A Perspective On Islam By Avner Boskey
I. Is Islam a monotheistic
major world religion?
A. YHVH Is God's Own Name
B. YHVH Calls Himself The
God Of Israel
C. Messiah Yeshua Loves His Bride
D. YHVH Has Chosen
Jerusalem
E. The Pre-Islamic Allah
F. By Their Fruits You Shall Know
Them
G. Are Islam's claims to be tolerated and respected?
II. Are Most
Muslims Peace Loving And Not Terrorists?
III. "Jihad doesn't mean holy
war - Muhammad never taught holy war
A. The Arabic word 'jihad'
B. How the
understanding of 'jihad' has evolved
C. The Return to Classical 'jihad'
D.
The Koran and Hadith on 'jihad'
E. Future 'jihad'
IV. Is the West
prepared for 'jihad'?
V. Prophetic possibilities
VI. How shall we
then respond
Introduction:
Terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and the WTC have
shocked and shaken America. Violent Middle Easterners hijacked civilian
aircraft, yet sought no hostage negotiations. Their purpose was to murder, to
wreak destruction and terror on America's economy, society and democracy. Are
these mujahidin (jihad warriors) a lunatic fringe element of Islam, or do they
represent one of the real faces of that religion? How are believers to relate to
Islam in light of coming prophetic events on the earth? And how can we keep the
mind and heart of Messiah as we interface with our Muslim neighbors?
The
clearly Islamic aspects of the recent terror attacks have prompted public
scrutiny and discussion of the nature of Islam. In past days Muslim advocates
have repeatedly stressed similar themes: Islam is a monotheistic major world
religion; most Muslims are peace loving and not violent; Islam doesn't believe
in jihad as holy war, but in jihad as an ethical movement for self betterment.
Are these statements all true? Let's carefully examine each one of these
assertions.
I. Is Islam a monotheistic major world
religion?
Islam is a major world religion, with more than one billion
followers, including six million in the United States. The five largest Muslim
nations are Indonesia (180 million), Pakistan (125 million), Bangladesh (109
million), India (84 million) and Iran (66 million). Further on down the list,
12th through 15th in size are Sudan and Afghanistan (22 million), Iraq (20
million) and Saudi Arabia (19 million).
Is Islam a monotheistic religion?
That all depends on how one defines 'monotheism'. Monotheism refers to the
belief in one god. But belief in any one god is not exactly the same as belief
in the One True God. While the Bible teaches monotheism, it does not teach a
generic monotheism (i.e., that it is possible for any spirit to be considered
the Supreme Deity). The Bible teaches that the God of Israel whose personal name
is YHVH (commonly known as Jehovah) - He alone is God Most High. The same
Scriptures also clearly teach that the gods worshipped by the pagan nations are
in fact demons (1Ki.18.39; 2Ki.19:18; 1Chron. 16:26; Psa. 96:5; Zech.14:9;
1Cor.8:4-6; Gal.4:8). This may not be a politically correct viewpoint today, but
the Bible focuses on eternal truths and does not try to be a spiritual
chameleon.
Many people today believe that religion's job is to promote
moral and ethical behavior. According to this viewpoint, different religions
with their different spirits, names of god or gods, avatars etc., - all should
be tolerated because these are simply different ways of expressing the same
divine and ethical truths. "Why argue about whether He is called YHVH or Allah,"
they question with exasperation; "Stop quibbling about words!" The Bible does
not agree with this argument and draws a clear line in the sand: righteousness
and strength, justification and salvation are to be found only in the name of
the God of Israel (Isa.45:23-25). From the Bible's perspective, a false god is a
demon, and he who follows a false god engages in idolatry and participates in
counterfeit worship. So the question must be asked: is the name of Allah an
interchangeable name for the One True God, or is Allah in fact a demonic
spirit?
A. YHVH Is God's Own Name
The Bible uses the personal name
YHVH to describe the One True God. God declared to Moses, "Thus you shall say to
the sons of Israel, 'YHVH, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God
of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.' This is My name forever,
and this is My memorial-name to all generations" (Exod.3:15). If the Bible is
true, then God has just stated that the name YHVH is the personal name of God.
It is unchangeable and it lasts forever. This name which God has chosen for
Himself is used nearly 9,000 times in the Bible but not even once in the
Koran.
Messiah Yeshua (Jesus) said that the Hebrew Scriptures are so
reliable that even the smallest letters, the jots ("yod" in Hebrew) and the
tittles (the protrusions or bumps on the Hebrew letters themselves) are
accurate. His point? We all can depend on the reliability of the Hebrew
Scriptures (Matt.5:17-18; 2Tim.3:15-17). In those Scriptures God has given
mankind His own name so that we will all be able to recognize that name
(whenever it appears) as His own signature in history, His personal trademark.
The Bible says that YHVH is what the God of Israel wants to be called.
Considering these biblical ground rules, it is highly significant that the
Islamic Koran neither recognizes nor uses the name YHVH. Instead, 2,100 years
after YHVH revealed His name to Moses, Muhammad arose and declared that God's
unchangeable name YHVH is unimportant, and that believers should now use another
name, a different name - Allah.
