Verily, Al-Abrar (the pious who fear Allah and avoid evil) will
be in delight (Paradise). On thrones, looking (at all things). You will recognise in their
faces the brightness of delight. They will be given to drink pure sealed wine.
S. 83:22-25 Hilali-Khan
The readers should be asking themselves the following questions: What is Satan’s
work or creation doing in paradise and why would Allah allow Satan’s influence extend
even to his eternal abode?
Nadir Ahmed may attempt to explain away this gross discrepancy by appealing to the
following passage:
Save single-minded slaves of Allah; For them there is a known provision, Fruits. And
they will be honoured In the Gardens of delight, On couches facing one another; A cup from
a gushing spring is brought round for them, White, delicious to the
drinkers, Wherein there is no headache nor are they made mad thereby. And
with them are those of modest gaze, with lovely eyes, (Pure) as they were hidden eggs (of
the ostrich). S. 37:40-49 Pickthall
The heavenly wine, he may contend, which believers will drink will not cause headaches
or madness, thereby justifying Allah's decision to permit it in paradise.
The main problem with citing this passage is that the text itself nowhere identifies
this drink as wine. It does not even mention the words wine or strong drinks/intoxicants.
It simply says that believers will drink from a cup which contains a white colored drink
which does not cause headiness. If anything, one can make an argument that this drink is
actually milk. After all, the Quran does mention the fact that believers will be given
rivers of milk, and milk is indeed white:
A similitude of the Garden which those who keep their duty (to Allah) are promised:
Therein are rivers of water unpolluted, and rivers of milk whereof the flavour
changeth not, and rivers of wine delicious to the drinkers, and rivers of
clear-run honey; therein for them is every kind of fruit, with pardon from their Lord.
(Are those who enjoy all this) like those who are immortal in the Fire and are given
boiling water to drink so that it teareth their bowels? S. 47:15 Pickthall
One can even argue that the reason the passage emphasizes that this particular drink
doesn't cause headiness is to distinguish it from the wine which believers will have in
paradise. In other words, the qualification presupposes that this drink is different from
the wine which believers will be drinking since, unlike wine, this specific drink doesn't
cause madness or headaches. Putting it in another way, the passage is not identifying this
drink as wine, but is actually contrasting it to wine by highlighting the point that it
doesn't have the common affects associated with intoxicants.
4. Summarizing the Quran’s Contradictions
Let us briefly summarize the contradictions and problems raised by the Quran in regards
to intoxicants:
- Intoxicants are one of Allah’s goodly provisions for mankind.
- Muslims were permitted to drink intoxicants provided that it didn’t affect their
prayers.
- Intoxicants are said to be a great sin as well as being beneficial, with the sin
outweighing their benefit. This means that Allah allowed mankind in general, and Muslims
in particular, to drink a product that contains more sin than good.
- Intoxicants are actually the work of Satan, according to the Quran, and Muslims are
prohibited from drinking it. This means that either Allah is Satan, since one place says
that Allah gave mankind intoxicants whereas another text says it was Satan, or we have a
clear-cut contradiction.
- To make matters worse, the Quran says that in paradise Allah will give Muslims
Satan’s handiwork in great abundance, since they will drink from rivers of wine for
all eternity!
In light of the foregoing contradictions, it doesn’t come as a surprise that there
are some Muslims who deny that the Quran prohibits consumption of intoxicants altogether.
Based on some of the positive statements that the Quran makes regarding intoxicants,
certain Muslims have come to the conclusion that the Quran only forbids drunkenness and
abuse of intoxicants:
http://free-minds.org/articles/quranic/alcohol.htm
http://free-minds.org/articles/quranic/alcohol2.htm
If these Muslims are correct then the Quran does allow moderate consumption of
intoxicants, which Nadir claimed was hazardous to unborn children. Thus, the Quran has
contributed to the pain and suffering of "billions" of children since it has
failed to expressly prohibit the moderate consumption of alcohol!
In fact, there were many Muslim leaders who were notorious for their drinking:
- Yazid I (680-683): he was Muawiyah’s son. He drank daily and won the title Yazid
al-Khumur, the Yazid of wines.
- Abd al-Malik (685-705): he drank once a month but drank so heavily that he had to use
anti-vomiting medicine to pacify his drinking bouts.
- Al-Walid I (705-715): he drank every other day.
- Hisham ((724-743): He drank every Friday after the Muslim service. (Taken from Professor
Philip K. Hitti’s book, History of the Arabs from the Earliest Times to the
Present, new preface by Walid Khalidi [Palgrave Macmillan, paperback, revised tenth
edition 2002; ISBN: 0-333-63142-0], p. 227)
This has led some to conclude that consumption of intoxicants, even in small amounts,
was only forbidden by the proliferation of hadiths which condemned all alcoholic drinking,
reports that were only composed centuries after the death of Muhammad. If this is true
then this means that Muslims for centuries were jeopardizing the lives of children by
exposing them to fetal alcohol syndrome!
For more on the issue of whether the Quran forbids even moderate drinking we recommend
this article which
can also be accessed here.
