返回总目录
Lesson III
Part A | Part B
| Part C | Part D
LESSON III
CHRIST GLORIFIED IN DIFFERENT PATTERNS
Part A
As we have seen in previous lessons, the most common way for the church
to express its faith in western societies has been through the institutional pattern.
Consequently, this is the only pattern with which many Christians are familiar. But this
form can be easily eliminated by a repressive government and it is difficult to maintain
in other hostile environments. Let us consider some of the options that might be open to
you, if you and your fellow believers were living under the rule of those who were trying
to repress Christianity.
- You might submit to the oppression, allow your church to cease to exist and your faith
to die. Of course, no real Christian would plan to follow this option. But many have
followed it by default, when the crisis came and they were unprepared. If we do not think
through our position in Christ, and determine His leading in advance, we could end up in
this category, in spite of good intentions.
- You and your church may decide to continue to operate as close to the old patterns as
the authorities will permit, submitting to all of their demands. We call this a
"Co-existing Church." We discussed in the last lesson the pattern of gradually
tightening restrictions which are often used by repressive authorities. Yet a weak, feeble
church is often allowed to exist. In the Soviet Union, the Orthodox church leader was
selected by the Communist government, and he was not even a professing Christian before
his appointment! Yet the church accepted his appointment! In China, one Catholic church
and one Protestant church are allowed to remain open even throughout the Cultural
Revolution, but very few Chinese dared to attend. North Vietnam provides another good
example of a church that attempted to exist within the old patterns under a repressive
government. The Evangelical church of Hanoi still stands, but it has no outreach. On the
inside walls of the buildings are pictures of Ho Chi Minh. On the outside there is
government propaganda. Attendance is small and consists primarily of old people. No young
people are allowed to be trained for future ministry, as the government believes that the
"need" for religion will die out with the older generation. The pastor claims
that there are evangelistic meetings and baptisms, but no outsider has ever observed them.
The Communists have used this one church for the past five decades to "prove"
they permit religious freedom.
- Another pattern that you might consider, which Christians in some hostile environments
have used, is that of the "Protest Church." This type of church attempts to
openly resist the authorities. If the government orders that all meetings must secure
prior permission, the Christians defy the order and hold "illegal" meetings. If
the government seizes their building, they hold outdoor meetings. Many of the martyrs of
the church in the 20th Century have come from this group. They have determined to resist
the government and are willing to pay the price. We can be justly proud of Christians who
have the courage to stand against such adversity. However, the "protest" pattern
needs special conditions, such as the following:
a. If the governmental restrictions against Christianity are arbitrary
and not essential to the long-range aims of the government, these protests may result in
their being changed. But as we have noted earlier, in a Communist state, this is not the
case. Resistance may delay the government, but Communism cannot tolerate Christianity in
the long run (e.g., Ethiopia).
b. If a large percentage of the people are Christians, and protest
becomes popular, the government may be forced to make some concessions (e.g., Poland).
c. If Christianity has existed in the country for many generations and
is broadly understood, so that untrained laymen can be found to replace leaders removed by
the government, the protests may continue for an extended period. (e.g., U.S.S.R.)
If you and your Christians friends should realize that continued
expression of your faith in traditional patterns is impossible, you may choose to go
"underground." By this, we mean that to continue to function as a biblical
church, as explained in Lesson I, you cannot do it openly. Is the "underground"
approach cowardly? Should Christians be willing "to take a stand" and be ready
to face the persecution that will follow? Perhaps. But it may be that the Holy Spirit will
lead different individuals to follow different patterns, even in the same country. We will
consider some scripture in Part B, and to try to establish some biblical principles.
Suggested Discussion Questions:
1. Why do you think most Christians prefer to work with the co-existing
church?
2. What are some disadvantages of the underground church?
* * * * *
Back to the top
Part B
In Luke 9, the disciples complained to the Lord Jesus that some other
men who were not of their group were ministering in Jesus name. The disciples had
forbidden them to continue, but Jesus said, "Do not stop them...for whoever is not
against you is for you." (Lk. 9:50). Peter found this a very hard lesson to learn.
The Lord had to deal with him very specifically through a vision and a dramatic experience
before he could say, "I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism,
but accepts men from every nation who fear Him and do what is right." (Acts 10:9-48).
The Apostle Paul enlarged on this idea in Romans 14. He summarized his teaching when he
said, "Who are you to judge someone elses servant?" (Rom. 14:4). "You
then, why do you judge your brother? ... for we will all stand before Gods judgment
seat." (Rom. 14:10). He even approved of the preaching of some who had a wrong
motive, but were still preaching the Gospel! (Phil. 1:12-18). Scriptures clearly teach
that divisions in the body should not come about due to different leaders, although they
may lead in different ways (I Cor. 1:11-17). We should be very careful about rejecting
someone simply because they do not serve the Lord in the same way we do. If we quietly go
about the work the Lord has given us, we need not be overly concerned about how others
feel led to serve Him.