B. YHVH Calls Himself The God Of
Israel
YHVH describes Himself repeatedly in the Bible as the God who is
bound by everlasting covenant to Israel. He is the God who loves Israel
(Deut.7:7-9; Hos.2:14-23; 11:1-4,8; 14:4; Amos 9:8-9; etc.). He is the God who
chose Isaac (not Ishmael - Gen.17:18-21) and Jacob as heirs, and the God who
promises to save the Jewish people and restore them to their homeland, the land
of Israel (Isa. 49:5-6; Lk.2:67-77 etc.). Yet the Koran describes its god as
having a different agenda. The first major surah (chapter) in the Koran, "The
Cow" (Surah 2) describes Allah's hatred, rejection and cursing of the Jewish
people (see also Surah 5:64,82; 9:30). The Koran gives priority to Ishmael and
not to Isaac (Surah 2:125,127,133,136,140; 3:84; 4:164; 14:39,163; 19:54)
and
it is silent about YHVH's choosing of Isaac and Jacob. The Koran teaches
that some Jews, as punishment for their sins, have been changed into apes and
pigs (Surah 5:60), Islamic teaching also announces that the Jewish people will
be destroyed by Muslims at the End of Days.
The Hadith, a compilation of
Muhammad's teachings written down after the completion of the Koran, and
considered authoritative by Islam, teaches: ". . . the prophet...said: 'The Hour
(the Day of Judgment) will not
begin until the Muslims fight the Jews and
kill them. A Jew will hide behind a rock or a tree, and the rock or tree will
say, "O Muslim, O slave of Allah! There is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!"
– except for the gharqad (box thorn), for it is one of the trees of the Jews."
(al-Bukhari 2926; Muslim, 2921-2). Incidentally, this verse from the Hadith was
recently quoted in its entirety with approval by Osama Bin Laden in his May 28
1998 interview with John Bell of ABC News, "We are sure of Allah's victory and
our victory against the Americans and the Jews as promised by the prophet, peace
be upon him: 'Judgment day shall not come until the Muslims fight the Jews fight
the Jews, whereas the Jews will hide behind trees and stones, and the tree and
the stone will speak and say "Muslim, behind me a Jew come and kill him", except
for the al-Ghargad tree, which is a Jewish plant'. We are sure of our victory."
Muhammad taught and prophesied that a future holocaust would be carried out by
the Islamic world against the Jewish nation.
If the God of the Bible is the One called YHVH, if He loves and has chosen
the Jewish people for eternity - then Allah cannot be the same as this
God!
C. Messiah Yeshua Loves His Bride
Yeshua (Jesus) is not only
the Messiah of Israel; He also offers the free gift of salvation to the world
(John 10:14-16). All who embrace Yeshua (Jews and Gentiles) are part of the
Bride of Messiah and are deeply loved by Him (Eph.3:1-6; 5:22-27). Yet Allah of
the Koran commands Muslims to have a radically different attitude to Christians
and Jews from what the Bible commands: "Take not Jews and Christians as friends;
they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend,
then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people!"
(Surah 5:51). "O believers! Do not take my enemy and your enemy for friends.
Would you offer them love while they deny what has come to you of the truth,
driving out the rasul (ed., Muhammad) and yourselves because you believe in
Allah your lord? If you go forth in jihad on my path and seeking my pleasure,
would you manifest love to them? I know what you conceal and what you manifest;
and whoever of you does this, he has indeed gone astray from the straight path"
(Surah 3:28; see also Surah 60:1). Not love, but suspicion, rejection,
condemnation and enmity towards Christians and Jews is a foundational part of
Islam.
Islamic art can be the servant of Muslim theology. On the Temple
Mount in Jerusalem, inside the Dome of the Rock, an engraved Arabic inscription
runs along the inside rim of that Golden Dome, proclaiming in beautiful gold
leaf calligraphy: "O People of the Book, do not overstep proper limitations ...
and speak only the truth about Allah. The Messiah Yeshua, son of Mary, is only a
messenger of Allah... Believe therefore in Allah and his messengers, and do not
say 'Three'. . . Allah is only one Allah. Far be it from his glory that he
should have a son." This quote from the Koran (Surah 4:171; see also 5:75)
clearly denies the deity of Messiah Yeshua, His incarnation, and the deity of
the Holy Spirit. In this sacred shrine of Islam, the central place afforded to
this anti-Messiah declaration is no accident.
D. YHVH Has Chosen
Jerusalem
YHVH has chosen Jerusalem out of all the cities of the world to
be His own. This truth is reflected in one of the strongest rebukes addressed to
Satan in the Scriptures: "And YHVH said to Satan, 'YHVH rebuke you, Satan!
Indeed, YHVH who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you!'" (Zech. 3:2) Jerusalem is
called the City of David over 40 times, and the Bible is full of Messianic
promises that the Son of David will rule over the entire world from Jerusalem,
sitting on David's Throne.
