返回总目录
An Introduction To The Science Of Hadith: The Classification Of Hadith According To The Reliability And Memory Of Reporters


An Introduction
To The Science Of Hadith
The Classification
Of Hadith: According To The Reliability And Memory Of Reporters
© Islamic
Awareness, All Rights Reserved.
The final verdict on a hadith, i.e. Sahih (sound), Hasan (good), Da`if
(weak) or Maudu`
(fabricated, forged), depends critically on this factor.
Among the early traditionists, mostly of the first
two centuries, ahadith were classified into two categories only: Sahih and Da`if;
al-Tirmidhi was to be the first to distinguish Hasan from Da`if.
This is why traditionists and jurists such as Ahmad, who seemed to argue
on the basis of Da`if ahadith sometimes, were in fact basing their argument
on the ahadith which were later to be known as Hasan.65
We now examine in more detail these four important
classes of ahadith.
Sahih
Al-Shafi`i states the following requirement in
order for a hadith which is not Mutawatir to be acceptable:
"Each reporter should be trustworthy in his
religion; he should be known to be truthful in his narrating, to understand
what he narrates, to know how a different expression can alter the meaning,
and report the wording of the hadith verbatim, not only its meaning.
This is because if he does not know how a different expression can change the
whole meaning, he will not know if he has changed what is lawful into what is
prohibited. Hence, if he reports the hadith according to its wording,
no change of meaning will be found at all. Moreover, he should be a good memoriser
if he happens to report from his memory, or a good preserver of his writings
if he happens to report from them. He should agree with the narrations of the
huffaz (leading authorities in hadith), if he reports something which
they do also. He should not be a Mudallis, who
narrates from someone he met something he did not hear, nor should he report
from the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) contrary to what
reliable sources have reported from him. In addition, the one who is above him
(in the isnad) should be of the same quality, [and so on,] until the hadith
goes back uninterrupted to the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace)
or any authority below him."66
Ibn al-Salah, however, defines a Sahih hadith more precisely by saying:
"A Sahih hadith is the one which has a continuous isnad,
made up of reporters of trustworthy memory from similar authorities, and which
is found to be free from any irregularities (i.e. in the text) or defects (i.e.
in the isnad)."
By the above definition, no room is left for any
weak hadith, whether, for example, it is Munqati`,
Mu`dal, Mudtarib, Maqlub, Shadhdh, Munkar, Ma`lul,
or contains a Mudallis. The definition also excludes Hasan
ahadith, as will be discussed under that heading.
Of all the collectors of hadith, al-Bukhari
and Muslim were greatly admired because of their tireless attempts to collect
Sahih ahadith only. It is generally understood that the
more trustworthy and of good memory the reporters, the more authentic the hadith.
The isnad: Al-Shafi`i
--- Malik --- Nafi` --- `Abdullah b. `Umar --- The Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him
peace), is called a "golden isnad" because of its renowned reporters.67
Some traditionists prefer Sahih al-Bukhari to Sahih Muslim because al-Bukhari always looked for those
reporters who had either accompanied or met each other, even if only once in
their lifetime. On the other hand, Muslim would accept a reporter who is simply
found to be contemporary to his immediate authority in reporting.68
The following grading is given for Sahih ahadith only:
- those which are transmitted by both al-Bukhari
and Muslim;
- those which are transmitted by al-Bukhari
only;
- those which are transmitted by Muslim only;
those which are not found in the above two
collections, but
- which agree with the requirements of both al-Bukhari
and Muslim;
- which agree with the requirements of al-Bukhari
only;
- which agree with the requirements of Muslim
only; and
- those declared Sahih by other traditionists.69
Hasan
Al-Tirmidhi means by hadith Hasan: a hadith which is not Shadhdh,
nor contains a disparaged reporter in its isnad, and which is reported through
more than one route of narration.70
Al-Khattabi (d. 388) states a very
concise definition, "It is the one where its source is known and its reporters
are unambiguous."
By this he means that the reporters of the hadith
should not be of a doubtful nature, such as with the Mursal or Munqati`
hadith, or one containing a Mudallis.
Ibn al-Salah classifies Hasan
into two categories:
- one with an isnad containing a reporter who
is mastur ("screened", i.e. no prominent person reported from him)
but is not totally careless in his reporting, provided that a similar text
is reported through another isnad as well;
- one with an isnad containing a reporter who
is known to be truthful and reliable, but is a degree less in his preservation/memory
of hadith in comparison to the reporters of Sahih ahadith.
In both categories, Ibn al-Salah requires
that the hadith be free of any shudhudh (irregularities).71
Al-Dhahabi, after giving the various definitions,
says, "A Hasan hadith is one which excels the Da`if but nevertheless does not reach the standard of a Sahih hadith."72 In the light
of this definition, the following isnads are Hasan according to al-Dhahabi:
- Bahz b. Hakam --- his father --- his grandfather;
- `Amr b. Shu`aib --- his father --- his grandfather;
- Muhammad b. `Amr --- Abu Salamah
--- Abu Hurairah.
Reporters such as al-Harith b. `Abdullah,
`Asim b. Damurah, Hajjaj b. Artat, Khusaif
b. `Abd al- Rahman and Darraj Abu al-Samh attract different
verdicts: some traditionists declare their ahadith Hasan,
others declare them Da`if.73
Examples of Hasan hadith
Malik, Abu Dawud, al-Tirmidhi and al-Hakim
reported through their isnads from `Amr
b. Shu`aib --- his father --- his grandfather, that the Messenger
of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) said,
"A single rider is a devil (i.e. disobedient),
two riders are two devils, but three makes a travelling party."