Now let us consider various ways people in the Bible reacted to
oppressive authorities:
1. Samuel. When the Lord had told him to anoint the future king,
Samuel was afraid. So the Lord showed him how to cover what he was doing without telling a
lie! (I Sam. 16:1-5).
2. Elijah. On one occasion, he boldly defied the king (I Kings
17:1). On another he was led of the Lord to run and hide. (I Kings 17:3).
3. Esther. In this beautiful Old Testament account Esther became
the queen, and did not even reveal to her husband, the King, that she was Jewish. But at
the proper time she rendered very important service to her people, even risking her life.
4. Daniel. In book of Daniel, he and his three friends boldly
faced death in defying the king, but God protected them. (Daniel 3 & 6).
5. Jesus. In John's Gospel account, Jesus avoided the Jewish
rulers, and even hid Himself one occasion. (Jn. 11:54; 8:59).
6. Peter and John. The authorities ordered them not to
preach, but they refused to obey. (Acts 4:18-20).
7. Paul. He was especially flexible in the face of opposition.
Sometimes he fled (Acts 9:23-31), sometimes he went to prison (Acts 14:19-20), sometimes
he called upon God for miracles (Acts 13:10-11). But in all cases he allowed the Holy
Spirit to show him what to do. He was guided by this principle, "I have become all
things to all men, so that by all possible means I might save some." (I Cor. 9:22).
8. The early church. Throughout the book of Acts we see
individual churches expressing their faith in a variety of patterns. It is important to
realize, however, that when a church or individual follows the leading of the Lord, it
does not guarantee deliverance. In the book of Hebrews (chapter 11) we see some faithful
saints delivered, and some allowed to suffer. The key seems to be obedience and
flexibility under the leading of the Holy Spirit.
The extreme flexibility of the church and individual Christians in
these biblical examples is evident in their responses to persecution. Compare the church
at Jerusalem and the church at Antioch, for example. The church at Jerusalem was made up
primarily of Jewish converts. They continued to express their faith in the traditional
Jewish ways, in so far as these traditions did not nullify the Gospel. The church at
Antioch was made up of Gentile converts who did not have the background of Jewish
traditions. Their fellowship grew up with a less ritualistic style. A conference was
called in Jerusalem to determine whether the Antioch church should be required to follow
the Jewish traditions. After a lengthy discussion it was decided that Gentile Christians
should be free to express their faith as the Lord led, with a few small limitations, while
the Jerusalem church continued in its Jewish traditions (Acts 15:1-35; 21:17-26). Keep in
mind that the church of New Testament times was a church in a hostile environment. The
Roman government encouraged persecution throughout the whole western world. Yet
Christianity triumphed and outlived its persecutors! Please consider again the various
options in Part C.
Suggested Discussion Questions:
1. In the examples given, what were the limits of flexibility? [Refer
to Acts 15:29].
2. What are some man made "limits of flexibility" you have
seen in practice?
* * * * *
Back to the top
Part C
Those that seek to operate as a "Co-existing Church" may
become merely a propaganda tool of the government, but the known leaders often have little
choice. They must cooperate with the government, or they will be imprisoned. The civil
authorities will be the ones to decide if this type of church will be allowed to exist.
You can be certain that if its existence is tolerated, the reason is that it is serving
some purpose the authorities desire. The authorities will infiltrate this type of church
at all levels, and use it as they see fit. The church finds itself in the position of
attempting to please the government and remain true the teaching of scripture in its
public witness. Those who attempt to co-exist are usually held suspect by both the
government and the other Christian groups. It is a very difficult position for true
Christians, but it may be that they can serve a real purpose through their public witness.
We should uphold the co-existing church in prayer, asking the Lord to keep their witness
clear and to prevent them from being a hindrance to other Christians.
The "Protest Church" can have a beautiful witness, as long as
it survives. Review the three conditions that make this option possible. In many Asian and
middle eastern countries these conditions do not exist. In some countries a protest church
movement survived only very briefly following the takeover of the country by
anti-Christian forces. In North Korea, for example, although there was a strong Christian
minority before World War II, it is very difficult to identify any Christian movement
there at the present time. It is possible that there is an underground church, but no
protest church exits any longer.
In Myanmar [formerly known as Burma], the Christian movement was a
strong minority, and it has continued to function. In fact, all three options of Christian
Church mentioned above can be found in that country today. But it claims to be a
Socialist, not a Communist, state. General Ne Win's government was not committed to the
complete eradication of religion, as were the traditional Communists. Christians are under
heavy pressure in Myanmar, however, and many leaders have been arrested because the
government claims the Christians are partners with those forces fighting against its
authority.
In Nepal, the situation is quite different. The state religion is
Hinduism. Christianity is theoretically permitted, but Christians are not supposed to make
converts of Hindus. Christians there have protested this restriction for years and
attempted to find ways around it.