Yet the Koran asserts that an oasis in the
Arabian desert - Mecca – is actually Allah's chosen city (Surah 2:125-27; 3:97),
and that the God's temporal ruler comes not from David's seed but from Ishmael's
Arabian descendants (Surah 33:40). The God of the Bible wants to be recognized
by His name and His many loves (the Jewish people, the Church, the city of
Jerusalem, the land of Israel and David's descendants). Islam stands opposed to
all of the above. On this evidence alone one can clearly conclude that Allah is
not the God of the Bible. He does not have the same heart and passions as YHVH.
He does not have the same thoughts as the God of Israel. He is not the same
God.
E. The Pre-Islamic Allah
Most Muslims believe that Allah has
always been the One True God (Surah 2:136: 29:46). They believe that Abraham,
Hagar, Ishmael, Moses, David and Yeshua were all Muslims (e.g. Surah 2:135, 140;
3:67; 22:78). The Koran believes that Jews and Christians have forged and
distorted the Scriptures (Surah 3:71,99). Islam believes that originally, the
Bible was full of references to Allah, Mecca and the Kab'a (the black cube, an
ancient pagan center of pilgrimage in Mecca) but that nearly all these
references have been deliberately removed from the Bible by non-Muslims. But a
brief look at Arabian history prior to Muhammad reveals that the origins of
Allah worship are to be found in pagan polytheism.
In approximately 430
BC Herodotus the Greek historian refers to the fact that various deities were
worshipped in Arabia, including a female deity known as al-il-Lat (The
Histories, Book iii - this word could well be the female form of Allah). The
Koran, written down nearly 1100 years later, refers to the fact that three
female deities named al-Lat (the same word as al-il-Lat), al-Uzza, and Manat
were worshipped in Arabia. People would often turn to these goddesses in
intercession (Surah 53:19-20). These three deities were also known as "the
daughters of Allah", as the edited text of Surah 53:21-22 explains. These three
deities were only some of the many spirits and demons worshipped by Arabs in the
centuries before Muhammad. Another such deity was Hubal - a Moabite/
Nabatean/North Arabian demon - known from stone inscriptions dated to 1-5 AD,
whose idol was a giant stone placed atop the Ka'ba (according to Ibn al-Kalbi.).
Other deities included Isaf and Na'ilah (two lovers who were turned to stone for
cohabiting in the Ka'ba, and whose idols were placed on two little hills, Safa
and Marwa, near the Ka'ba), Awf (a great bird), and Allah.
A book called
'Siratu'l Rasul' ("The Life of the Messenger" – originally written by Ibn Is'haq
in the 600's AD and later revised by Ibn Hisham) recounts a story about Abdu'l
Muttalib, Muhammad's grandfather. He was preparing to sacrifice one of his sons
to "the god at the Ka'ba". This god's name is known from other Muslim sources as
Hubal - possibly a form of the Semitic 'Ha-Ba'al' - 'The Lord'. Hubal was known
as 'rabb al-bayt' or 'lord of the house'. According to Ibn Is'haq, the idol of
Hubal was originally brought from al-Balq'a in Syria to the Ka'ba in Mecca by an
Arab named Amr bin Luhayya. In the above account divination was then used to
determine Hubal's will (by casting arrows to the ground). Muhammad's father
Abd'allah (Arabic for 'slave of Allah' - an indication that Allah was only one
of the many deities worshipped at the Ka'ba) was chosen by divination to be
sacrificed. The grandfather then consulted a sorcerer who counseled him on how
to obtain an answer (through divination) which would satisfy the deity yet leave
Muhammad's father alive.
This was the religious background that shaped
young Muhammad's spiritual world view - sacrificing children, consulting
sorcerers, and worshipping tribal idols. When he was approximately 40 years old,
Muhammad received a spiritual revelation, ostensibly from the angel Gabriel
('Jibril' in Arabic; see Siratu'l Rasul 5:152; Mishkat 4:356-57). This spirit
revealed to him that Allah (the local god of his father Abd'allah) was not just
one deity of many being worshipped in the Ka'ba, but that Allah was actually the
supreme deity. Further, Jibril told him that Allah wanted Muhammad to become his
'rasul' - his apostolic prophet. Muhammad's reaction was anxiety and fear that
he might be going mad. His wife Khadija and her cousin Waraqa reassured him that
his prophesying was similar to what Moses had received. Eventually Muhammad
became convinced of this as well.
Allah, the spirit who for centuries had
seemed content to take his place in the Ka'ba pantheon along with 360 other
demons (that number comes from Waqqidi's biography of Muhammad, written 120
years after Muhammad's death), was suddenly describing himself as the 'only true
god'. A deity who had been content to receive worship in a polytheistic shrine
for centuries was now advocating strict 'monotheism' on his own terms. Allah's
accommodation to polytheism is totally different from what the Bible teaches
about YHVH's response to a polytheistic context (when the Ark of the Covenant
was brought into the Philistine shrine of Dagon in 1Sam.5:1-12)! And so Islam
(Arabic for 'submission' [to Allah]) was born. One of the many demons of the
Arabian desert would now become famous as "Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, The
Beneficent, the Merciful, Master of the Day of Judgment" - 'The One True God'.