5. The Real Reason for the Prohibition of Intoxicants according to Muslim Sources
Nadir didn’t bother to inform his audience the reason given by Muslim authorities
for the gradual prohibition of intoxicants. It is obvious why he didn’t bring this up
since, not only does it have nothing to do with Allah wanting to spare the lives of
infants, the explanations given by the scholars are quite embarrassing for Nadir.
When we consult the so-called authentic Islamic sources we come to realize that Allah
abrogated the permissibility of drinking intoxicants because Muslims were getting drunk
and making fools of themselves. We post here renowned Sunni exegete Ibn Kathir’s
lengthy commentary which shows this:
Causes of Its Revelation
Ibn Abi Hatim has recorded some reports about the incident of its revelation: Sa`d said,
"Four Ayat were revealed concerning me. A man from the Ansar once made some
food and invited some Muhajirin and Ansar men to it, and we ate and drank until we
became intoxicated. We then boasted about our status. Then a man held a camel's
bone AND INJURED SA’D’S NOSE, WHICH WAS SCARRED EVER SINCE. This occurred BEFORE
Al-Khamr was prohibited, and Allah later revealed…
(O you who believe! Approach not As-Salat (the prayer) when you are in a drunken
state). Muslim recorded this Hadith, and the collectors of the Sunan recorded
it, with the exception of Ibn Majah.
Another Reason
Ibn Abi Hatim narrated that `Ali bin Abi Talib said, "Abdur-Rahman bin `Awf
made some food to which he invited us and served some alcohol to drink. When we became
intoxicated, and the time for prayer came, they asked someone to lead us in prayer. He
recited `Say, "O disbelievers! I do not worship that which you worship, BUT WE
WORSHIP THAT WHICH YOU WORSHIP [refer to the correct wording of the Surah:
109]."’ Allah then revealed…
(O you who believe! Do not approach Salah when you are in a drunken state until you
know what you are saying)." This is the narration collected by Ibn Abi Hatim and
At-Tirmidhi, who said "Hasan [Gharib] Sahih." Allah's
statement…
(until you know what you are saying) is the best description for when one is
intoxicated, that is, when he does not know the meaning of what he is saying. When a
person is drunk, he makes obvious mistakes in the recitation and will not be able to be
humble during the prayer. Imam Ahmad recorded that Anas said that the Messenger of Allah
said…
(If one feels sleepy while he is praying, let him sleep for a while so that he knows
the meaning of what he is saying.) This was also recorded by Al-Bukhari and An-Nasa'i.
In some of the narrations of this Hadith, the Messenger said…
(…For he might want to ask for forgiveness, but instead curses himself!)…
(Source)
Hadiths that Prohibit Khamr (Intoxicants)
Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Hurayrah said, "There were three stages to prohibiting Khamr
(intoxicants). When the Messenger of Allah migrated to Al-Madinah, THE PEOPLE WERE
CONSUMING ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING, so they asked the Messenger of Allah about these
things, Allah revealed…
(They ask you about alcoholic drink and gambling. Say: "In them is a great sin,
and (some) benefit for men.")[2:219], until the end of the Ayah. The
people said, `They (intoxicants and gambling) WERE NOT PROHIBITED FOR US. Allah only
said…
(In them is a great sin, and (some) benefit for men.)' SO THEY WENT ON
DRINKING Khamr until one day, one of the emigrants lead his companions in the Maghrib
prayer and mixed up the Ayat in his recitation. Thereafter, Allah sent down
a tougher statement…
(O you who believe! Approach not the Salah (the prayer) when you are in a drunken
state until you know (the meaning of) what you utter.)[4:43] Then, THE PEOPLE WOULD
DRINK BEFORE THE TIME OF THE PRAYER so that they would attend the prayer while sober.
A firmer Ayah was later revealed…
(O you who believe! Khamr, Maysir, Ansab, and Azlam are an abomination of Shaytan's
handiwork. So avoid that in order that you may be successful.)[5:90-91] So they said,
`We abstained, O Lord!' Later, some people said, `O Allah's Messenger! Some people died
in the cause of Allah, while some others died in their beds, but they used to drink
alcohol and indulge in gambling, WHICH ALLAH HAS MADE A Rijs OF THE WORK OF Shaytan.'
So Allah sent down…
(Those who believe and do righteous good deeds, there is no sin on them for what
they ate…) [5:93], until the end of the Ayah. The Prophet said…
(Had they been made impermissible for them, they would have abandoned them as you
have abandoned them.) Ahmad recorded this Hadith. Imam Ahmad recorded that `Umar bin
Al-Khattab said, "O Allah! Explain the verdict about Khamr to us clearly." The Ayah
in Surat Al-Baqarah was revealed,
(They ask you about alcoholic drink and gambling. Say: "In them is a great
sin.")[2:219] `Umar was summoned and this Ayah was recited to him, but he
still said, "O Allah! Make the verdict of Khamr clear to us." Then the Ayah
in Surat An-Nisa' was revealed…
(O you who believe! Do not approach the Salah when you are in a drunken state.)
