Few points to mention:

1-  Notice how Sam Shamoun's English translation is all twisted.  The word "Lord" is mixed and scrambled between Jesus and his Creator, GOD Almighty, the ULTIMATE LORD!  The trinitarian liars invented these cheap tricks to decieve [sic] the ordinary and simple-minded readers, who follow blindly and don't bother to reason, to prove the polytheist trinity pagan lie.  Here is what Allah Almighty Said about them in the Noble Quran:

"Know they not Allah Knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal? And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book (i.e., the Bible), but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture.  Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,' To traffic with it for a miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby.   (The Noble Quran, 2:77-78)"

RESPONSE:

It is actually Osama who is now lying and inventing cheap tricks to deceive the ordinary and simple-minded readers into following his non-existent, man-made god, failing to prove that Islam is true, and even dares to twist his own book, the Quran. Osama is blatantly lying here regarding the intent and meaning of surah 2:77-78.

Osama is evidently trying to use this passage to cast doubt on the authenticity of the Bible. But let us see what happens when we read this passage in its context. It seems that we need to teach Osama how to interpret and understand his own religious text:

"Can you (O men of faith) still earnestly desire that they (the Jews) will believe in you? And verily a party (fariq) among them hear the Word of God, then they pervert it knowingly after they have understood it. And when they meet the believers they say, ‘We believe,’ but when they meet each other in private they say, ‘Why do you tell them what God has revealed to you (in the Torah), that they may engage you in argument about it before their God? What do you not understand?’ Do they not know that God knows what they conceal and what they make public? Among them are unlettered folk who know the Scripture not except from hearsay. THEY BUT GUESS." S. 2:75-78

Once the passage is read in its proper context, we discover that it is not speaking of Jews and Christians corrupting their Holy Book, but rather unlettered Jews who were ignorant of the content of the scriptures who then falsified their own revelation for gain.

Some Muslims claim that S. 2:79 is referring to a different group from those mentioned in 2:78 since the group in 2:78 are said to be unlettered (ummiyuuna), implying that they couldn’t read or write. Based on this assertion, it is then claimed that these unlettered folk wouldn’t be able to write anything with their hands, and hence cannot be the same folk mentioned in S. 2:79.

This interpretation is based on a gross misunderstanding of what the term ‘unlettered’ actually means. A careful reading of the Quran shows that this term doesn’t necessarily refer to people who couldn’t read or write. Rather, it refers to people who were unfamiliar with the inspired Books of God. Note for instance the following passage:

He it is Who hath sent among the unlettered ones (ummiyyeena) a messenger of their own, to recite unto them His revelations and to make them grow, and to teach them the Scripture and wisdom, though heretofore they were indeed in error manifest, S. 62:2 Pickthall

Unlettered here cannot literally mean that Muhammad was sent to people who couldn’t read or write, since there were hundreds of Arabs who were reading and writing both before and during Muhammad’s time. In fact, Muslim traditions assert that Muhammad had Arab scribes who would write down the Quran for him.

The meaning of unlettered becomes clear from the following passages:

If they argue with you, then say, "I have simply submitted myself to GOD; I and those who follow me." You shall proclaim to those who received the scripture, as well as those who did not (ummiyyeena), "Would you submit?" If they submit, then they have been guided, but if they turn away, your sole mission is to deliver this message. GOD is Seer of all people. S. 3:20 Khalifa

And this is a Book which We have revealed as a blessing: so follow it and be righteous, that ye may receive mercy: Lest ye should say: "The Book was sent down to two Peoples before us, and for our part, we remained unacquainted with all that they learned by assiduous study:" Or lest ye should say: "If the Book had only been sent down to us, we should have followed its guidance better than they." Now then hath come unto you a clear (sign) from your Lord, - and a guide and a mercy: then who could do more wrong than one who rejecteth Allah's signs, and turneth away therefrom? In good time shall We requite those who turn away from Our signs, with a dreadful penalty, for their turning away. S. 6:155-157

Some assert that Muhammad was called unlettered in the sense that he didn’t know how to read or write (cf. S. 7:157-158).