Monotheism had been suddenly redefined by Muhammad to mean the worship of a
desert spirit as the One True God.
F. By Their Fruits You Shall Know
Them
The spirit known as Jibril would later give Muhammad many
revelations, including the following - God has rejected and cursed the Jews and
the Christians (Surah 2:89,105,213; 9:30); Yeshua is not God's Son (Surah 4:171;
5:72-75; 19:88-93; cf. 1 John 2:18-23); there is no Trinity (Surah 5:116-18);
the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, has been deliberately distorted by Jews
and Christians to the point where it is no longer the word of God (Surah
2:113,120,159; 4:46; 5:41; 57:27); Yeshua never died on the cross (Surah 4:157);
it is a 'divine' commandment to persecute Jews and Christians, to defeat them in
battle and then to consign them either to slavery or to death (Surah 8:39;
9:5,29: 47:4).
These Koranic teachings mentioned above cannot be
biblically described as 'good and peaceful'. They are anti-Jewish and
anti-Christian. And they are not teachings which only represent 'some extreme
sect of Islam'. These are Muhammad's own words in the Koran and the Hadith! The
spirit who communicated these teachings to Muhammad was neither the God of the
Bible nor His messenger. Allah is not Jehovah, and Islam can not be described as
a biblically monotheistic religion. Though Islam worships a spirit whom it calls
'the one true God', the Bible classifies that spirit as a demon. Islam is not
true biblical monotheism. It is actually a demonic counterfeit of true
monotheism.
At Washington's National Cathedral a memorial service for the
victims of the terror attacks was held on September 17. One Christian minister
prayed "O God of Abraham, God of Muhammad ..." In light of the above referenced
Islamic teaching, one point must be emphasized: the God of Israel is the Lord of
every man, and in that sense He is the God of Muhammad, Buddha and Bin Laden.
But if the prayer quoted above meant to say that the God of Muhammad (Allah) is
the same deity as the God of Abraham, then this is bearing false witness,
biblically speaking. Allah is not the God of Abraham, and Allah is not the God
of the Bible.
G. Are Islam's claims to be tolerated and
respected?
Islam is one of the world's major religions, but it fails the
biblical test of being considered true monotheism, since Allah and the
revelation he gave to Muhammad are fundamentally opposed to the Bible. This
should not be surprising to Bible believers, since paganism and demonic worship
are the spiritual matrix out of which Allah was elevated. In a pluralistic
world, all religions (whether true or false) are to be tolerated and afforded
legal protection. It is not the primary concern of a secular state to judge the
truth-claims of any one religion. Judaism and Buddhism, Satanism and
Christianity, Islam and Wicca – all have the right to exist and propagate their
beliefs. In that sense, in a secular society Islam is to be tolerated and
respected. Its teachings should not be mocked; its mosques and madrasas (Islamic
seminaries) should be free from attack; its adherents should be treated with
courtesy, friendliness and respect.
At the same time, it should be
remembered that the Koran claims that only Islam's religious positions are true,
and that Christianity's and Judaism's claims are distorted or even willfully
misleading. Since Islam is free to preach and teach according to that religious
perspective, it is only logical that Christians and Jews should exercise their
own freedom of religion when it comes to pointing out where Islam departs
radically from biblical truth. Bible believers should also not be ashamed to
point out where Islam's origins fall under the biblical description of being
pagan and demonic.
A few pages from now the question of jihad (holy war)
will be considered. It will be seen that Islam teaches about a future world
battle between Islam on the one hand, and what we now call Western Christianity
and secular democracy on the other. Islamic forces will conquer the West and, in
this future Islamic dictatorship, Christians who willingly submit to Muslim rule
will have limited civil rights and a nearly slave status. However, if they
oppose Islam they are to be massacred. Secularists will be given a simpler
choice - conversion to Islam or the death penalty. The fate of the Jews is the
clearest – they will simply be slaughtered.
Though these future jihad
actions may now be explained by Muslim clerics to be an Islamic statement of
respect and tolerance for defeated non-believers, the rest of the world may not
so willingly appreciate or
embrace these same definitions. A look around the
planet at the turn of the 21st century reveals that respect and toleration for
other religions tend to characterize democracies. Such religious freedoms are
not found in countries ruled by Islamic dictatorships today (e.g., Saudi Arabia,
Iran, Sudan, Afghanistan, etc.). Islam cannot have it both ways - it cannot
simultaneously portray itself in the West as a champion of democratic principles
of respect and toleration for other religions, and still remain true to
Muhammad's call for jihad. Islam foresees and calls for a violent armed clash
between Muslims and the other nations. Watchmen who point this out are not
fostering religious hatred or hatred of Islam. To point out these Islamic
teachings is to speak the truth and to deliver a prophetic
warning.
II. Are Most Muslims Peace Loving And Not
Terrorists?
Part of this question can be answered quickly and
positively. Many Muslims are peace loving and desire nothing more than to raise
their families and lead a quiet life. Muslims are human beings made in the image
of the God of Israel. They share a common humanity with all other descendants of
Adam and Eve, and no one should forget that their hopes and joys are very
similar to every other person's hopes and joys. As well, most Muslims are not
terrorists. Only a small percentage of Muslims would be classified by Western or
Israeli intelligence services as terrorists.
