|
YUKSEL.ORG
· Home
· Resume
· Law &
Politics
· Philosophy
· RELIGION
· Paranormal
· Language
· Children
· Rainbow
· Books
· Guest
Articles
· Contact
· Discussion
19.org
|
Eternal Hell
and
Merciful God
(Please feel free
to distribute and publish this article in any form, provided that you will
publish it fully together with its copyright reference.)
Edip Yuksel*
© 2003 yuksel.org
As a monotheist, I have compelling scientific, philosophic and spiritual
reasons to believe in the Quran, yet I have to admit that I have not digested
all the verses of the Quran. Some verses challenge my cultural norms or the
mainstream ideology, and a few also appear to contradict other clear verses
of the scripture and/or the laws of nature. Knowing that my culture is
relative, I usually handle well the first category, but those that create
contradiction among God's signs (ayaat) of the
scripture or of nature act like viruses infecting my faith. Those who have no
intellectual problem with any verses of the Quran are, in my opinion, either
gullible people who happened to inherit/acquire their faith because of peer
pressure, geographic proximity, or any other extraneous reason; or they are
hiding their intellectual problems from others and perhaps from even their
own cognition. Neither type, however, can set a good example.
My doubt is not about the veracity of the Quran, but about the veracity of
my understanding of some verses of the Quran. Since I rejected Sunni precepts
that require blindly following the opinion of orthodox scholars and clerics,
and since I accepted the Quran as the only source of my religion, whenever I
encounter a problem with my understanding of a verse that puts it at cross
with 4:82, I follow the divine advice to act patiently in seeking knowledge
(20:114), ask the experts (21:7) without following them blindly (17:36),
avoid wishful thinking and hearsay (53:28), and know that God is the one who
will ultimately provide explanation (75:16-19). Sometimes, I attain a
coherent understanding within months, but sometimes it takes years and even
decades. Each of my intellectual and spiritual experience is a testimony to
the following facts:
"We have brought them a book that we have detailed
with knowledge to be a guidance and mercy for the people who believe." (7:52)
"The Gracious. Teaches the Quran." (55:1-2)
Before sharing with you my observation about the duration of Hell, I would
like to share with you several examples of my intellectual struggle and their
results. (If you do not have patience with this lengthy preparatory
introduction, please jump to the subtitle Is Hell Eternal.)
For instance, my inquiry on 5:38 evolving about fifteen years resulted in
three understanding,: (a) cutting or marking a thief's hand as a means of
public humiliation and identification, (b) physically cutting off a thief's
hand, or (c) cutting off a thief's means to steal and burglarize (presumably
through rehabilitation or imprisonment). Depending on the economic and social
circumstances, frequency of theft, its risk to the society, and the economic,
social and psychological cost of punishment, a society may pick any of the
suggested punishments. In other words, I am now convinced that the deliberate
use of a semantically flexible key word, QaTTa'A is
to accommodate time, mood, culture, and circumstances of diverse populations.
Freezing the message of the Quran with the understanding and practice of the
first generation (including Prophet Muhammad and his companions) is stripping
the Quran from its prophetic divine nature that makes its message universal.
My inquiry on the apparent contradiction between 2:233 and 46:15, within
several months led me to a conclusion that I never wished to reach: taking
the normal length of pregnancy as 266 days (or 38 weeks), within 86 days of
pregnancy abortion would not be considered murder. In the first trimester,
fetus was not considered as a person. Becoming a person is with the emergence
of consciousness (that is, Nafs, which is usually
wrongly translated as Soul because of Plato's influence on later Muslim
scholars). Personhood is described as the stage of "new creation"
that follows the stages of being a sperm, embryo, bite-size fetus forming
bones and flesh, and finally a new creature (23:14; 22:5). My problem with
the traditional understanding of 4:34 and reconciling it with 30:21 was
solved within a year through research and "accidental" events. I
learned that men were not rulers over women, but providers for them; women
were described not as devotees of their husbands, but of their Creator; the
issue was not disobedience to husband but disloyalty to the marriage
contract; and husbands were not advised to beat their wives, but were advised
to separate from them before deciding on divorce.
Similarly, my problem with reconciling traditional understanding of 4:3
and 4:129 was solved decades later when I noticed a universal mistranslation
of a phrase in 4:127. Though the Quran permits polygamy (4:3), it discourages
and restricts its actual practice by requiring significant preconditions: men
may marry more than one wife only if the later ones are widows with orphans,
and they should treat each wife equally and fairly. (See 4:19-20, 127-129.)
