply was in the negative, and if it had been in the affirmative, I would have thought that this man wanted to take back his ancestral kingdom.
I further asked whether he was ever accused of telling lies before he said what he said, and your reply was in the negative. So I wondered how a person who does not tell a lie about others could ever tell a lie about Allah. I, then asked you whether the rich people followed him or the poor. You replied that it was the poor who followed him. And in fact all the Apostle have been followed by this very class of people. Then I asked you whether his followers were increasing or decreasing. You replied that they were increasing, and in fact this is the way of true faith, till it is complete in all respects. I further asked you whether there was anybody, who, after embracing his religion, became displeased and discarded his religion. Your reply was in the negative, and in fact this is (the sign of) true faith, when its delight enters the hearts and mixes with them completely. I asked you whether he had ever betrayed. You replied in the negative and likewise the Apostles never betray. Then I asked you what he ordered you to do. You replied that he ordered you to worship Allah and Allah alone and not to worship any thing along with Him and forbade you to worship idols and ordered you to pray, to speak the truth and to be chaste. If what you have said is true, he will very soon occupy this place underneath my feet and I knew it (from the scriptures) that he was going to appear but I did not know that he would be from you, and if I could reach him definitely, I would go immediately to meet him and if I were with him, I would certainly wash his feet.' Heraclius then asked for the letter addressed by Allah's Apostle
which was delivered by Dihya to the Governor of Busra, who forwarded it to Heraclius to read. The contents of the letter were as follows: "In the name of Allah the Beneficent, the Merciful (This letter is) from Muhammad the slave of Allah and His Apostle to Heraclius the ruler of Byzantine. Peace be upon him, who follows the right path. Furthermore I invite you to Islam, and if you become a Muslim you will be safe, and Allah will double your reward, and if you reject this invitation of Islam you will be committing a sin by misguiding your Arisiyin (peasants). (And I recite to you Allah's Statement:)
'O people of the scripture! Come to a word common to you and us that we worship none but Allah and that we associate nothing in worship with Him, and that none of us shall take others as Lords beside Allah. Then, if they turn away, say: Bear witness that we are Muslims (those who have surrendered to Allah).' (3 4).
Abu Sufyan then added, "When Heraclius had finished his speech and had read the letter, there was a great hue and cry in the Royal Court. So we were turned out of the court. I told my companions that the question of Ibn-Abi-Kabsha) (the Prophet Muhammad) has become so prominent that even the King of Bani Al-Asfar (Byzantine) is afraid of him. Then I started to become sure that he (the Prophet) would be the conqueror in the near future till I embraced Islam (i.e. Allah guided me to it)."
The sub narrator adds, "Ibn An-Natur was the Governor of llya' (Jerusalem) and Heraclius was the head of the Christians of Sham. Ibn An-Natur narrates that once while Heraclius was visiting ilya' (Jerusalem), he got up in the morning with a sad mood. Some of his priests asked him why he was in that mood? Heraclius was a foreteller and an astrologer. He replied, 'At night when I looked at the stars, I saw that the leader of those who practice circumcision had appeared (become the conqueror). Who are they who practice circumcision?' The people replied, 'Except the Jews nobody practices circumcision, so you should not be afraid of them (Jews).
'Just Issue orders to kill every Jew present in the country.'
While they were discussing it, a messenger sent by the king of Ghassan to convey the news of Allah's Apostle to Heraclius was brought in. Having heard the news, he (Heraclius) ordered the people to go and see whether the messenger of Ghassan was circumcised. The people, after seeing him, told Heraclius that he was circumcised. Heraclius then asked him about the Arabs. The messenger replied, 'Arabs also practice circumcision.'
(After hearing that) Heraclius remarked that sovereignty of the 'Arabs had appeared. Heraclius then wrote a letter to his friend in Rome who was as good as Heraclius in knowledge. Heraclius then left for Homs. (a town in Syrian and stayed there till he received the reply of his letter from his friend who agreed with him in his opinion about the emergence of the Prophet and the fact that he was a Prophet. On that Heraclius invited all the heads of the Byzantines to assemble in his palace at Homs. When they assembled, he ordered that all the doors of his palace be closed. Then he came out and said, 'O Byzantines! If success is your desire and if you seek right guidance and want your empire to remain then give a pledge of allegiance to this Prophet (i.e. embrace Islam).'
(On hearing the views of Heraclius) the people ran towards the gates of the palace like onagers but found the doors closed. Heraclius realized their hatred towards Islam and when he lost the hope of their embracing Islam, he ordered that they should be brought back in audience.
(When they returned) he said, 'What already said was just to test the strength of your conviction and I have seen it.' The people prostrated before him and became pleased with him, and this was the end of Heraclius's story (in connection with his faith).
conclusion :
1. I asked you about his family and your reply was that he belonged to a very noble family. In fact all the Apostles come from noble families amongst their respective peoples.
2. I questioned you whether anybody else amongst you claimed such a thing, your reply was in the negative. If the answer had been in the affirmative, I would have thought that this man was following the previous man's statement.
3. Then I asked you whether anyone of his ancestors was a king. Your reply was in the negative, and if it had been in the affirmative, I would have thought that this man wanted to take back his ancestral kingdom.
4. I further asked whether he was ever accused of telling lies before he said what he said, and your reply was in the negative. So I wondered how a person who does not tell a lie about others could ever tell a lie about Allah.
5. I, then asked you whether the rich people followed him or the poor. You replied that it was the poor who followed him. And in fact all the Apostle have been followed by this very class of people.
6. Then I asked you whether his followers were increasing or decreasing. You replied that they were increasing, and in fact this is the way of true faith, till it is complete in all respects.
7. I further asked you whether there was anybody, who, after embracing his religion, became displeased and discarded his religion. Your reply was in the negative, and in fact this is (the sign of) true faith, when its delight enters the hearts and mixes with them completely.
8. I asked you whether he had ever betrayed. You replied in the negative and likewise the Apostles never betray.
9. Then I asked you what he ordered you to do. You replied that he ordered you to worship Allah and Allah alone and not to worship any thing along with Him and forbade you to worship idols and ordered you to pray, to speak the truth and to be chaste. If what you have said is true, he will very soon occupy this place underneath my feet and I knew it (from the scriptures) that he was going to appear but I did not know that he would be from you, and if I could reach him definitely, I would go immediately to meet him and if I were with him, I would certainly wash his feet.' _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Majdi
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 1287
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I aint reading all that.
Make it short.
Plus why is a hadith authentic when its in the advantage of Mohammed and its corrupted when its against him ?
I will tell you why... Hypocritie. _________________ Majdi : I shall return with this shield or upon it . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Basileos

Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 4873 Location: Snowy forests of the North
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's a Muslim fairy tale.
The Byzantine government was highly beaurocratic and Emperor did not even hear letters from minor leaders. He had others, much more important buisnesses. Officials of the foreign afairs beauros were responsible for contact with tribal chiefs like Muhammas. _________________ Those who make you believe absurdities will also make you commit monstrosities. -Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
plata moya

Joined: 24 May 2005 Posts: 2741 Location: Muhammad stoned a she monkey for adultery.
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
9. Then I asked you what he ordered you to do. You replied that he ordered you to worship Allah and Allah alone and not to worship any thing along with Him and forbade you to worship idols and ordered you to pray, to speak the truth and to be chaste. If what you have said is true, he will very soon occupy this place underneath my feet and I knew it (from the scriptures) that he was going to appear but I did not know that he would be from you, and if I could reach him definitely, I would go immediately to meet him and if I were with him, I would certainly wash his feet.' Keep the jokes coming they crack me up.
_________________ And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? ... Now kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man, keep alive for yourselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
HA HA HA
TRUTH HURTS ...!! HUH ?  _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Real Old Dutch
Joined: 11 Jul 2005 Posts: 1290 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Majdi wrote: |
I aint reading all that.
Make it short.
Plus why is a hadith authentic when its in the advantage of Mohammed and its corrupted when its against him ?
I will tell you why... Hypocritie. |
That's a great observation, Majdi... Those stupid Muslims are forever crying about stacks of hadiths being corrupted, while they continiously come up with so called authentic ones, nobody feels like reading...
I have not read one word of what this Muslim-idiot pasted here...
I only read the reactions... Great show!...
DEATH TO ISLAM!... _________________ ISLAM... is the most primitive- and backward- religion in the world... with a Quran (Koran), written by tent-nomads, still stupid today... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Basileos

Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 4873 Location: Snowy forests of the North
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Feodor Fathon wrote: |
HA HA HA
TRUTH HURTS ...!! HUH ?  |
Have you read what I wrote?
This hadith story is unhistorical fairy tale. _________________ Those who make you believe absurdities will also make you commit monstrosities. -Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Basileos wrote: |
That's a Muslim fairy tale.
The Byzantine government was highly beaurocratic and Emperor did not even hear letters from minor leaders. He had others, much more important buisnesses. Officials of the foreign afairs beauros were responsible for contact with tribal chiefs like Muhammas. |
read once more !!
Heraclius didnt met Muhammad but Abu Sufyan the enemy of Muhammad.
Heraclius was in Jazeera of Arabia for expansion in land of emperium of persia _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sahara
Joined: 24 Dec 2005 Posts: 12461 Location: Banned
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
So does Abu Sufyan fall into the category of people who could actually meet with Heraclius?
| Quote: |
| The Byzantine government was highly beaurocratic and Emperor did not even hear letters from minor leaders. He had others, much more important buisnesses. Officials of the foreign afairs beauros were responsible for contact with tribal chiefs like Muhammas. |
See that part in bold, is what Basileos was trying to make you see, if you noticed it then you must think that Abu Sufyan was a really important person, which he was not. He was a minor leader of a dusty desert people. Hardly worth the time and effort of conversation on the part of an Emperor, unless he was looking for a date!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sahara wrote: |
So does Abu Sufyan fall into the category of people who could actually meet with Heraclius?
| Quote: |
| The Byzantine government was highly beaurocratic and Emperor did not even hear letters from minor leaders. He had others, much more important buisnesses. Officials of the foreign afairs beauros were responsible for contact with tribal chiefs like Muhammas. |
See that part in bold, is what Basileos was trying to make you see, if you noticed it then you must think that Abu Sufyan was a really important person, which he was not. He was a minor leader of a dusty desert people. Hardly worth the time and effort of conversation on the part of an Emperor, unless he was looking for a date!  |
dude ... !!
Arabians were importhant for Byzantium for enlargement its emperium and attacking persia
the most importhant policy of byzantium was gloriness in Arabia..of course arabians were importhant for them _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Basileos

Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 4873 Location: Snowy forests of the North
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Feodor Fathon wrote: |
| sahara wrote: |
So does Abu Sufyan fall into the category of people who could actually meet with Heraclius?
| Quote: |
| The Byzantine government was highly beaurocratic and Emperor did not even hear letters from minor leaders. He had others, much more important buisnesses. Officials of the foreign afairs beauros were responsible for contact with tribal chiefs like Muhammas. |
See that part in bold, is what Basileos was trying to make you see, if you noticed it then you must think that Abu Sufyan was a really important person, which he was not. He was a minor leader of a dusty desert people. Hardly worth the time and effort of conversation on the part of an Emperor, unless he was looking for a date!  |
dude ... !!
Arabians were importhant for Byzantium for enlargement its emperium and attacking persia
the most importhant policy of byzantium was gloriness in Arabia..of course arabians were importhant for them |
Dude, in Byzantium even the highest officials and greatests magnates barely could see the Emperor. Could it be possible that a tent-dwelling nomad was permitted to talk with the heir of Ceasar and Constantine?
Arabia was a buffer zone between Byzantium and Persia. Both empires maintained a network of client states to secure their own borders. During the wars, Byzantium and Persia were trying to gain military support from these client states and tribes. But a personal talk between Emperor and an envoy of a tribe was totally unimaginable. _________________ Those who make you believe absurdities will also make you commit monstrosities. -Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chingachgook