But this is only part of the
story. What the West considers terrorism, many Muslims consider Islamic heroism.
There is great support internationally in the Muslim street for Osama Bin Laden,
for anti-American and anti-Israeli terror, for Sadaam Hussein and for violent
jihad. Spurred on by calls to jihad, the Islamic masses can be very quickly
roused to uncontrolled riots and frightening displays of pro-terrorist violence.
Recent riots in Pakistan, Kashmir, Indonesia and Gaza are current, frightening
examples. Much violence has also occurred in the Islamic world when Muslims
fight against Muslim (e.g., when Islamic military dictatorships with a more
secular world view attempt to crush Muslim fundamentalist organizations, or when
radical Islamic groups try to destabilize and overthrow Muslim military
regimes). Though Muslims are not necessarily violent, an unusual degree of
violence does characterize many Islamic societies. A brief description of recent
Muslim violence in various Islamic countries brings this point
home.
Algeria has been reeling from a war between GIA (Armed Islamic
Group - radical Muslim terrorists) and its established government (a more
secular Muslim military dictatorship) since 1992. Gruesome reports of
entire
villages having their throats slit, famous pop singers assassinated for singing
Western influenced music, government instigated massacres of regions whose
loyalties are suspect - these have left more than 70,000 murdered over the past
9 years. GIA cells are believed to have cooperated in Bin Laden's September 11
attacks.
Libya is an Islamic dictatorship under Muammar al-Qaddafi. It
has been one of the chief training centers for world terrorism, and has executed
many attacks such as the bombing of a Berlin discotheque in March 1986 where US
solders were murdered, as well as the terrorist bombing of Pan Am flight 103
over Lockerbie, Scotland in December 1988. It has cooperated with Pakistan in
the funding and development of an Islamic nuclear bomb, as well as developing
chemical warfare abilities. Libya has been a main supporter of such terrorist
groups as the Columbian M-19, Red Brigades, IRA, Ahmed Jibril's PFLP, Arafat's
PLO etc. In the 1970's Qaddafi awarded Yasir Arafat $5 million in recognition of
his terror operation at the 1972 Munich Olympics which led to the massacre of
Israeli athletes.
Egypt's President Sadat was assassinated by terrorists
associated with Egyptian Islamic Jihad in October 1981. This group was later
co-planner of the World Trade Center bombings in 1993 and seems to have been
involved in the September 2001 attack as well. Its top leader was Ayman
al-Zawahiri (one of the planners of Sadat's assassination) who now functions as
Osama Bin Laden's top deputy for military operations. In the 1950s Egypt
originally financed, trained and ran the first terrorist raids of the fedayin,
and in 1964 helped establish the PLO as a terrorist organization. Egypt was also
the first Islamic country to use poison gas against fellow Muslims in the North
Yemen war of 1962-67. The Christian Copts of the Egyptian Nile Valley have been
subject to decades of torture, murder, raping and destruction of property on a
regular basis, with a blind eye being turned by Muslim authorities.
Sudan
is considered one of world terrorism's main centers. Osama Bin Laden has a
strong network in that country. According to the US Grand Jury indictment
against Osama Bin Laden, the bombers of the US Embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and
Dar es-Salaam, Tanzania were trained and sent out from that country.
The
Islamic dictatorship 'National Islamic Front' ruling Sudan has been overseeing
the massacre, enslavement, rape and murder of the Christian and animist
inhabitants of Southern Sudan, forcibly converting survivors and prisoners to
Islam. Years ago the NIF proclaimed a jihad against its 'domestic enemy', and
since 1983 more than 1.9 million people have been murdered or have been caused
to die as a result of the actions of the NIF in southern Sudan and the Nuba
mountains.
Syria and Lebanon are also a world center of terrorism, as
well as of opium and hashish cultivation. Between 1975-82 over 100,000 Lebanese
were killed in the Lebanese civil war between the PLO, the Shiite and Sunni
Muslims, the Druze and the Maronite Christians. In the Syrian-controlled Bekaa
Valley the Hezbollah terrorist groups train and send out forces to attack
Israel. According to the US State Department's Office of the Coordinator for
Counter-terrorism's 2000 report, Syria oversees the following terrorist networks
operating and training in Lebanon's Bekaa: Hezbollah, Osama Bin Laden's
al-Qa'ida (Arabic, 'The Base') network, Hamas, the Palestine Islamic Jihad,
George Habash's PFLP-GC, Asbat al-Ansar, and several local Sunni extremist
organizations. Other sources would add the names of the Japanese Red Army and
the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Syria not only controls Lebanon's terrorist training
camps, but allows Islamic terrorists to base out of Damascus. In February 1982
the Syrian city of Hama was subject to a 27 day siege. The Syrian Army under the
command of Rifa'at Assad surrounded the city and trapped possibly 100 members of
the Muslim Brotherhood who were opposed to President Assad's regime. Artillery
shelling of that city caused between 10,000 and 38,000 civilian casualties.