[4:43] Thereafter, the Prophet had someone herald when it was time to pray, "Those in
a drunken state are not to approach the prayer." `Umar was again summoned and the Ayah
was recited to him, but he still said, "O Allah! Make the verdict concerning Khamr
clear to us." Then, the Ayah in Surat Al-Ma'idah [5:91] was revealed,
and `Umar was summoned and it was recited to him. When he reached the part of the Ayah
that reads…
(So, will you not then abstain) [5:91], `Umar said, "We abstained, we
abstained."… (Source)
Another Hadith
Imam Ahmad recorded that Anas said, "I once was giving an alcoholic beverage to
Abu `Ubaydah bin Al-Jarrah, `Ubayy bin Ka`b, Suhayl bin Bayda' and several of their
friends meeting at Abu Talhah's house. When they were almost intoxicated, some Muslims
came and said, `Did you not know that Khamr has been prohibited.' They said, `We'll
wait and ask.' They then said, `O Anas! Spill the remaining alcohol out of your
container.' By Allah! They never drank it again, and their Khamr at that time was
made from unripe and normal dates.’" This is also recorded in the Two Sahihs. In
another narration by Anas, "I was the butler of the people in the house of Abu Talhah
when Khamr was prohibited, and in those days alcohol was made from unripe and
normal dates. A caller then heralded, and Abu Talhah ordered me to see what it was about.
So I found that a person was announcing that alcoholic drinks had been prohibited. Abu
Talhah ordered me to go out and spill the wine. I went out and spilled it, and it flowed
in the streets of Al-Madinah. Some people said, `Some people were killed and wine was
still in their stomachs.' Later on, Allah's revelation came…
(Those who believe and do righteous good deeds, there is no sin on them for what
they ate…) [5:93]." Ibn Jarir recorded that Anas bin Malik said, "I was
serving Abu Talhah, Abu `Ubaydah bin Al-Jarrah, Abu Dujanah, Mu`adh bin Jabal and Suhayl
bin Bayda', until they became intoxicated from an alcoholic drink made of mixed unripe
and normal dates. Then I heard someone herald, `Khamr has been made illegal.'
So no one went in or out until we spilled the alcohol and broke its barrels. Some of us
then performed ablution and others took a shower, and we wore some perfume. We then went
out to the Masjid while the Messenger of Allah was reciting…
(O you who believe! Khamr, Maysir, Ansab, and Azlam are only an abomination of
Shaytan's handiwork. So avoid that...) [5:90], until…
(So, will you not then abstain) [5:91]. A man asked, `O Allah's Messenger! What
about those who died drinking it.' Allah sent down the verse…
(Those who believe and do righteous good deeds, there is no sin on them for what
they ate.) [5:93]." (Source)
Another Hadith
Al-Hafiz Abu Bakr Al-Bayhaqi recorded that Sa`d said, "There were four Ayat
revealed about Khamr..." He then said, "A man from Al-Ansar made some
food and invited us. We drank Khamr before it was prohibited and became
intoxicated, AND THUS STARTED TO BOAST ABOUT OUR STATUS. The Ansar said that they were
better, while Quraysh (the Muhajirin) said that they were better. So a man from
the Ansar took a bone AND STRUCK SA’D’S NOSE WITH IT and made a flesh wound on
it. Ever since that happened, SA’D’S NOSE HAD A SCAR FROM THAT WOUND. The Ayah…
(Intoxicants, gambling,) until…
(So, will you not then abstain) was later revealed." Muslim recorded this
Hadith. (Source)
Another Hadith
Ash-Shafi`i narrated that Malik narrated that Nafi` said that Ibn `Umar said that the
Messenger of Allah said…
(Whoever drinks Khamr in the life of this world and does not repent from it, will be
deprived of it in the Hereafter.) Al-Bukhari and Muslim recorded this Hadith. Muslim
recorded that Ibn `Umar said that the Messenger of Allah said…
(Every intoxicant is Khamr, and every intoxicant is unlawful. Whoever drinks Khamr
and dies while addicted to it, without repenting from drinking it, will not drink it in
the Hereafter.) `Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Harith bin Hisham said that he heard `Uthman bin
`Affan saying, "Avoid Khamr, FOR IT IS THE MOTHER OF ALL SINS [Note- And yet
Allah allowed Muslims to consume the mother of all sins for many years before prohibiting
it!]. There was a man before your time who used to worship Allah secluded from the people.
Later, an evil woman loved him and sent her female servant to him saying that they wanted
him to witness something. So he went with the servant. Whenever they went through the
door, she locked it behind them, until he reached a beautiful woman with a young servant
boy and some alcohol. She said to him, `By Allah! I did not invite you to be a witness for
anything, but called you to have sex with me, kill this boy or drink this alcohol.' So she
gave him some alcohol, and he kept asking for more until he [became intoxicated and] had
sex with her and killed the boy. Therefore, avoid Khamr, because it is never
combined with faith, but one of them is bound to expel the other (from the heart)."
This was recorded by Al-Bayhaqi. This statement has an authentic chain of narration. Abu
Bakr bin Abi Ad-Dunya recorded this statement in his book on the prohibition of
intoxicants, but he related it from the Prophet. Relating it from `Uthman is more
authentic, and Allah knows best. Ahmad bin Hanbal recorded that Ibn `Abbas said,
"When Khamr was prohibited, some people said, `O Allah's Messenger! What about
our brethren who died while still drinking Khamr' Allah sent down the Ayah…
(Those who believe and do righteous good deeds, there is no sin on them for what
they ate,) until the end of the Ayah… (Source)
See the following for more details.
