返回总目录
The Satanic Verses and the Miracle of the Qur'an
The Satanic Verses and their implications for the Miracle of the Qur'an
For the historical background on the satanic verses, please read
the article by Ernest Hahn.
Here I only want to reflect on the implications of this event on
the claimed miracle of eloquence which propsed as proof for the
divine authorship of the Qur'an.
Muslim authorities admit that Muhammad was at one time inspired
by Satan to put some verses into the Qur'an. Some time later,
upon receiving further revelation from Jibril, that those
verses were not from God, but interjected by Satan, they were
removed again. The Qur'an reports about it in Surah 22:52
Never sent We a messenger or a prophet before thee
but when He recited (the message) Satan proposed
(opposition) in respect of that which he recited thereof.
But Allah abolisheth that which Satan proposeth.
Then Allah establisheth His revelations. Allah is Knower, Wise;
This means Satan was able to interfere with Muhammad's
revelation and create some verses in praise of the idols
al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat, [see Sura 53:19-20], calling them
"al-Gharaniq al-ula", "the high birds". He later annulled this
(see Asbab al-Nuzul by al-Wahidi; chapter on why Sura
al-Hajj was revealed).
It seems that Satan was able to inspire some verses and nobody
realized it until Allah pointed it out by giving further
revelation. This means in particular: there was no "inferior
language" in those verses which came from Satan in comparison
to those which came (supposedly) from Allah because Muhammad
didn't realize it at the time.
The Qur'an states:
"And if you all are in doubt about what I have revealed
to My servant, bring a single sura like it, and call
your witnesses besides Allah if you are truthful." (2:23)
and specifically includes the jinn in the challenge:
"Say: If all mankind and the jinn would come together
to produce the like of this Qur'an, they could not
produce its like even though they exerted all and their
strength in aiding one another." (17:88)
According to the Qur'an, Satan is one of the jinn. We have
learned that he gave revelation which Muhammad recited as
being divine Qur'an. This revelation was sufficiently "like
it" because Muhammad himself was not able to recognize that
those verses were from Satan instead of from God. He was
not able to distinguish those verses from the rest of the
Qur'an based on their language. Instead, he needed another
revelation from God to be informed about the falsehood of
the former.
This incident has several implications. The challenge of the
Qur'an to "bring a surah like it" was actually met by those
satanic verses in Muhammad's own time, which in turn leads
to the conclusion that the rest of the Qur'an is not from
God either.
Some might want to respond with the argument that these
satanic verses are "not long enough" to be counted as a whole
sura as the Qur'an demands. This is a rather weak argument
based on quantity instead of quality since such a response
already acknowledges that the verses meet the criterion to
be "like the Qur'an". If the Qur'an had contained a sura
as short as these verses, you would not have rejected to
believe it based on brevity. How do you know what is the
minimum length for a possible sura?
For those who do not want to accept that these verses meet
the challenge in a qualitative way, and who claim that they
know with their "feeling for good Arabic", that these are
inferior to the Qur'an, we respond that they apparently
claim to know Arabic better, and that they have a better
grasp on how to evaluate a sura than even Muhammad himself,
who could not distinguish the fake from the real on the
basis of language features.
In the very least, this incident shows that Muhammad himself
did not have any objective criteria on which to base an
acceptance or rejection of a text that would take up the
challenge in the Qur'an.
Where then do you get your "feeling" from or from what source
will you derive your "criteria" on the basis of which you
can decide whether a certain Arabic text meets the Qur'anic
challenge, or not? Particularly, on what basis can you reject
these suras as not
meeting the challenge?
Further discussion of the miraculous eloquence of the Qur'an
Answering Islam Home Page