Fifteen thousand people were untraceable as a result of the massacre. In
September 2001 two PFLP terrorist were arrested crossing into Israel from
Jordan, having been trained in Syria to blow up the two towers of Tel Aviv's
Azrieli Center.
Jordan became a base of PLO terror operations against
Israel between 1964 and 1970. When the PLO tried to overthrow King Hussein's
government in September 1970 to set up a terrorist dictatorship in its stead,
the king responded by unleashing his Bedouin Legionnaires against the PLO.
Approximately 3,500 were killed during those weeks in 'Black September', with
many terrorists actually escaping to Israel to request asylum.
The
Palestinian Authority continues to engage in open terrorism. Of the 176 Jewish
terror victims in the past year, 71 of them were committed by members of the PA
security forces. Calls for a jihad against the Jewish people and for the
destruction of the State of Israel are regularly broadcast on PA controlled
radio and television. On September 11, the day of the World Trade Center
bombing, the PA controlled newspaper al-Hayat al-Jadida declared, "The suicide
bombers of today are the noble successors of the Lebanese bombers, who taught
the US Marines a tough lesson. These suicide bombers are the salt of the earth,
the engines of history. They are among the most honorable people among us." The
PA appointed Mufti Ekrima Sabri gave a sermon at the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem
in late August 2001, in which he called on Allah "to destroy the United States
and Great Britain, as well as those who help the two countries".
Saudi
Arabia continues to bankroll many terrorist groups, though the funding mostly
comes through private individuals. Many terrorist organizations receive
substantial chunks of their funding through the
government-tolerated
generosity of the Saudis. Jews are forbidden to set foot in Saudi Arabia, and
anti-Jewish literature is readily available. Christian houses of worship are
illegal, and Christians who are discovered practicing their faith are often
arrested, tortured and sometimes beheaded.
Iran is the center of Shi'ite
Islam, and a world leader in exporting terrorism. It is a haven for many
terrorist organizations, and funds Hezbollah's and Islamic Jihad's activities
against Israel. Iran also supports and offers safe haven to Algeria's GIA,
Egypt's Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya, Hamas, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, PFLP-GC,
Kurdistan Worker's Party, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, etc. Iran's government
held US embassy personnel hostage for 444 days in 1979-80, and has been linked
to many top terror attacks around the world. It has continually called for the
destruction of the Great Satan (USA) and the Little Satan (Israel) through
jihad.
Hezbollah's former leader is Imad Mugniyeh, the planner and
mastermind of Hezbollah kidnappings, suicide bombings and many especially
violent airplane hijackings. He is also the man who oversaw the torture to death
of William Buckley (the CIA station chief in Beirut) and the bombing of the
Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aries in 1992. At present he resides in Iran and in
recent months has had significant contact with Bin Laden's top leadership,
including Ayman al-Zawahari. The September 11 hijackings show strikingly similar
tradecraft to Mugniyeh's methods.
Iraq is perhaps the most well known
country which both exports terrorism and murders its own citizens. In March 1988
Sadaam Hussein launched a chemical warfare attack against the town of Halabja in
northern Iraq. Mustard gas and nerve gases were deployed. Between 5,000 and
12,000 Iraqi Kurds were killed immediately, and an estimated minimum of 40,000
were injured. His brutality against the Kurds, the Iranians and the Kuwaitis
have earned him the Arabic title 'the butcher of Baghdad'. Sadaam has stirred up
riots across the Muslim world by his declarations that he is leading a jihad
against the forces of the godless West and of Israel. His drive to obtain
non-conventional weapons (atomic, biological and chemical) coupled with his
cruel invasion of Kuwait, triggered the Gulf War of 1991. Sadaam was one of the
few world leaders who publicly applauded the recent attacks on the WTC and the
Pentagon.
Afghanistan's non-Arab country is ruled by the Islamic Taliban
dictatorship. It is a center for training some of the most radical and violent
Islamic terrorists, and the center of Bin Laden's al-Qa'ida network. The cruelty
of this Islamic regime against its own people is internationally known and
documented. Eight Christians working for the humanitarian aid organization
"Shelter" are facing the death penalty for the alleged crime of sharing their
faith with Afghanis.
Pakistan is a non-Arab Muslim country. Christians
accused of sharing their faith in Pakistan have been jailed, tortured and
lynched. Osama Bin Laden has many contacts with Pakistan's intelligence
community and has received active support from many sources in Pakistan. Over
30,000 Pakistanis fought as jihad warriors against Russian forces in
Afghanistan. Recent violent anti-American riots and calls for jihad against the
West show the volatile nature of many Pakistani Muslims. Recently President
Musharraf publicly accused Hindus and Jews of plotting against Pakistan. This
was partially done in an effort to divert Muslim anger away from Pakistan's
leaders, who are cooperating with America against fellow Muslims in Afghanistan
and the mujahid Bin Laden.
Indonesia, a non-Arab Muslim country, has
recently seen horrendous Muslim instigated riots against Indonesian and
immigrant Chinese Christians. A campaign of targeted rapes, murders and church
burnings throughout Indonesia has garnered world media attention.