It even got so bad that Muhammad’s uncle and foster-brother Hamza killed his
nephew Ali’s camels and ridiculed Muhammad himself!
Narrated Ali:
I got a she-camel in my share of the war booty on the day (of the battle) of Badr, and
the Prophet had given me a she-camel from the Khumus. When I intended to marry Fatima, the
daughter of Allah's Apostle, I had an appointment with a goldsmith from the tribe of Bani
Qainuqa' to go with me to bring Idhkhir (i.e. grass of pleasant smell) and sell it to the
goldsmiths and spend its price on my wedding party. I was collecting for my she-camels
equipment of saddles, sacks and ropes while my two she-camels were kneeling down beside
the room of an Ansari man. I returned after collecting whatever I collected, to see the
humps of my two she-camels cut off and their flanks cut open and some portion of their
livers was taken out. When I saw that state of my two she-camels, I could not help
weeping. I asked, "Who has done this?" The people replied, "Hamza bin
Abdul Muttalib who is staying with some ANSARI DRUNKS in this house." I went
away till I reached the Prophet and Zaid bin Haritha was with him. The Prophet noticed on
my face the effect of what I had suffered, so the Prophet asked, "What is wrong with
you?" I replied, "O Allah's Apostle! I have never seen such a day as today.
Hamza attacked my two she-camels, cut off their humps, and ripped open their flanks, and
he is sitting there in a house in the company of SOME DRUNKS." The Prophet
then asked for his covering sheet, put it on, and set out walking followed by me and Zaid
bin Haritha till he came to the house where Hamza was. He asked permission to enter, and
they allowed him, and they were drunk. Allah's Apostle started rebuking
Hamza for what he had done, but Hamza was drunk and his eyes were red. Hamza
looked at Allah's Apostle and then he raised his eyes, looking at his knees, then he
raised up his eyes looking at his umbilicus, and again he raised up his eyes looking at
his face. Hamza then said, "Aren't you but the slaves of my father?" Allah's
Apostle realized that he was drunk, so Allah's Apostle retreated, and we went out
with him. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 53,
Number 324)
The foregoing amply proves that the last thing Allah had in mind when he prohibited
alcohol was the lives of infants. Allah was really concerned with how Muslims were getting
drunk and disgracing themselves by misquoting the Quran in their prayers and saying stupid
things that resulted in Muslims physically harming one another!
6. Abrogation or Contradiction?
The view that Allah allowed Muslims to drink intoxicants at the beginning and then
prohibited it means that Allah abrogated his previous instructions regarding this issue.
Yet this introduces the additional problem of Allah changing his mind as well as
contradicting himself. After all, the doctrine of abrogation is simply another way of
saying that the Quran contains major discrepancies as the following Muslim admits:
… The principle laid down in this passage - relating to the supersession of the
Biblical dispensation by that of the Qur’an - has given rise to an erroneous
interpretation by many Muslim theologians. The word ayah ('message') occurring
in this context is also used to denote a ‘verse’ of the Qur’an (because
every one of these verses contains a message). Taking this restricted meaning of the term ayah,
some scholars conclude from the above passage that certain verses of the Qur’an have
been ‘abrogated’ by God’s command before the revelation of the Qur’an
was completed. Apart from the fancifulness of this assertion - WHICH CALLS TO MIND THE
IMAGE OF A HUMAN AUTHOR CORRECTING, ON SECOND THOUGHT, THE PROOFS OF HIS MANUSCRIPT,
deleting one passage and replacing it with another - there does not exist a single
reliable Tradition to the effect that the Prophet ever declared a verse of the Qur’an
to have been ‘abrogated’. At the root of the so-called ‘doctrine of
abrogation’ MAY LIE THE INABILITY OF SOME EARLY COMMENTATORS TO RECONCILE ONE
QUR'ANIC PASSAGE WITH ANOTHER; a difficulty which was overcome by declaring that one of
the verses in question had been ‘abrogated’. This arbitrary procedure explains
also why there is no unanimity whatsoever among the upholders of the ‘doctrine of
abrogation’ as to which, and how many, Qur’an-verses have been affected by it;
and furthermore, as to whether this alleged abrogation implies a total elimination of the
verse from the context of the Qur’an, or only a cancellation of the specific
ordinance or statement contained in it. In short, the ‘doctrine of abrogation’
has no basis in historical fact, and must be rejected… (Asad, Message of the
Qur’an [Dar Al-Andalus Limited 3 Library Ramp, Gibraltar rpt. 1993], pp. 22-23,
n. 87; source;
bold and capital emphasis ours)
Another Muslim, one who was from the Ahmadiyya sect, stated that:
The principle on which the theory of abrogation is based is unacceptable, being
contrary to the clear teachings of the Qur'an. A verse is considered to be
abrogated when the two cannot be reconciled with each other; in other words, when
they appear to contradict each other. But the Qur’an destroys this foundation
when it declares that no part of it is at variance with another: "Will they not then
meditate on the Qur’an? And if it were from any other than Allah, they would have
found in it many a discrepancy" (4 : 82). It was due to lack of meditation that one
verse was thought to be at variance with another; and hence it is that in almost all cases
where abrogation has been upheld by one person, there has been another who, being able to
reconcile the two, has repudiated the alleged abrogation. (Ali, The Religion of Islam
[The Ahmadiyya Anjuman Isha'at Islam (Lahore) U.S.A., Eighth Edition 2005], p. 32; bold
and italic emphasis ours)
Since the Quran admits that if God didn’t author it then it would contain many
contradictions:
Do they not then consider the Qur'an carefully? Had it been from other than
Allah, they would surely have found therein much contradictions. S. 4:82 Hilali-Khan
And since it contains contradictory statements regarding the nature and permissibility
of intoxicants this means that the Quran cannot be from an all-knowing God.