Joined: 16 Feb 2004 Posts: 3101 Location: Land of Twilight Zone
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sahara wrote: |
So does Abu Sufyan fall into the category of people who could actually meet with Heraclius?
| Quote: |
| The Byzantine government was highly beaurocratic and Emperor did not even hear letters from minor leaders. He had others, much more important buisnesses. Officials of the foreign afairs beauros were responsible for contact with tribal chiefs like Muhammas. |
See that part in bold, is what Basileos was trying to make you see, if you noticed it then you must think that Abu Sufyan was a really important person, which he was not. He was a minor leader of a dusty desert people. Hardly worth the time and effort of conversation on the part of an Emperor, unless he was looking for a date!  |
Probably still panting from chasing desert lizards for dinner!
Heraclius could have said with a roar, "Summon the Profit before me! "
I am sure Emperors were knowledgeable people so I doubt Heraclius would dwell on questions which the very ordinary man-in-the-desert could easily fulfill, not being descendants of kings, not lying, preaching.....
If such a man were to be interviewed by Big Chief Chingachgook, the very first question I would ask would be: " What sign does he show to prove he was a Prophet? "
Basil is right, this is a fairy-tale, just like the fable of the woman who use to throw rubbish at the Profit while on his way to and from solats .... this woman seems to be always on the look-out for the Profit. I guess he was murdered by her husband for forgeting to cook, having to be watching for the Profit ....  _________________ When Muslims DON'T follow Islam they are holy. When Christians DON'T follow Christ's they are not holy (chingachgook)
</islam>  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hector

Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 7144 Location: Astroistan
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The dates may be slightly problematic. Muhammad allegedly sent the letter to Heraclius in 6AH or 628AD. Problem is... although the Byzantines recaptured Jerusalem from the Persians in 628AD, Heraclius only visited Jerusalem in the spring of 630AD. _________________ What sort of man would f*ck a sweet little prepubescent nine-year-old child who liked playing with dolls and swings? Mo the demon Pedophile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hector wrote: |
| The dates may be slightly problematic. Muhammad allegedly sent the letter to Heraclius in 6AH or 628AD. Problem is... although the Byzantines recaptured Jerusalem from the Persians in 628AD, Heraclius only visited Jerusalem in the spring of 630AD. |
correct !!!! ...READ once more the hadith ....
Heraclius then asked for the letter addressed by Allah's Apostle
which was delivered by Dihya to the Governor of Busra, who forwarded it to Heraclius to read. The contents of the letter were as follows: "In the name of Allah the Beneficent, the Merciful (This letter is) from Muhammad the slave of Allah and His Apostle to Heraclius the ruler of Byzantine. Peace be upon him, who follows the right path. Furthermore I invite you to Islam, and if you become a Muslim you will be safe, and Allah will double your reward, and if you reject this invitation of Islam you will be committing a sin by misguiding your Arisiyin (peasants). (And I recite to you Allah's Statement:)
'O people of the scripture! Come to a word common to you and us that we worship none but Allah and that we associate nothing in worship with Him, and that none of us shall take others as Lords beside Allah. Then, if they turn away, say: Bear witness that we are Muslims (those who have surrendered to Allah).' (34).
Abu Sufyan then added, "When Heraclius had finished his speech and had read the letter, there was a great hue and cry in the Royal Court. So we were turned out of the court. I told my companions that the question of Ibn-Abi-Kabsha) (the Prophet Muhammad) has become so prominent that even the King of Bani Al-Asfar (Byzantine) is afraid of him. Then I started to become sure that he (the Prophet) would be the conqueror in the near future till I embraced Islam (i.e. Allah guided me to it)." _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hector

Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 7144 Location: Astroistan
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Feodor,
Unfortunately, the problem still exists because the hadith says that Abu Sufyan met Heraclius in Ilya (i.e. Jerusalem). It is well known that Heraclius only visited Jerusalem in the spring of 630AD while the letter was supposedly sent in 628AD.
I know things moved more slowly in those days but after 2 years I doubt the Emperor would have been the slightest bit interested. I also know Muslim sources claim Heraclius was in Jerusalem in 628AD but that is contrary to established historical evidence. _________________ What sort of man would f*ck a sweet little prepubescent nine-year-old child who liked playing with dolls and swings? Mo the demon Pedophile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|