This debate is a fast-paced, high-spirited discussion on the evidence for Muhammad as a true prophet of God. The conversation rejects political correctness shooting straight at the heart of the issues surrounding Muhammad's life and character. David Wood presents a formidable case against Muhammad through a look at three areas: 1) Why Christians do not believe Muhammad was a prophet, 2) Scientific inaccuracies in the Qur'an and the failure of the challenge from literary excellence, and 3) The reliability of the prophet Muhammad. Ali Ataie offers a whirlwind of rebuttals including that the Christian apologetic approach is merely a surface level "smokescreen" ignoring hundreds of years of Muslim scholarship, and using materials that are not respected by a majority of Muslim scholars.
At the beginning, when Wood says, "I do want to warn everyone here that this is not going to be pretty," he rightly foreshadows the enjoyable jousting between two well-versed scholars. When the dust has settled, however, Ataie has presented more material about Jesus than he has offered in defense of Muhammad. Wood's original arguments bear the brunt of a carefully prepared assault, yet the arguments emerge unscathed.