Unfortunately, verse 4:127 has been traditionally misinterpreted and
mistranslated in such a way as to suggest that God permits marriage with
juvenile orphans. This was clearly not the case.
Let me give you one more example. I had problem with the traditional
mistranslation of a key word in verse 2:106, since it implied contradiction
in the Quran and made any verse in the Quran a vulnerable subject to the
claim of abrogation. The word "ayaat",
the plural of "ayah," is used in the Quran to mean both (a)
signs/miracles, and (b) verses/revelations of the Quran itself. Since verses
of the Quran are considered to be miracles/signs, the plural form
occasionally conveys both meanings simultaneously. A single verse of the
Quran is not deemed to be miracle since some short verses of the Quran (for
instance: 55:3; 69:1; 74:4; 75:8; 80:28; 81:26) are not unique and can be
found in daily conversation of Arabic-speaking people. In fact, the Quran
determines the minimum unit of miraculous nature as a chapter (10:38), and
the shortest chapters consist of 3 verses (103; 108; 110). Therefore, only
the plural form of "ayah", that is "ayaat",
can be used as reference to the verses/revelation of the Quran. However the
singular form, AYAH, in all its 84 occurrences in the Quran is always used to
mean sign or miracle. Therefore, I choose to translate the singular form
"ayah" in verse 2:106 as "sign."
In my articles and books, I have discussed these and many other unorthodox
theses in detail. Inshallah, this and many other
verses will be discussed in the margins of our English translation of the
Quran. (I will inshallah inform you in detail when
we start the project). Now, let's turn to my most recent inquiry.
Is Hell Eternal?
God, as demonstration of ultimate creation, chose to test the results of
creating a being with the ability to freely choose its own destiny (18:29; 6:110; 13:11).
God downloaded His revelation/commands/logic (rooh)
to the prototype human that would provide him with innate rules of reasoning
to distinguish falsehood from truth, bad from good (15:29; 32:9; 38:72;).
Messengers and books containing Rooh were only a
bonus mercy, mere reminders of the facts that could be discovered by reason (2:37-38; 10:57;
11:17; 16:89; 21:107; 29:51; 16:2;
36:69; 37:87; 39:21; 42:52; 58:22). Though believing that we humans have
freedom of will is one of the paradoxes most difficult to digest, I accept it
on faith (18:29; 57:22). God,
created life and death on this planet to test His ultimate creature (67:2).
After certain age, an individual is deemed accountable by God (46:15). God
decided to punish those who freely choose a path contradictory to its
original program since they corrupt it through false ideas and actions (2:57; 4:107; 6:12,20,26; 7:9,53177; 59:19). The programs that are
infected with viruses will experience a regretful stage called Hell (Hell and
Paradise are allegories: 13:35; 17:60; 37:62-64; 7:44-50). In this stage the
corrupt programs and their chief infector (Satan) will be penalized (7:11-27; 38:71-88), and then altogether they
will be annihilated. The only virus that will not be healed in the day of
Judgment is the virus that creates a schizophrenic personality, a personality
that submits itself to others besides God, a personality that do not free
itself from false gods thereby alienating itself from its origin, that is God
(4:48,116).
The popular belief that Hell will burn eternally bothered me for decades,
but I suppressed my problem by saying "God is Merciful and Just; He
knows something that I do not know." Of course, God knows numerous things that we do not
know. But, what if we are protecting our superstitions and false beliefs
through such an excuse? What if we are stopping ourselves from using God's
greatest gift: reason, which distinguishes a believer from a disbeliever, a
human from an animal? (2:73, 170, 171, 242, 269; 3:118, 190; 7:169; 8:22;
10:42, 100; 11:51; 12:2, 111; 13:4, 19; 16:67; 21:10, 67; 23:80; 24:61;
29:63; 30:28; 38:29; 39:9, 18, 21; 40:54; 59:14). Sure, there was a danger in
confusing "reason" with my personal wishes, ignorance and cultural
biases. I could distort the meaning of God's Word to appease my wishes or
conform to my limited knowledge. There was a fine line. Should I use my
reason to question an understanding that I inherited from a particular sect,
or should I follow everything I am thought without using my mind? Knowing
that the Quran strongly admonishes us from following the crowd, the footsteps
of our parents, or religious scholars blindly, (6:116; 2:170; 9:31; etc.). I rejected blind faith and
chose faith based on knowledge and reason. To prefer an unorthodox
understanding, I have adopted a two-pronged rule: I should be able to support
it by the original language of the scripture AND the unorthodox understanding
should not create contradiction either among the divine laws and precepts in
the scripture or between scripture and divine laws in nature.