For more on the issue of abrogation please consult the following link:
http://answering-islam.org/Quran/index.html#abrogation
7. What about the former Prophets?
The other problem with the Quran’s stance regarding the slow and gradual
prohibition of intoxicants is that this presupposes that for centuries Allah permitted
countless of people to consume wine and other such drinks. The Quran’s statements
basically imply that Allah allowed the prophets and their communities to drink intoxicants
since Allah only prohibited this at Muhammad’s time. This means that Allah
jeopardized the lives of countless of infants since women were allowed to drink wine and
other intoxicants even during their pregnancy, which could have resulted in babies being
born with fetal alcohol syndrome!
Even Nadir is aware of this since he criticized the Holy Bible for not preventing
believers from drinking alcohol, yet failed to see how this actually undercuts his own
position as a Muslim. Since Nadir had a problem with the Holy Bible allowing believers to
drink, provided that they do not get drunk:
"Let us behave decently, as in the daytime, not in orgies and drunkenness, not in
sexual immorality and debauchery, not in dissension and jealousy." Romans 13:13
"But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls
himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a
drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat." 1 Corinthians 5:11
"Do not get drunk on wine, which leads to debauchery. Instead, be filled with the
Spirit." Ephesians 5:18
We challenge him to show where exactly does the Quran say that Allah forbade the
prophets before Muhammad from drinking intoxicants? Where does it claim that the Muslims
were following the example of the previous generations of believers who had been prevented
from drinking wine and other such drinks?
It doesn’t say any such thing, but assumes that these communities were permitted
to consume intoxicants much like Muslims were allowed to do so in the beginning.
Thus, if Nadir were to be consistent and apply his reasoning to his own scripture then
he would be forced to conclude that his god didn’t care enough for all the
"billions and billions" of babies that were born prior to Islam. His god only
started caring for them after the advent of Islam since it was only during this time that
he prevented believers from consuming intoxicants!
8. Islam and the Dehumanization of Infants
Since Nadir believes that Allah’s prohibition of alcohol saved countless infant
lives then he should have no problem explaining certain Islamic teachings which have done
or can lead to serious damage and harm to the lives of young children.
For instance, a problem we have to day is with abortion, the unjust killing of unborn
infants. One way which those who are for abortion try to justify the murder of unborn
infants is by using specific terminology which aims to dehumanize them, i.e. identifying
them as embryos and fetuses.
Such language can cause a person to view the unborn child not as a human being that is
starting to develop, but as nonliving matter. And what is so bad with killing something
that isn’t a living being?
Since Allah must have known that man would start aborting babies he would obviously
want to provide legislation which would prevent his followers from engaging in such a
practice since he cares so much for them. We would expect that Allah would use precise
language which would insure that those who fear him realize that unborn infants
aren’t merely developing matter, but human lives which Allah is fashioning in the
wombs of their mothers.
But this is not what we find. In fact, Allah uses terminology which provides support
for abortionist groups since he claims that at certain stages of development the baby goes
from being nothing more than a despicable fluid to a blood-clot!
Muhammad went further and taught that the spirit or soul of a developing baby, that
which makes it a living being, isn’t created or given until the 120th day
of pregnancy:
Narrated Abdullah:
Allah's Apostle, the true and truly inspired said, "(as regards your creation), every
one of you is collected in the womb of his mother for the first forty days, and then he
becomes a clot for an other forty days, and then a piece of flesh for an other forty days.