The "Underground Church" may seem less glamorous, but it has
able to continue in some heavily restricted countries for many years. Known leaders,
whether clergy or layman, were not able to follow this option, but small groups are rarely
noticed by the authorities. Often "house churches," "cell groups" or
"family churches" can remain underground for an extended period of time, and
even regroup once they are discovered. These small fellowships, usually 2 to 8 adults, can
arrange brief meetings to encourage one another and carry on the functions of the church.
The Christians in China can teach us many beautiful lessons about this kind of Christian
life. They have learned to encourage one another with a simple nod as they meet in the
fields, or in a quiet gathering as they "sing" the words of a song soundlessly
together. They can sometimes identify one another simply by their love and concern for
others. They pray that their lives will radiate such peace that troubled friends and
neighbors will seek them out and they will have the opportunity to share Christ.
Of course, the "underground" Christians must also be ready to
face persecution if they are discovered. But their quiet lives of faith will have well
equipped them for that possibility. If the underground churches really make a clean break
with the institutional style meetings, they will be very difficult for the authorities to
destroy. Groups must be kept small, and as the Holy Spirit leads others to join a church,
it should be divided. It is best for groups to be in a small geographical area. If the
group is discovered it may be punished for holding an illegal meeting, but the authorities
may not realize it as a church, and the members can simply scatter and begin small
meetings again in other places. In China, many Christians who worship the Lord in
underground fellowships do not want to even know the names of other Christians outside
their own group. They feel that they cannot be pressured to reveal things they do not
know. On the other hand, some Chinese Christian groups like to gather informally in public
places on holidays, just for the encouragement. They do nothing that would identify them
as Christians or single out their group. They just enjoy seeing many people that they know
are secret Christians.
The most serious limitation of the "Underground Church,"
however, is the fact that in a society where most born again believers are
"underground," very few of the populous will ever come face to face with the
claims of Christ! While even underground Christians must be open to the Lords
leading to share Christ selectively, it becomes the special responsibility of Christians
in the free world to see that every possible means, such as international Christian radio,
in used to take the gospel across the borders to the masses of every closed and restricted
country.
Suggested Discussion Questions:
1. Of the three options given (co-existing church, protest church,
underground church), well known Christian leaders can really only participate in two. Why?
2. Review the three conditions that are necessary for the protest
church to be able to exist. Do either point two or point three apply to your home area?
3. What could you be doing now to be prepared to function as an
underground church in the future?
* * * * *
Back to the top
Part D
While the leaders of the Co-existing Church and the Protesting Church
are constantly watched, the lay witnesses of the Underground Church have more freedom to
move about, and often other small cells spring up from their cautious witness. We must
remind ourselves, however, that all three of these options may be valid expressions of
Christian faith. One group should not allow itself to turn against the others simply
because they are expressing their faith in different manner. Sometimes the Lord leads a
group to change its approach. A Protest Church may be so persecuted that its lay members
quietly become an underground fellowship, or an underground group may be exposed to the
authorities and it must become a protest church. And there may be other options being
followed in restricted countries of which we are not even aware. The Holy Spirit is not
limited. He may lead you and your fellowship into a different form or into a combination
of these forms. Some Co-existing Churches quietly encourage cell groups and house churches
among their members.
These combinations are found in many countries. Once we are aware that
the Holy Spirit may be leading some Christians to co-exist, some to protest, and some to
go underground, it will be easier to love and respect all Christians. Too often the
attacks of one Christian group upon another have become good propaganda material for the
repressive authorities. Of course, there can be no fellowship with those who deny Christ
or pervert the gospel, but if a professing believer breaks under persecution and denies
the Lord, other believers should try to be understanding. They must note the failure, and
be very cautious in future contacts with that person. But no public attack or display of
righteous indignation is needed. If love and respect can be maintained between all
Christians, the possibilities for mutual assistance are greatly increased. One big benefit
will be simply the encouragement of knowing that your church fellowship is not standing
alone.
One of the tricks that the Communists liked to use against Christians
was to try turn them against each other and break down their fellowship. In China in the
years before the Cultural Revolution when there were still some open Christians, it became
standard policy that two known Christians would not be allowed to work together. In
Vietnam, the churches that have been allowed to remain open are widely scattered and it
was very difficult for Christians to get together. Inter-church retreats and rallies were
forbidden. The Communists realized that the less Christians were allowed to fellowship,
the more likely they would begin to doubt that others were staying true to the Lord, and
their own faith would be weakened. According to Jesus teaching, Christians are to be known
for their love for one another (Jn. 13:35). If we are faithful to this principle, the
enemy will not be able to turn us against one another, and our church will survive
victoriously!
Suggested Discussion Questions:
1. Why is it important to realize that other Christians may react to
oppression in other ways than we do, and both of us be right?
2. Discuss this guideline used by a Christian group in China,
"Love all brothers in Christ. Trust only those you know have stood the testing."
* * * * * * *
Back to the top | Back to the
content page