About five years ago, I read a Turkish translation of a booklet, The
Universal Salvation, written by Musa Jarullah,Bigiyev (1874-1949). In
that booklet, Bigiyev argued that according to the
Quran and Hadith, Hell was not eternal. When I finished the booklet my
excitement and hope faded; the author had not dealt with many pertinent
verses that led hundreds of millions of Muslims to believe that hell was
eternal. He was making a radical assertion but he had little persuasive
argument to support it. He was utilizing more emotional appeal than scholarly
evaluation of related verses. Disappointed, I continued in my belief in
eternal Hell, albeit as a contradictory concept continuously irritating my
faith and intellect lurking in the background. I could not ignore numerous
Quranic verses/signs that were threatening disbelievers or mushriks with suffering in hell for eternity. But I also
could not ignore the other fact that God's most repeated attribute in the
Quran was God's mercy (RaHYM 114 times, RaHMaN 57 times, etc). God had decreed mercy as His
attribute (6:12,54)
and His mercy was immense (6:147; 40:7). I frequently enjoyed the implication
of the following dialogue between Jesus and God that will take place on the
day of judgment:
"'If you punish them, they are your creatures. If you
forgive them, you are almighty, wise.' God will say: 'This is a day when
their truth will benefit the truthful ones.' They have deserved gardens with
flowing streams. They abide there forever. God is pleased with them and they
are pleased with Him. This is the greatest achievement." (5:118-119)
His justice was also reminded frequently (3:182; 4:40; 8:51;
11:101; 16:33,118; 22:10; 41:46; 43:76;
50:29; 99:7-8). How can a merciful and just God torture his creatures in
eternal hell for their crimes committed in a very short time, a period that
is almost zero compared to eternity?! How could divine mercy and justice be
challenged by my limited mercy and justice? If I had a part of God's
revelation/knowledge/logic (rooh) in my genetic
program, then I should be able to find a way to embrace, not necessarily
comprehend, God's mercy and justice without reservation.
Mushriks And Ardent Disbelievers Are Condemned To Stay In
Hell Eternally!
Please note that the subtitle does not assert that "Mushriks and Ardent Disbelievers Are Condemned To Stay In
Eternal Hell!" And, according to the language used in the Quran there is
a difference. Let me explain:
All forms derived from the root of KHaLaDa (to
be eternal, live forever, to remain for ever in place, or to stay for long
time, or life time) occur 87 times in the Quran. If my preliminary count is
correct, in 40 occurrences it describes the duration of reward in Paradise
(2:25; 2:82; 3:15; 3:107; 3:136; 3:198; 4:13; 4:57; 4:122; 5:85; 5:119; 8:42;
9:22; 9:82; 9:89; 9:100; 10:26; 11; 23; 11:108; 14:23; 18:108; 20:86; 21:102;
23:11; 25:15; 25:16; 25:76; 29:58; 31:9; 39:73; 43:71; 46:14; 48:5; 50:34;
57:12; 58:22; 64:9; 65:11; 98:8; 50:34 ), and in 40 occurrences it describes
the duration of punishment in Hell-fire (2:39; 2:81; 2:162; 2:217; 2:257;
2:285; 3:88; 3:116; 4:14; 4:93; 4:169; 5:80; 6:128; 7:36; 9:17; 9:63; 9:68;
10:26; 10:27; 10:52; 11:107; 13:5; 16:29; 20:101; 21:99; 25:29; 25:69; 32:14;
33:65; 33:103; 39:72; 40:76; 41:28; 43:74; 47:15; 59:17; 64:10; 72:23; 85:17;
98:6).
The word KHaLaDa also conveys the meaning of
long duration. For instance, the classic Arabic dictionary Lisanul Arab lists the plural form KHawaLiD
to mean mountains and rocks since they last very long. The Quran, at least in
one instance, uses the past tense of the word to describe an act lasting
lifetime (7:176). The verse describes a fanatic disbeliever and tells us that
he "Akhlada ilal ardi." that is, stuck to the ground, stuck to lowly
ideas! In this article I do not argue that the meaning of the word KHaLaDa and all its derivatives convey only the idea of a
very long time or a period of a particular life time. Though there might be
some evidence for such an argument, and the lack of usage of this word for
God might be considered supportive evidence, presently I am not convinced.