Then Allah sends an angel to write four words: He writes his deeds, time of his death,
means of his livelihood, and whether he will be wretched or blessed (in religion). Then
the soul is breathed into his body. So a man may do deeds characteristic of the people
of the (Hell) Fire, so much so that there is only the distance of a cubit between him and
it, and then what has been written (by the angel) surpasses, and so he starts doing deeds
characteristic of the people of Paradise and enters Paradise. Similarly, a person may do
deeds characteristic of the people of Paradise, so much so that there is only the distance
of a cubit between him and it, and then what has been written (by the angel) surpasses,
and he starts doing deeds of the people of the (Hell) Fire and enters the (Hell)
Fire." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55,
Number 549)
Narrated 'Abdullah:
Allah's Apostle, the truthful and truly-inspired, said, "Each one of you collected in
the womb of his mother for forty days, and then turns into a clot for an equal period (of
forty days) and turns into a piece of flesh for a similar period (of forty days) and then
Allah sends an angel and orders him to write four things, i.e., his provision, his age,
and whether he will be of the wretched or the blessed (in the Hereafter). THEN the soul
is breathed into him. And by Allah, a person among you (or a man) may do deeds of the
people of the Fire till there is only a cubit or an arm-breadth distance between him and
the Fire, but then that writing (which Allah has ordered the angel to write) precedes, and
he does the deeds of the people of Paradise and enters it; and a man may do the deeds of
the people of Paradise till there is only a cubit or two between him and Paradise, and
then that writing precedes and he does the deeds of the people of the Fire and enters
it." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 77,
Number 593)
Dr. William Campbell comments on the impact that the foregoing statements, specifically
the claim that the fetus becomes a clot, have made upon Muslims:
In the dictionaries of Wehr and Abdel-Nour the only meanings given for ‘alaqa in
this feminine singular form are "clot" and "leech", and in North
Africa both of these meanings are still used. Many patients have come to me to have a
leech removed from their throats, and many women, believing that the fetus goes through a
stage as a clot, have come to me in the dispensary asking for medicine because their
periods haven't come. When I would answer that I couldn't do that because I believed that
the fetus was a person, they would say, "but it's still blood." (Campbell, The
Qur’an and the Bible in light of History and Science, Section Four, Science and
Revelation; source)
In other words, Islam teaches that the fetus is nothing more than nonliving flesh for
the first 120 days, providing support and ammunition for abortionists and pro-choice
groups in their pursuit of finding justification to murder unborn babies!
The Holy Bible, unlike the Islamic literature, clearly says that life begins at the
moment of conception:
"Your hands fashioned and made me, and now you have destroyed me altogether.
Remember that you have made me like clay; and will you return me to the dust? Did you
not pour me out like milk and curdle me like cheese? You clothed me with skin and
flesh, and knit me together with bones and sinews. You have granted me life and
steadfast love, and your care has preserved my spirit." Job 10:8-12
"For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.
I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are your works; my
soul knows it very well. My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in
secret, intricately woven in the depths of the earth. Your eyes saw my unformed
substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me,
when as yet there were none of them." Psalm 139:13-16
The Bible further teaches that the soul is an essential part of what makes a person a
living entity:
"Then the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his
nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." Genesis 2:7
In fact, death occurs precisely because the soul departs from a person:
"And they journeyed from Beth-el; and there was still some way to come to Ephrath;
and Rachel travailed, and she had hard labour. And it came to pass, when she was in hard
labour, that the mid-wife said unto her: 'Fear not; for this also is a son for thee.' And
it came to pass, as her soul was in departing--for she died--that she called
his name Ben-oni; but his father called him Benjamin. And Rachel died, and was buried in
the way to Ephrath--the same is Beth-lehem." Genesis 35:16-19
"For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so
that man hath no pre-eminence above a beast; for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all
are of the dust, and all return to dust. Who knoweth the spirit of man whether
it goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast whether it goeth downward to the earth?"
Ecclesiastes 3:19-21
"For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so also faith apart
from works is dead." James 2:26
These passages lead us to make the inference that a child’s soul or spirit is
created at the very moment of conception, since the child is said to be alive precisely
when s/he is conceived.
There
is additional evidence substantiating this:
"And there appeared to him an angel of the Lord standing on the right side of the
altar of incense. And Zechariah was troubled when he saw him, and fear fell upon him. But
the angel said to him, ‘Do not be afraid, Zechariah, for your prayer has been heard,
and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you shall call his name John. And you
will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth, for he will be great
before the Lord. And he must not drink wine or strong drink, and he will be filled
with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother's womb. And he will turn many of the
children of Israel to the Lord their God, and he will go before him in the spirit and
power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to
the wisdom of the just, to make ready for the Lord a people prepared.’" Luke 1:11-17
John was filled with the Holy Spirit at conception!
"In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named
Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. And
the virgin's name was Mary. And he came to her and said, ‘Greetings, O favored one,
the Lord is with you!’ But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and tried to
discern what sort of greeting this might be. And the angel said to her, ‘Do not be
afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your
womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be
called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his
father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there
will be no end.’ And Mary said to the angel, ‘How will this be, since I am a
virgin?’ And the angel answered her, ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and
the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be
called holy--the Son of God. And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also
conceived a son, and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. For nothing
will be impossible with God.’ And Mary said, ‘Behold, I am the servant of the
Lord; let it be to me according to your word.’ And the angel departed from her."
Luke 1:26- 38
Mary conceived Jesus when Elizabeth was already six months pregnant with John the
Baptist. During that time, the Bible says that Mary went to visit Elizabeth, and when she
arrived, something amazing happened:
"In those days Mary arose and went with haste into the hill country, to a town in
Judah, and she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth. And when Elizabeth
heard the greeting of Mary, the baby leaped in her womb. And Elizabeth was
filled with the Holy Spirit, and she exclaimed with a loud cry, ‘Blessed are you
among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb! And why is this granted to me that
the mother of my Lord should come to me? For behold, when the sound of your greeting
came to my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy. And blessed is she who
believed that there would be a fulfillment of what was spoken to her from the
Lord.’" Luke 1:39-45
Here, John leaps before Mary while still in his mother’s womb in honor of Christ.