Again, the Quran explains in what sense Muhammad was unlettered:

And thou (O Muhammad) wast not a reader of any scripture before it, nor didst thou write it with thy right hand, for then might those have doubted, who follow falsehood. But it is clear revelations in the hearts of those who have been given knowledge, and none deny Our revelations save wrong-doers. S. 28:48-49 Pickthall

Muhammad is unlettered, not in the sense that he couldn’t read or write, but that he hadn’t read or written down any revealed Scripture prior to his allegedly "receiving" the Quran. This is a view with which many Muslims wholeheartedly agree. (Cf. http://www.quran.org/ap28.htm, http://www.quran.org/gatut.html)

This is precisely what S. 2:78-79 is saying, namely that a group who were unlettered, in the sense of not knowing the scriptures, personally decided to concoct their own false revelation for gain.

Al-Tabari provides some support for this proposed interpretation by citing Ibn Abbas. Muslim turned atheist Ibn Warraq, while writing about the different definitions proposed by scholars regarding the meaning of ummiyyun, says:

"Bell thinks 'ummiyyun means belonging to the 'ummah or community, while Blachere translates it as ‘Gentiles,’ in the sense of ‘pagan.’ For the French scholar it is clear that the word 'ummi designates pagan Arabs, who, unlike the Jews and Christians, had not received any revelation and were thus living in ignorance of the divine law. Tabari does indeed quote some traditions that give this sense to the word ummi: according to Ibn 'Abbas, ‘'ummiyyun (refers to) some people who did not believe in a prophet sent by God, nor in a scripture revealed by God; and they wrote a scripture with their own hands. Then they said to the ignorant, common people: "This is from God."’ However, Tabari himself does not accept this interpretation, instead gives a totally unconvincing and improbable account of the derivation of the word: ‘I am of the opinion that an illiterate person is called ummi, relating him in his lack of ability to write to his mother (umm), because writing was something which men, and not women, did, so that a man who could not write and form letters was linked to his mother, and not to his father, in his ignorance of writing.’" (Warraq, "Introduction," What the Koran Really Says, Language, Text & Commentary [Prometheus Books, 2002; ISBN: 157392945X], p. 44; underline emphasis ours)

Others believe that ‘unlettered’ actually refers to the Gentiles, i.e. that Muhammad was a Gentile prophet who was supposedly sent to the Gentile communities (cf. http://www.mostmerciful.com/ummi.htm).

Furthermore, even if it were speaking of Bible corruption, this still wouldn’t prove the Muslim claim. The text says that only a party of them wrote false revelation and sold it for gain. The Quran says that there were others who would not allow the revelation to be tampered with for the sake of monetary profit:

"And there are, certainly, among the People of the Book, those who believe in God, and that which has been revealed to you, in that which has been revealed to them, bowing in humility to God. They will not sell the signs of God for miserable gain. For them is a reward with their Lord, and God is swift in account." S. 3:199

And:

Those unto whom We have given the Scripture, WHO READ IT WITH THE RIGHT READING, those believe in it. And whoso disbelieveth in it, those are they who are the losers. S. 2:121 Pickthall

THEY ARE NOT ALL ALIKE. Of the People of the Scripture there is a staunch community who recite the revelations of Allah in the night season, falling prostrate (before Him). They believe in Allah and the Last Day, and enjoin right conduct and forbid indecency, and vie one with another in good works. These are of the righteous. S. 3:113-114 Pickthall

These passages presuppose that the Jews and Christians had uncorrupt copies of the Holy Bible in their possession, otherwise they wouldn’t have been able to read it correctly.

Thus, surah 2:79 in no way proves that Jews and Christians corrupted the Bible to the extent that it no longer accurately preserves and reflects what was originally written.