This
brief survey of violence and terrorism in Muslim countries, and the solid
evidence of widespread Islamic support for Muslim terrorist organizations,
refutes the accuracy of the mantra that many are repeating today, that Islam is
simply 'the way of peace' and that there is no such thing as Islamic terrorism.
There are a sizable and active number of Muslim organizations and Islamic
countries which support, export and engage in terrorism against Western targets.
They are not a lunatic fringe. They are following Muhammad's command to engage
in jihad - Islamic holy war (more on this in a few pages).
Though not all
Islamic terrorism is sponsored by Arabs, the lion's share of it brings together
two potent elements - Islam and the Arab people. An example: of the 26 terrorist
organizations whose identities have been
published and whose financial
holdings in the US have been seized, all are Islamic and most are Arab-led. Part
of the key to this volatile mix may be found in the Bible, in Genesis 16:10-12.
There the Angel of the Lord prophesies to Hagar concerning her yet to be born
son Ishmael. "I will greatly multiply your descendants so that they shall be too
many to count . . . Behold, you are with child, and you shall bear a son. And
you shall call his name Ishmael, because the Lord has given heed to your
affliction. And he will be a wild donkey of a man. His hand will be against
everyone, and everyone's hand will be against him, and he will live to the east
of (ed., or in opposition to/against) all of his brothers."
This
prophetic word has shaped much of the destiny of the greater Arab nation and its
relationship with the world.Fierce independence, a wild and untamable soul, and
arrogant animosity can characterize Arab dealings (at their worst) with the
world. But the Arab world at its best manifests freedom of abandoned worship,
generosity, graciousness and sacrificial zeal. When Messiah Jesus is allowed to
transform their hearts, the descendants of Ishmael will find God bringing sweet
out of the bitter, and they will discover the beauty of their Abrahamic
connection in a totally new way. Peace and cooperation will supplant wildness
and strife, and love between Arab and Jewish cousins will bloom again.
We
must remember that God has a heart overflowing with compassion and saving love
for the multitude of Ishmael's sons and daughters. The Living One who saw Hagar
and her son dying of thirst in the wilderness, has preserved Ishmael's line for
redemptive purposes as well. Great revival will break out throughout the Arab
world but prior to this, believing Jews and Gentiles need to be willing to pay
the price in prayers, tears and blood to see the Arab world set free from the
demonic deception known as Islam.
Another biblical passage that may have
some bearing is Psalm 120. The Jewish psalmist complains that he has become
exasperated in his having to deal with deceitfulness and warlike strife in the
tents of Kedar (an ancient name for an Arabian tribe). "Too long has my soul had
its dwelling with those who hate peace. I am for peace, but when I speak, they
are for war" (Psa.120:6-7). It seems that not much has changed in 3,000 years.
The Arab people have long had the tendency to see themselves at war with the
world. The Bible indicates that this tendency goes back not only to the jihad of
Muhammad's day, but even to the days of Ishmael and King David.
A third
passage which helps to explain the spiritual dynamic of Islam is Hebrews
12:15-17. This passage is based on two scriptures in Gen.25. In Gen.25:22-23
YHVH prophesies to Rebecca that the right of firstborn inheritance (physically
and spiritually) will rest on Jacob the second born. In Gen.25:31-34 Esau
fulfils the prophetic word by selling his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of red
lentil pottage. The Book to the Hebrews notes that a root of bitterness sprang
up in Esau's heart after God affirmed that Jacob would indeed possess the
promise. "See to it that no one comes short of the grace of God; that no root of
bitterness springing up causes trouble, and by it many be defiled; that there be
no immoral or godless person like Esau, who sold his birthright for a single
meal. For you know that even afterwards, when he desired to inherit the
blessing, he was rejected, for he found no place for repentance, though he
sought for it with tears". This bitter root based on jealousy of Jacob has
spiritually defiled the majority of the Arab peoples. Satan has complicated
matters by using Islam to fan the flames of hatred toward the Jewish people -
first among the Arabs, and then through them to the rest of the Islamized world.
Islam has perpetuated this spiritual striving, elevating it to the level of a
religious commandment.
Another spiritual factor concerning the Arab
people is found in Isaac's prophetic word over Esau, given after Jacob had
received the right of the firstborn: "'I have made [Jacob] lord over you and
have made all his relatives his servants, and I have sustained him with grain
and new wine. . . Your dwelling will be away from the earth's richness, away
from the dew of heaven above. You will live by the sword and you will serve your
brother. But when you grow restless, you will throw his yoke from off your
neck.' Esau held a grudge against Jacob because of the blessing his father had
given him. He said to himself, "The days of mourning for my father are near;
then I will kill my brother Jacob." When Rebecca was told what her older son
Esau had said, she sent for her younger son Jacob and said to him, "Your brother
Esau is consoling himself with the thought of killing you"
(Gen.27:37,39-42).