This proves that, according to the Holy Bible, a child is a real human being right at the
moment of conception since Mary had just conceived Christ when John leapt before her.
Since Islam dehumanizes a baby, claiming it has no soul until its 120th day
of conception, and that it goes from being fluid to a clot of blood, this means that,
according to Nadir Ahmed’s logic, Allah and his messenger have helped contribute to
the death of "billions and billions" of aborted babies.
9. What about Prepubescent Girls?
Another damaging practice to children is marriages with minors. Modern medical
information has shown that such marriages cause serious physical and psychological damage
to young girls. Christian polemicist Silas presents the following scientific information:
"An appraisal of harmful traditional practices and their effects on women and the
girl child.
Traditional cultural
practices reflect values and beliefs held by members of a community for periods often
spanning generations. Every social grouping in the world has specific traditional cultural
practices and beliefs, some of which are beneficial to all members, while others are
harmful to a specific group, such as women. These harmful traditional practices include
female genital mutilation (FGM); forced feeding of women; early marriage; the various
taboos or practices which prevent women from controlling their own fertility; nutritional
taboos and traditional birth practices; son preference and its implications for the status
of the girl child; female infanticide; early pregnancy; and dowry price. Despite their
harmful nature and their violation of international human rights laws, such practices
persist because they are not questioned and take on an aura of morality in the eyes of
those practicing them....
(NOTE: most of these are practiced by the Islamic world).
...Child marriage robs a girl of her childhood-time necessary to develop physically,
emotionally and psychologically. In fact, early marriage inflicts great emotional stress
as the young woman is removed from her parents' home to that of her husband and in-laws.
Her husband, who will invariably be many years her senior, will have little in common with
a young teenager. It is with this strange man that she has to develop an intimate
emotional and physical relationship. She is obliged to have intercourse, although
physically she might not be fully developed....
...Health complications that result from early marriage in the Middle East and North
Africa, for example, include the risk of operative delivery, low weight and malnutrition
resulting from frequent pregnancies and lactation in the period of life when the young
mothers are themselves still growing....
The work of the
Committee has also permitted the identification of certain areas where law reform should
be undertaken, in both civil and penal areas, such as the minimum age for marriage and
establishment of the age of criminal responsibility as being the attainment of puberty.
Some States have argued that girls attain their physical maturity earlier, but it is the
view of the Committee that maturity cannot simply be identified with physical development
when social and mental development are lacking and that, on the basis of such criteria,
girls are considered adults before the law upon marriage, thus being deprived of the
comprehensive protection ensured by the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The
International Conference on Population and Development, held at Cairo in September 1994
(see p. 36 below), encouraged Governments to raise the minimum age for marriage. In her
preliminary report to the Commission on Human Rights, the Special Rapporteur on violence
against women, its causes and consequences, Ms. Radhika Coomaraswamy, also recognized that
the age of marriage was a factor contributing to the violation of women's rights ...
Early pregnancy can
have harmful consequences for both young mothers and their babies. According to UNICEF, no
girl should become pregnant before the age of 18 because she is not yet physically ready
to bear children. Babies of mothers younger than 18 tend to be born premature and
have low body weight; such babies are more likely to die in the first year of life.
The risk to the young mother's own health is also greater. Poor health is common among
indigent pregnant and lactating women. ...
An additional health
risk to young mothers is obstructed labor, which occurs when the baby's head is too big
for the orifice of the mother. This provokes vesicovaginal fistulas, especially when an
untrained traditional birth attendant forces the baby's head out unduly....
Generally throughout
the developing world, the average food intake of pregnant and lactating mothers is far
below that of the average male. Cultural practices, including nutritional taboos, ensure
that pregnant women are deprived of essential nutriments, and as a result they tend to
suffer from iron and protein deficiencies...."
And:
In the book "One River", by Wade Davis, page 228, (Simon & Schuster),
Davis documents how when young girls are subjected to intercourse with an adult male,
their hips get damaged, because their bones are not fully formed:
"These were
Loayza's concubines, Indian children who grew into adolescence physically deformed, their
hips weak and permanently dislocated from intercourse." (Muhammad, Aisha, Islam,
and Child Brides; source)
Again, seeing that Nadir believes that Allah is so loving and kind to children since he
prohibited alcoholism, thereby lessening the number of infant syndrome cases, we would
expect that Allah would condemn such marriages.
But sadly for Nadir, Allah actually permits Muslims to marry prepubescent girls,
thereby contributing to the destruction of young lives:
And if you are in doubt as to the prescribed period for such of your women as have
despaired of monthly courses, then know that the prescribed period for them is three
months, and also for such as do not have their monthly courses yet. And as for
those who are with child, their period shall be until they are delivered of their burden.
And whoso fears ALLAH, HE will provide facilities for him in his affair. S. 65:4 Sher Ali
Here is what Ibn Kathir wrote regarding this text:
<divorce them at their `Iddah>, "The `Iddah is made up of cleanliness
and the menstrual period." So he divorces her while it is clear that she is pregnant,
or he does not due to having sex, or since he does not know if she is pregnant or not.
