There is no need for us to write yet another lenghty rebuttal. We simply
quote the following section from Lee Strobel, taken from his interview with
leading NT archaeologist John McRay:
The birth narratives of Jesus claim that Mary and Joseph were required by
a census to return to Joseph's hometown of Bethlehem. "Let me be blunt: this
seems absurd on the face of it," I said. "How could the government possibly
force all its citizens to return to their birthplace? Is there any archaeological
evidence whatsoever that this kind of census ever took place?"
McRay calmly pulled out a copy of his book. "Actually, the discovery
of ancient census forms has shed quite a bit of light on this practice," he
said as he leafed through the pages. Finding the reference he was searching
for, he quoted from an official governmental order dated A.D. 104.
Gauis Vibius Maximus, Prefect of Egypt [says]: Seeing that the time has come
for the house to house census, it is necessary to compel all those who for
any cause whatsoever are residing out of their provinces to return to
their own homes, that they may both carry out the regular order of
the census and may also attend diligently to the cultivation of their allotments.
"As you can see," he said as he closed the book, "that practice is confirmed
by this document, even though this particular manner of counting people
might seem odd to you. And another papyrus, this one from A.D. 48, indicates
that the entire family was involved in the census."
This, however, did not entirely dispose of this issue. Luke said the census
that brought Joseph and Mary to Bethlehem was conducted when Quirinius was
governing Syria and during the reign of Herod the Great.
"That poses a significant problem," I pointed out, "because Herod died in
4 B.C., and Quirinius didn't begin ruling Syria until A.D. 6, conducting the
census soon after that. There's a big gap there; how can you deal with such
a major discrepancy in the dates?"
McRay knew I was raising an issue that archaeologists have wrestled with
for years. He responded by saying, "An eminent archaeologist named Jerry
Vardaman has done a great deal of work in this regard. He has found a coin
with the name of Quirinius on it in very small writing, or what we call
'micrographic' letters. This places him as proconsul of Syria and Cilicia
from 11 B.C. until after the death of Herod."
I was confused. "What does this mean?" I asked.
"It means that there were apparently two Quiriniuses,"he replied. "It's not
uncommon to have lots of people with the same Roman names, so there's no
reason to doubt that there were two people by the name of Quirinius. The
census would have taken place under the reign of the earlier Quirinius.
Given the cycle of a census every fourteen years, that would work out
quite well." (Strobel, The Case for Christ - A Journalist's Personal
Investigation of the Evidence for Jesus [Zondervan Publishing House,
Grand Rapids, MI, 1998; ISBN: 0-310-20930-7], pp. 101-102)