As for the adverb ABaDa (eternally, ever,
forever), it occurs 28 times in the Quran, and out of these, in nine
occurrences it is used to describe the duration spent in paradise (4:57;
4:122; 5:119; 9:22; 9:100; 18:3; 64:9; 65:11; 98:8) and in three verses this
word is used for the duration spent in hell (4:169; 33:65; 82:23). Verses 5:37; 22:22;
32:20 state that the disbelievers will want to exit
Hell, but they will never be able to do so. The arguments of those who reject
eternal punishment is rejected (3:24).
ABaDa is used in 9:84; 9:108; 24:4; 33:53;
59:11; 62:7 to mean eternity contingent with the life of the subject:
·
"You shall
never (La.... ABaDa) pray for any of them when he
dies... " (9:84)
·
"You shall
never (La ... ABaDa) pray in such a masjid..." (9:108)
·
"... and
never (La ... ABaDa) accept t any testimony from
them..." (24:4)
·
"... You
shall never (La ... ABaDa) marry his wives after
him." (33:53)
·
"... We
will never (La ... ABaDa) obey anyone who against
you..." (59:11)
·
"... They
will never (La ... ABaDa) long for it... "
(62:7)
All these negative statements use ABaDa to
express a prohibition that will last forever. More accurately,
as long as conditions exist. For instance, when the person prohibited from
funeral prayer himself dies, the prohibition too ends naturally. A dead
person cannot pray at the grave of another dead person and therefore, this
prohibition does not practically last for eternity. Similarly, when the wives
of the Prophet all died, the prohibition to marry them ceased to exist.
Therefore, the eternity of prohibition was in fact limited by the condition
or life-time of the subject. In other words, in the above examples, the word ABaDa indicates the entirety of a particular period.
Eternal Punishment In Hell Does Not
Necessarily Mean That the Hell or its Inhabitants Are Eternal
Remember Jonah. When he escaped from his duty he was swallowed by a whale.
"But had he not been of those who glorify, he would have stayed in its belly to the day of
resurrection." (37: 143-144)
It is a fact that neither Jonah nor the whale was immortals that could
live to the day of resurrection. God knows this. Thus, this Quranic
expression simply informs us that Jonah would die or end up in the belly of
the whale. Although both would perish in a short time, whale would be the
ultimate destiny of Jonah until the day of resurrection. Had Jonah was not
going to be resurrected (together with the whale, 6:38), using the same logic, the verse would state:
"he would have stayed in its belly eternally."'
Similarly, verses informing us about disbelievers or idol worshipers
staying in Hell eternally does not necessarily mean that the Hell is eternal,
unless we are informed that Hell itself is eternal. It simply means that
disbelievers and idol worshipers would end up in Hell and nothing else. If
Hell together with its inhabitants one day ceased its existence, then the
disbelievers or idol worshipers would have stayed in Hell eternally. Their
punishment would be the entire life of Hell.
In fact, the Quran informs us that both the eternal punishment in Hell and
reward in Paradise is conditioned with their life
span:
"Eternally they abide therein (Hell), for as long as
the heavens and the earth endure, in accordance with the will of your Lord.
Your Lord is doer of whatever He wills. As for fortunate ones, they will be
in Paradise. Eternally they abide therein, for as long
as the heavens and the earth endure, in accordance with the will of your
Lord-an everlasting reward." (11:107)
The Quran informs us that the Earth and Heavens will be changed by
different Earth and Heavens (14:48).
If the re-creation referred in this verse is the one before the Day of
Judgment then there is possibility of another re-creation. There are
indications that Paradise will be preserved or created
again. For instance, the word KHuLD (eternal,
everlasting) is not used for Hell, but it is used as an adjective to describe
Paradise (25:15). On the other hand the same
adjective is not used to describe Hell, but to describe the punishment IN
HELL (10:52; 41:28).
Hell, Together With Its Inhabitants,
Will Be Annihilated
Our language contains synonyms, antonyms, compliments, counterparts, etc.
The Quran frequently uses pairs of words/concepts to contrast, compare, or
compliment each other. Usually, the frequencies of semantically related words
also demonstrate mathematical harmony, which is another subject I extensively
demonstrated in my books. For instance, Akhirah
(Hereafter) and Dunya (Lowly World) , Malak (Angel) and Shaytaan (Satan), Rahmah
(Mercy) and Huda (Guidance), Qul (Say) and Qalu (they said),
Khalq (Creation) and Helaak
(Annihilation), Hayat (Life) and Mawt (Death) are semantically and mathematically related
words.