Now, if Osama is merely saying that there was a group that tried to tamper with the Bible, whether by corrupting the text or by misinterpretation, no more no less, than we would have to agree. There have been people who pretended to be true believers that tried tampering with God's pure Word. But in light of the fact that there were thousands of copies circulating in the possession of hundreds, and thousands, of Jews and Christians all throughout the world, who loved the Bible and believed it to be the very Word of God, trying to then corrupt the Bible wholesale would take a miracle. It would entail that all these Jews and Christians agree to allow their Scriptures to be corrupted in the same exact places, or for the corrupters to get a hold of every single manuscript in order to insure that all the texts reflected the same corruptions in the same exact places. This is utterly improbable, if not downright impossible.

Furthermore, this same charge can be levelled against Muslims, since Muslim records show that there were individuals, like Uthman, who corrupted the Quran and even burned primary codices. The Quran even refers to such corruption:

Like as We sent down on the dividers Those who made the Quran INTO SHREDS." S. 15:90-91

Scholar in Islamic studies Alphonse Mingana comments on this passage:

"Finally, if we understand correctly the following verse of Suratul-Hijr (xv. 90-91): ‘As we sent down upon (punished) the dividers (of the Scripture?) who broke up the Koran into parts,’ we are tempted to state that even when the Prophet was alive, some changes were noticed in the recital of certain verses of his sacred book. There is nothing very surprising in this fact, since Muhammad could not read or write, and was at the mercy of friends for the writing of his revelations, or, more frequently, of some mercenary amanuenses." (Mingana, "Three Ancient Korans", The Origins of the Koran - Classic Essays on Islam’s Holy Book, ed. by Ibn Warraq [Prometheus Books, Amherst NY, 1998], p. 84; bold emphasis ours)

Mingana records the Muslim reaction to Uthman's burning and wholesale destruction of primary, competing Quranic codices:

"The book, drawn up by this method, continued to be authoritative and the standard text till 29-30 A.H. under the caliphate of 'Uthman. At this time the wonderful faithfulness of Arab memory was defective, and according to a general weakness of human nature, the Believers have been heard reciting the verses of the Koran in a different way. This fact was due specially, it is said, to the hundreds of dialects used in Arabia. Zaid was again asked to put an end to these variations which had begun to scandalize the votaries of the Prophet. That indefatigable compiler, assisted by three men from the tribe of Quraish, started to do what he had already done more than fifteen years before. The previous copies made from the first one written under Abu Bakr were all destroyed by special order of the caliph: the revelation sent down from heaven was one, and the book containing this revelation must be one. The critic remarks that the only guarantee of the authenticity of the Koran is the testimony of Zaid; and for this reason, a scholar who doubts whether a given word has been really used by Muhammad, or whether it has been only employed by Zaid on his own authority, or on the meagre testimony of some Arab reciters, does not transgress the strict laws of high criticism. If the memory of the followers of the Prophet has been found defective from the year 15 to 30 A.H. when Islam was proclaimed over all Arabia, why may it not have been defective from 612 to 632 C.E. when the Prophet was often obliged to defend his own life against terrible aggressors? And if the first recension of Zaid contained always the actual words of Muhammad, why was this compiler not content with re-establishing it in its entirety, and why was the want of a new recension felt by 'Uthman? How can it be that in the short space of fifteen years such wonderful variants could have crept into the few copies preceding the reign of the third caliph that he found himself bound to destroy all those he could find? If 'Uthman was certainly inspired only by religious purposes, why did his enemies call him ‘THE TEARER OF THE BOOKS’ and why did they fasten on him the following stigma: ‘He found the Korans many and left one; HE TORE UP THE BOOK’? ..." (Ibn Warraq, p. 85; bold and capital emphasis ours)

Mingana, in his article The Transmission of the Koran, cites Muslim historian al-Tabari:

"... ‘Ali b. Abi Talib, and ‘Uthman b. Affan wrote the Revelation to the Prophet; but in their absence it was Ubai b. Ka’b and Zaid b. Thabit who wrote it.’ He informs us, too, that the people said to ‘Uthman: ‘The Koran was in many books, and thou discreditedst them all but one’; and after the Prophet's death, ‘People gave him as successor Abu Bakr, who in turn was succeeded by ‘Umar; and both of them acted according to the Book and the Sunnah of the Apostle of God- and praise be to God the Lord of the worlds; then people elected ‘Uthman b. ‘Affan WHO ... TORE UP THE BOOK.’" (Ibn Warraq, p. 102; bold and capital emphasis ours)

The preceding data shows that the Quran has in fact been tampered with, suffering textual corruption, a fact admitted by both Muslim and non-Muslim sources alike.