This is why the scholars said that there are two types of divorce, one that conforms to
the Sunnah and another innovated. The divorce that conforms to the Sunnah is one where the
husband pronounces one divorce to his wife when she is not having her menses and without
having had sexual intercourse with her after the menses ended. One could divorce his wife
when it is clear that she is pregnant. As for the innovated divorce, it occurs when one
divorces his wife when she is having her menses, or after the menses ends, has sexual
intercourse with her and then divorces her, even though he does not know if she became
pregnant or not. There is a third type of divorce, which is neither a Sunnah nor an
innovation where one divorces A YOUNG WIFE WHO HAS NOT BEGUN TO HAVE MENSES, the
wife who is beyond the age of having menses, and divorcing one's wife before the marriage
was consummated. (Tafsir Ibn Kathir; source;
bold and capital emphasis ours)
And:
The `Iddah of Those in Menopause and Those Who do not have Menses
Allah the Exalted clarifies the waiting period of the woman in menopause. And that
is the one whose menstruation has stopped due to her older age. Her `Iddah is three months
instead of the three monthly cycles for those who menstruate, which is based upon the Ayah
in (Surat) Al-Baqarah. [see 2:228] The same for THE YOUNG, WHO HAVE NOT REACHED THE YEARS
OF MENSTRUATION…
<Those in menopause among your women, for them the `Iddah, if you have doubt, is
three months; and for those who have no courses. And for those who are pregnant, their
`Iddah is until they lay down their burden.> Ibn Abi Hatim recorded a simpler
narration than this one from Ubay bin Ka`b who said, "O Allah's Messenger! When the
Ayah in Surat Al-Baqarah was revealed prescribing the `Iddah of divorce, some people in
Al-Madinah said, `There are still some women whose `Iddah has not been mentioned in the
Qur'an. There are THE YOUNG, the old whose menstruation is discontinued, and the
pregnant.' Later on, this Ayah was revealed… (Tafsir Ibn Kathir;
source; capital emphasis ours)
Muhammad himself married a nine-year old who hadn’t attained maturity:
Narrated 'Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage
when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till
his death). (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62,
Number 64;
see also Numbers 65 and 88)
Since Allah was kind enough to spare the lives of developing babies through his
prohibition of alcohol why didn’t he abolish the practice of child marriages? Surely,
if Allah knew that alcohol would harm infants he must have known that marriages with
immature girls cause serious health risks, as well as severe psychological trauma.
If Nadir appeals to cultural practices to justify this perversion he is only digging
himself in a bigger hole since this is a weak defense for a couple of reasons. First,
Muhammad had no problem with setting aside many prevalent cultural practices such as the
adoption of children, the impermissibility of marrying the former wives of these adopted
children, burying infant girls alive etc. In light of this he should have also done away
with this abominable practice, especially when he was to set the example for Muslims for
all times. Instead, he has enshrined marriages to immature girls by his example and
teachings, thereby causing "billions and billions" of young girls to suffer
irreparable physical and emotional damage.
Second, Nadir tried to use modern scientific data to prove that the Quran is of divine
origin, that the author of the Quran was aware of certain scientific facts which were only
recently discovered. Surely, this same author would have known that science would
eventually discover that child marriages are quite harmful to young girls and would want
to therefore prohibit it altogether.
How convenient that Nadir chose to focus on the effects that the prohibition of
alcoholism has on saving "billions" of infants, but failed to mention the other
teachings of his prophet regarding such matters as child marriages and the status of the
unborn baby which has done countless damage all over the world.
In his concluding comments, Nadir asked whether Satan would inspire a book which saved
"billions" of infant lives, with the assumption being that the audience could
see how absurd such a claim truly is. After all, Satan seeks to destroy human lives not
save them.
Apart from the utter circularity of his argument, i.e. assuming that the Quran must be
divine since the forbidding of intoxicants saved the lives of infants which assumes that
this is the reason why Allah prohibited it, such reasoning can be turned against him to
prove that Islam cannot be a divinely revealed religion.
- For instance, would God sanction child marriages thereby causing countless of young
girls physiological and psychology damage?
- Would God inspire statements which could be used to prove that at certain stages of
their development unborn infants are not human, providing justification for their murder?
- Would God author a book containing contradictory statements regarding the nature and
permissibility of intoxicants, i.e. whether it is God’s provisions or Satan’s
handiwork, whether Muslims can drink it or refrain from it altogether?
Doesn’t the foregoing actually prove that Satan did in fact have a hand in
composing the Quran? After all, didn’t Muhammad at one time believe that the spirit
who appeared to him was Satan or a demon that had come to possess him?
Further Reading
http://answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/qi028.html
http://answering-islam.org/Shamoun/wine_consumption.htm
http://answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/incomplete.html
http://www.studytoanswer.net/islam/badwine.html
http://answering-islam.org/Authors/Arlandson/drinking.htm
http://answering-islam.org/Shamoun/prepubescent.htm
http://answering-islam.org/Shamoun/prepubescent2.htm
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/kasem/wine_drinking.htm
Responses to Nadir Ahmed
Articles by Sam Shamoun
Answering Islam Home Page