Let's reflect on verse 40:11 and 67:2. The first verse refers to two
creations and two deaths and the second refers to creation of death and life.
These two verses can be understood better if we know that in the Quranic
language death cannot exist without life and vise versa. They exist together,
since Death is permanent halt of brain's conscious activity (39:42; 16:21) but a temporal stage to be followed
by resurrection (29:57; 10:56;
22:6). Death is a process leading to life. A living creature will die and a
dead creature will get a new life (22:66). Vegetation experiences successive
lives and deaths through seasons (2:64; 3:27;
6:95; 16:65; 22:5-6; 30:19-50; 35:9). After t he
first creation there was no death nor life; we just existed. But, God decided
to create death and life (67:2). Creation, death, life (current), death, life
(resurrection). In other words, two deaths and two lives (40:11). The word HaLaKa, on the other hand, is occasionally used to
describe death of an individual (40:34), but usually irreversible destruction
and annihilation, or total existential extinction of an entity (5:17; 6:6;
6:47; 8:42; 20:128; 21:95; 22:45; 28:59; 36:31; 69:5; 77:16).
". . . whereby those destined to be
perished/annihilated were perished/annihilated for an obvious reason, and
those destined to be saved/revived were saved/revived for an obvious reason
(or clear argument)" (8:42)
The above verse not only refers to the loss of lives and surviving in a
particular battle, but also to a higher cosmic event: disbelievers will
perish forever since they relied on falsehood; while believers will last
forever since they relied on a clear argument No wonder life and death is
used as metaphors for attaining truth or falsehood (6:122). In fact,
witnessing and acknowledging the truth leads to life, metaphorically and
literally:
"O you who believe, respond
to God and the messenger when he calls you to that which grants you
life. You should know that God in between a man and his heart, and that
before Him you will be gathered" (8:24).
From the above verse, it is fair to infer that those who reject the divine
message will lose eternal life. Will they die in Hell? The answer is No:
"Anyone who comes to His Lord guilty will deserve
Hell, wherein he never dies, nor stays alive." (20:74).
Then, the alternative is obvious: total annihilation, ontological
extinction together with Hell. Those programs with free choice that chose to
corrupt themselves with the worst diabolic viruses (such as associating
partners with God or killing an innocent program) will be sentenced to an
eternal punishment: after resurrection they will experience a period of
diagnosis, justice, regret and then with the creation of a new earth and
heaven, they will be hurled to non existence together with Hell. Perhaps,
their memories too will be erased from the minds of their relatives who chose
eternal life by dedicating their religion to God alone and by leading a
righteous life with the day of judgment in the mind.
God is Just and Merciful
The Quran repeatedly comfort us by reminding us God's perfect justice. The
following verse provides us with a precise idea of God's justice and mercy:
"For those who did good work there will be the best and more. .
. As for those who earned evil, they will receive equivalent evil (10:27).
Suffering in an eternal Hell creates a contradiction
between this divine justice, since eternity can not
be equal to an evil committed in during a limited life span of a human.
However, eternal punishment in life time of a non eternal Hell avoids such a
contradiction. After receiving an equivalent punishment the chief
evil-doers like those referred in verse 4:48,
will be eliminated from existence. They will end up in Hell and Hell will end
up in nothingness.
No wonder the first and the most repeated verse of the Quran reminds us
over and over that:
God is Gracious, Merciful (1:1).
* EDIP YUKSEL (YÜKSEL) is a Muslim reformer and former political
prisoner. Edip Yuksel has written more than twenty books on religion,
politics, philosophy and law in Turkish, many of them bestsellers in his
native land. He has also written numerous articles and essays in English. His
most recently published book is The Message, a best-selling Turkish
translation of the Quran that provides a fresh and radically different
approach to interpreting the holy book of Islam. His arguments against
sectarian dogmas and laws have helped spur a powerful reformation movement
that is gaining strength around the world, especially in Turkey.
Currently, dozens of Islamic organizations are promoting these very ideas and
ideals. Currently he is working on an English-language counterpart to his
controversial Turkish translation. Like that translation, this one challenges
Muslims to turn away from traditions and interpretations that reinforce the
powers of male clerical hierarchies, and to embrace the Quran directly. Edip
Yuksel is the founder of 19.org.
TOP
|