Osama continues:

2-  Here are the Romans 10:9-13 and Joel 2:32 verses that Sam Shamoun gave from the King James Version Bible:

Romans 10
9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

Joel 2
32 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call.

To the Reader:   Where in these verses do you see Jesus being called GOD Almighty or Yahweh?!

RESPONSE:

Here is where we see Jesus being called God Almighty and Yahweh:

"because, if you CONFESS with your lips THAT JESUS IS LORD and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For man believes with his heart and so is justified, and he confesses with his lips and so is saved. The scripture says, ‘No one who believes in him will be put to shame.’ For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; the same Lord is Lord of all and bestows his riches upon ALL WHO CALL UPON HIM. For, ‘every one who calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved.’" Romans 10:9-13

The context clearly shows that the Lord, whom a person must call on for salvation, is the very Lord whom believers must confess, namely Jesus. Still not convinced? Well then, let us make it even clearer:

"Why? Because they did not pursue it through faith, but as if it were based on works. They have stumbled over the stumbling stone, as it is written, "Behold, I am laying in Zion a stone that will make men stumble, a rock that will make them fall; and he who believes in him will not be put to shame.’" Roman 9:32-33

According to the above, the One whom believers are not put to shame for believing in is the Lord Jesus, the very One whom Jews stumbled over. This serves to identify Christ as the Lord of Romans 10:11. Again, in Romans we read:

"If we live, we live to the Lord, and if we die, we die to the Lord; so then, whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's. For to this end Christ died and lived again, that he might be Lord both of the dead and of the living. Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God; for it is written, ‘As I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall give praise to God.’ So each of us shall give account of himself to God.’" Romans 14:8-11

According to Paul, Jesus rose from the dead so that he might be the Lord of both the living and the dead, indicating that the One whom Paul said was Lord of all in Romans 10:12 is this same Lord Jesus. Furthermore, Paul says here that we all must stand before God’s judgment seat and that every tongue and knee will bow before the Lord God. Paul says elsewhere that the Lord God, whom we will have to stand before in judgment, the One whom all will bow to and praise, is actually Jesus Christ:

"For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive good or evil, according to what he has done in the body." 2 Corinthians 5:10

"Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." Philippians 2:9-11

Note again the implication of the preceding statements:

1. Every knee will bow before God and stand before his judgment seat.
2. Every knee will bow before Jesus and stand before his judgment seat.
3. Therefore, Jesus is God.

It’s not over yet. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 1:2, says that Christians everywhere called upon the name of the Lord Jesus:

"To the church of God which is at Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints together with all those who IN EVERY PLACE CALL ON THE NAME OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, both their Lord and ours:"

Now contrast this with Romans 10:13 again:

"For, ‘every one who CALLS UPON THE NAME OF THE LORD will be saved.’"

We’re just beginning. Notice what else Paul says about the Lord Jesus:

For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh… But you are not in the flesh, you are IN the Spirit, if in fact the Spirit of God DWELLS IN YOU. Any one who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him. But if Christ is IN YOU, although your bodies are dead because of sin, your spirits are alive because of righteousness. Romans 8:3, 9-10

"to them belong the patriarchs, and from them, according to the flesh, comes the Messiah, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen." Romans 9:5 NRSV

Paul, in these passages, affirms the following things about Jesus:

1. He was God’s Son even before he appeared in the likeness of sinful flesh.
2. God’s Spirit is also Christ’s Spirit, implying a unity and coequality between the Father and the Son.
3. Christ, like the Holy Spirit, lives in all believers, indicating that Christ is omnipresent. Since omnipresence is a divine quality, this shows that Paul believed Jesus is God.
4. Paul confirms this conclusion by stating that Christ is God over all, and also has a human ancestry that stems from Israel. Hence, according to Paul, Christ is both God and man, divine and human, at the same time.