Al-Tirmidhi declares this hadith
to be Hasan because of the above isnad, which falls short of the
requirements for a Sahih hadith.74
Several weak ahadith may mutually support
each other to the level of Hasan.
According to the definitions of al-Tirmidhi and
Ibn al-Salah, a number of similar weak ahadith on a particular
issue can be raised to the degree of Hasan if the weakness found in their reporters is of a mild
nature. Such a hadith is known as Hasan
li ghairihi (Hasan
due to others), to distinguish it from the type previously-discussed, which
is Hasan li dhatihi (Hasan in itself). Similarly, several Hasan
ahadith on the same subject may make the hadith Sahih li
ghairihi, to be distinguished from the previously-discussed Sahih li
dhatihi.
However, in case the weakness is severe (e.g.,
the reporter is accused of lying or the hadith is itself Shadhdh),
such very weak ahadith will not support each other and will remain weak.
For example, the well-known hadith, "He who preserves forty ahadith
for my Ummah will be raised by Allah on the Day of Resurrection among the men
of understanding", has been declared to be Da`if
by most of the traditionists, although it is reported through several routes.75
Da`if
A hadith which fails to reach the status
of Hasan is Da`if.
Usually, the weakness is one of discontinuity in the isnad, in which case the
hadith could be Mursal, Mu`allaq,
Mudallas,
Munqati`
or Mu`dal, according to the precise nature of the discontinuity,
or one of a reporter having a disparaged character, such as due to his telling
lies, excessive mistakes, opposition to the narration of more reliable sources,
involvement in innovation, or ambiguity surrounding his person.
The smaller the number and importance of defects,
the less severe the weakness. The more the defects in number and severity, the
closer the hadith will be to being Maudu`
(fabricated).76
Some ahadith, according to the variation
in the nature of the weakness associated with its reporters, rank at the bottom
of the Hasan grade or at the top of the Da`if
grade. Reporters such as `Abdullah b. Lahi'ah (a famous judge from Egypt), `Abd
al-Rahman b. Zaid b. Aslam, Abu Bakr b. Abi Maryam al-Himsi, Faraj b.
Fadalah, and Rishdin b. Sa'd attract such types of varying ranks as they are
neither extremely good preservers nor totally abandoned by the traditionists.77
Maudu`
Al-Dhahabi defines Maudu` (fabricated, forged) as the term applied to a hadith,
the text of which goes against the established norms of the Prophet's sayings
(may Allah bless him and grant him peace), or its reporters include a liar,
e.g. the forty ahadith known as Wad'aniyyah or the small collection of
ahadith which was fabricated and claimed to have been reported by `Ali al-Rida, the eighth
Imam of the Ithna 'Ashari Shi'ah.78
A number of traditionists have collected fabricated
ahadith separately in order to distinguish them from other ahadith;
among them are Ibn al-Jauzi in Al-Maudu`at,
al-Jauzaqani in Kitab al-Abatil,
al-Suyuti in Al-La'ali
al- Masnu'ah fi 'l-Ahadith al-Maudu`ah, and `Ali al-Qari in Al-Maudu`at.
Some of these ahadith were known to be
spurious by the confession of their inventors. For example, Muhammad
b. Sa`id al-Maslub used to say, "It is not wrong to fabricate
an isnad for a sound statement."79 Another notorious inventor, `Abd al-Karim Abu 'l-Auja,
who was killed and crucified by Muhammad b. Sulaiman b. `Ali, governor of Basrah, admitted that he had fabricated
four thousand ahadith declaring lawful the prohibited and vice-versa.80
Maudu`
ahadith are also recognised by external evidence related to a discrepancy
found in the dates or times of a particular incident.81 For example,
when the second caliph, `Umar b. al-Khattab decided to expel the Jews from
Khaibar, some Jewish dignitaries brought a document to `Umar
apparently proving that the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace)
had intended that they stay there by exempting them from the jizyah (tax on
non-Muslims under the rule of Muslims); the document carried the witness of
two Companions, Sa'd b. Mu`adh and Mu'awiyah b. Abi Sufyan. `Umar
rejected the document outright, knowing that it was fabricated because the conquest
of Khaibar took place in 6 AH, whereas Sa'd b. Mu`adh died in 3 AH just
after the Battle of the Trench, and Mu'awiyah embraced Islam in 8 AH, after
the conquest of Makkah!82
The author, in his Criticism
of Hadith among Muslims with reference to Sunan Ibn Majah, has given more examples of fabricated ahadith
under the following eight categories of causes of fabrication:83
- political differences;
- factions based on issues of creed;
- fabrications by zanadiqah (enemies-within spreading
heretical beliefs);
- fabrications by story-tellers;
- fabrications by ignorant ascetics;
- prejudice in favour of town, race or a particular
imam;
- inventions for personal motives;
- proverbs turned into ahadith.
Similar to the last category above is the case
of Isra'iliyat ("Israelite traditions"), narrations from the
Jews and the Christians84 which were wrongly attributed to the Prophet (may Allah
bless him and grant him peace).
Back to
Table of Contents | Previous | Next