Osama next asserts:

3-  Paul, who wrote the book of Romans, never even met Jesus in person, nor was he ever from among Jesus' 12 disciples.  Paul claimed that Jesus came to him while he was on his way to Damascus and annointed [sic] him to be an apostle. However, many, even Christian theologians, reject Paul and his false books.

RESPONSE:

This is coming from a gent who follows a man that never met Jesus, nor was able to prove that he was a real prophet of God. Please listen to our debate for the details: http://abrahamic-faith.com/debates.html.

Paul, on the other hand, was confirmed supernaturally by God Almighty through signs and wonders, and had the Apostles of Christ personally testifying to his apostleship:

"But Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues at Damascus, so that if he found any belonging to the Way, men or women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem. Now as he journeyed he approached Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven flashed about him. And he fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’ And he said, ‘Who are you, Lord?’ And he said, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting; but rise and enter the city, and you will be told what you are to do.’ … So Anani'as departed and entered the house. And laying his hands on him he said, ‘Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus who appeared to you on the road by which you came, has sent me that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.’ And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes and he regained his sight. Then he rose and was baptized, and took food and was strengthened. For several days he was with the disciples at Damascus." Acts 9:1-6, 17-19

"In Christ Jesus, then, I have reason to be proud of my work for God. For I will not venture to speak of anything except what Christ has wrought through me to win obedience from the Gentiles, by word and deed, by the power of signs and wonders, by the power of the Holy Spirit, so that from Jerusalem and as far round as Illyr'icum I have fully preached the gospel of Christ," Romans 15:17-19

"Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are not you my workmanship in the Lord? If to others I am not an apostle, at least I am to you; for you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord." 1 Corinthians 9:1-2

"The signs of a true apostle were performed among you in all patience, with signs and wonders and mighty works." 2 Corinthians 12:12

"And count the forbearance of our Lord as salvation. So also our beloved brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, speaking of this as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures." 2 Peter 3:15-16

Even the earliest Muslim writers affirmed Paul’s discipleship:

And there are no GENUINE Christian theologians that deny Paul’s Apostleship. There may be liberals that claim to be believers that do so, but these same liberals can be used to refute and expose Muhammad as a fraud. See the following articles for the evidence:

OSAMA ON JESUS’ CITATION OF PSALM 8:2

Jesus in Matthew 21:12-17 was only quoting the Old Testament when he said "‘It is written, "My house shall be called a house of prayer"; but you make it a den of robbers.’"  He wasn't saying that it was his house, or he is GOD Almighty Himself.

Also, Psalm 8:1-2 is not a [sic] directly connected to the praise that Jesus received in the temple, because:

1-  There were no infants or babes in there.

2-  Jesus again ONLY QUOTED the Old Testament and Jesus was directing the praise to GOD Almighty.

3-  No one in that incident called Jesus GOD Almighty.  This is only in the twisted mind of the polytheist trinitarian pagans.

RESPONSE:

Jesus was only quoting the OT? Really? And there were no infants around? Again, really? Is that why the context says otherwise?

"But when the chief priests and the scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, AND THE CHILDREN CRYING OUT IN THE TEMPLE, "Hosanna TO THE Son of David!’ they were indignant; and they said to him, ‘Do you hear what these are saying?’ And Jesus said to them, ‘Yes; have you never read, "Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast brought perfect praise"?’ Matthew 21:15-16

So children do not include infants? Says whom? Doesn’t the word children also include infants, or are infants considered adults and therefore do not come under the classification of children?

As the text shows, the chief priests and scribes were irate over the children directing their praise TO Jesus, since they would have no problem with the children praising God. Jesus is quoting the passage to silence the chief priests and scribes for complaining that the children were praising him. Christ was essentially telling them that the children’s praise of his own person was justifiable since they were fulfilling what Scripture said would happen when children are in the presence of God. And since Jesus is God in the flesh, they were doing the only logical thing that should be done, namely praise their God who was now standing before them as a man!

But again, this is the best Osama can do.

OSAMA ON 1 PETER

Osama chants:

First of all, 1 Peter 2:3-4 above says ".....but in God's sight chosen and precious;".  This verse is clearly separating Jesus from his Creator, GOD Almighty.

Also, Psalm 34:8 above is praising those who seek refuge in GOD Almighty.   Interestingly, Muslims before the recitation of the Noble Quran are commanded to always seek refuge in GOD Almighty from satan.

Thus far, the polytheist trinitarian pagan poor Sam Shamoun has proven absolutely nothing!!  On the contrary, he lied and twisted Hebrews 1:9 as clearly shown above to prove his pagan lie.

I feel sorry for him and for the likes of him.  He constantly says "if LORD Jesus is willing".  He is guilty in profaning GOD Almighty's Holy Name and putting a creation's name above the LORD GOD Almighty.  Sam Shamoun and the likes of him from the polytheist pagans are guilty of blasphemy, and I pray that he and every pagan who reads this paper to repent and seek forgiveness from GOD Almighty and to embrace Islam, the only Truth today to Praise and Glorify GOD Almighty, because we associate no partners created from dust and wood with Him!

RESPONSE:

It is really tiresome and sad that we must constantly spell things out for Osama in order for him to get the point. Osama thinks that since Jesus is distinguished from God, he cannot also be God. Osama has read enough of our articles and refutations to know what we believe regarding the Trinity of God and the Incarnation of the Lord Jesus. Let us again repeat our position. The one, true eternal God exists as a tri-personal Being, meaning that there is more than one Person who is God. Jesus is consistently distinguished from God for the simple fact that Jesus is not the only Person of God; the Father and the Holy Spirit are also Persons of God.

In the context of 1 Peter, the inspired Apostle is distinguishing the Lord Jesus from his Father, and since Jesus is not the Father, this poses no real threat to orthodox Trinitarian beliefs. In fact, the doctrine of the Trinity entails the belief in the personal distinction between the Father and the Son. This, therefore, means that Osama is attacking a straw man here either because he doesn’t know what we believe as Trinitarians (which we highly doubt) or is deliberately distorting our beliefs in order to deceive his readers.

Osama’s comment that Psalm 34:8 refers to God misses the point entirely. Osama doesn’t want to get the fact that since Peter applied this Psalm to Jesus, this means that Peter believed that Jesus is God! Again, it seems we need to put this in the form of a syllogism:

1. Psalm 34:8 refers to Yahweh God.
2. Peter applies Psalm 34:8 to the Lord Jesus.
3. Therefore, Peter believed that the Lord Jesus is Yahweh God!

This is really basic and simple, and doesn’t take an Einstein to understand it.

And here is why I choose to address Jesus as Lord:

"But even if you do suffer for righteousness' sake, you will be blessed. Have no fear of them, nor be troubled, but in your hearts reverence Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to make a defense to any one who calls you to account for the hope that is in you, yet do it with gentleness and reverence; and keep your conscience clear, so that, when you are abused, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame. 1 Peter 3:14-16

We now repeat Osama’s own words against him:

Thus far, the polytheist pagan idol worshiper Osama Abdallah has absolutely failed to refute anything!!  On the contrary, he has deliberately lied and twisted what the Holy Bible and the doctrine of the Trinity teach, and got exposed for trying to use Hebrews 1:9 to disprove the glorious truth of God’s Triunity. It seems that Osama would rather believe his pagan lie than in the true, Triune God of the Holy Bible.

And we do hope that Osama will repent of his false religion, and refrain from insulting and blaspheming the true God by his worship of the false god of the Quran. We hope that he will read this paper and be convicted of his pagan worship and seek the forgiveness of the true God, Yahweh, by embracing Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior. Hopefully he, and other Muslims, will refrain from being mutilators of the true God by their denial of his glorious Triunity, and no longer insult him by claiming that Muhammad was his prophet.

OSAMA ON ISAIAH 11

A further indication that Osama isn’t qualified to write arguments against the Bible, or articles defending his false religion, is his habit of consistently repeating the same point over and over again ad infinitum. This is what we call Osama’s Mantra Syndrome, a disease for which it seems that no cure is forthcoming.

Osama lives under the delusion that by repeating himself a certain number of times, he will somehow turn his lies into facts, or at least convince his readers that he is speaking the truth. Note for instance how many times Osama repeats the same point throughout his alleged rebuttal:

My response:

Before I let you continue, let me first point out few major problems with this verse since trinitarians are naturally inclined toward polytheism, paganism and idol worship:

1-  The verse says "Righteous Branch".  Is GOD Almighty a branch or one that comes from anyone's blood line?

2-  Jesus was called a "Branch" in other places in the Old Testament.  But this time, let's see how much of a GOD Jesus really is:

1.  A shoot will come up from the stump of Jesse; from his roots a Branch will bear fruit.
2.  The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him (Jesus)-- the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the Spirit of
counsel and of power, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD (Jesus fearing his GOD)--
3.  and he will delight in the fear of the LORD. He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes, or
decide by what he hears with his ears;

(From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 11:1-3)

Also, please visit:  The Spirit of GOD Almighty came upon others before and after Jesus in the Bible.

If Jesus is truly GOD Almighty, then how can the spirit of fearing GOD Almighty be put in him?  What is the Wisdom from GOD Almighty to put the spirit of fearing Himself inside Himself?

Again:

My response:

This is all fine, except that it doesn't make Jesus the Creator of the Universe.   Again, this branch that was mentioned in Isaiah was said to also have the spirit of fearing GOD Almighty in him:

1.  A shoot will come up from the stump of Jesse; from his roots a Branch will bear fruit.
2.  The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him (Jesus)-- the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the Spirit of
counsel and of power, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD (Jesus fearing his GOD)--
3.  and he will delight in the fear of the LORD. He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes, or
decide by what he hears with his ears;

(From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 11:1-3)

Also, please visit:  The Spirit of GOD Almighty came upon others before and after Jesus in the Bible.

Again, if Jesus is truly GOD Almighty, then how can the spirit of fearing GOD Almighty be put in him?  What is the Wisdom from GOD Almighty to put the spirit of fearing Himself inside Himself?

The fact that this "Branch" or final Messiah or king or person will have the spirit of fearing GOD Almighty in him clearly and irrefutably means that he is only a creation from GOD Almighty and not GOD Almighty Himself, no matter how high your polytheist pagan theology tries to elate him.

And again:

My response:

This point had been refuted above, because there is nothing unique about the Messiah's title.  Like I said above, let me point out few major problems with this verse since trinitarians are naturally inclined toward polytheism, paganism and idol worship:

1-  The verse says "Righteous Branch".  Is GOD Almighty a branch or one that comes from anyone's blood line?

2-  Jesus was called a "Branch" in other places in the Old Testament.  But this time, let's see how much of a GOD Jesus really is:

1.  A shoot will come up from the stump of Jesse; from his roots a Branch will bear fruit.
2.  The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him (Jesus)-- the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the Spirit of
counsel and of power, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD (Jesus fearing his GOD)--
3.  and he will delight in the fear of the LORD. He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes, or
decide by what he hears with his ears;

(From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 11:1-3)

Also, please visit:  The Spirit of GOD Almighty came upon others before and after Jesus in the Bible.

If Jesus is truly GOD Almighty, then how can the spirit of fearing GOD Almighty be put in him?  What is the Wisdom from GOD Almighty to put the spirit of fearing Himself inside Himself?