Isaac says that Esau's descendants would eventually
move away from the land of Israel and make their home in the deserts. This
process began when Esau moved to Edom, the desert area between southern Jordan
and Saudi Arabia. Isaac adds that they would not make their living so much from
agriculture as from the sword - from conquest, and from pillaging and plundering
desert caravans. The Bedouin of the Arabian desert, and specifically Muhammad's
followers from Yathrib/Medina, began the expansion of Islam by raiding peaceful
trading caravans. Islam's first military exploits did not involve spreading the
religion of Allah, but they were simply piracy -attacking and despoiling other
Arabs on their way to the pagan shrines of Mecca. These raids were known in
Arabic as razzia, and were an old pre-Islamic Arabian custom. Muhammad himself
organized 82 raids, leading between 19 and 26 of them personally. Within a short
time robbing, raping and murder would be elevated to a spiritual commandment
called 'jihad for the sake of Allah'. Isaac's prophecy over Esau was about to
come true with devastating results for the startled inhabitants of Africa, Asia
and southern Europe.
But God has not only spoken hard words over the Arab
people. The Hebrew prophets proclaim that a radically different prophetic vision
will transform many Middle Easterners at the End of Days. Isaiah speaks of a day
yet future when many Arabs will turn to the God of Jacob and find His healing.
This will not be considered a day of defeat for the Arab nations, but rather an
entrance into true victory and blessing as the rift in Abraham's family will
finally be healed. Ishmael and Esau will at last find joy and covenantal
blessing as they embrace their Jewish cousins, accepting them as the ones who
have received the right of inheritance which belongs to the firstborn. "In that
day there will be an altar to the Lord in the heart of Egypt, and a monument to
the Lord at its border. So the Lord will make himself known to the Egyptians,
and in that day they will acknowledge the Lord. . . In that day there will be a
highway from Egypt to Assyria. The Assyrians will go to Egypt and the Egyptians
to Assyria. The Egyptians and Assyrians will worship together. In that day
Israel will be the third, along with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing on the earth.
The Lord Almighty will bless them, saying, 'Blessed be Egypt My people, Assyria
My handiwork, and Israel My inheritance'" (Isa.19:19,21,23-25).
One of
the keys to peace between the sons of Ishmael and the sons of Israel lies in the
hands of the Jewish people. When God grants Israel grace, humility and
revelation, the Jewish people will be able to honor
and respect Ishmael and
Esau as Abraham and Isaac's physically firstborn sons - though God's 'promise of
the firstborn' will always remain Isaac's and Jacob's inheritance.
Even
though Abraham's earthly family remains very dysfunctional, believers should
remember that the Arab nation is the Jewish people's elder brother. Pray that
the fractured physical family of Abraham will be healed in fullness, Even today,
honor and slighted honor is a powerful dynamic among Arab people and the source
of much conflict.
Pray that the Jewish people grow deep enough in grace
to bless and honor their Arab brothers, bringing healing and restoration. Pray
that God will so transform Arab and Jewish hearts that Jews will request wise
and godly counsel from their Arab brothers, and that Arabs will gladly share
their "older brotherly" wisdom and protection with younger brother Jacob, the
Jewish people whom God calls "the firstborn son among all the nations"
(Exod.4:22-23).
III. "Jihad doesn't mean holy war - Muhammad never
taught holy war."
The recent focus on jihad and mujahidin has caused
some Islamic spokesmen in the West to declare that Islam does not believe in
holy war, and that anyone who believes this is defaming Islam and is ignorant of
Arabic. Most Westerners are ignorant about Islam and Arabic, and are also
committed to a form of secular pluralism. When accusations are levelled at them,
many Westerners simply step back, lower their heads and mumble, "I'm sorry! No
offense intended to you or your religion!" Ever since the terror attacks
occurred on the Pentagon and on New York City, Hollywood and the State
Department have stepped into the gap, attempting to lower tensions and dissipate
American anger against Islam.
Pop stars and politicians, movie stars and
TV show hosts have suddenly become authorities on Islam, reading from prepared
scripts which quote from the Koran (usually out of context) and describe Islam
in glowing terms as a peaceful religion which only wants to worship its God in
peace and quietness. The Koran and Hadith (authoritative Muslim commentary)
describe jihad very clearly, and their description does not jibe with what many
talking heads are confidently proclaiming. These next sections set forth Islamic
teaching on jihad from the source documents, explain how these teachings are
reflected in both the Muslim view of the End of Days and in the terror and
violence of the 'mujahidin of the apocalypse', and suggest some prophetic
possibilities as to how this rapidly developing crisis may play out.
A.
The Arabic word 'jihad'
Jihad is derived from the Arabic root jhd and its
primary meaning is 'to strive', 'to exert oneself', or 'determined effort'. One
who participates in jihad is a mujahid (plural mujahidin). In the Koran the term
jihad is usually followed by the statement fi sabil Illah ('in the path of
Allah') and nearly always refers to war and conquest in Allah's name. There are
other Arabic words that refer to war, such as harb ('to put to the sword') or
qital ('to slay'), but jihad is the Koran's term of preference for holy war -
conquest of non-Muslims, their territories and possessions - in the name of
Allah, as well as giving pagan survivors the choice between death and conversion
to Islam. The Hadith, a compilation of Muhammad's teachings written down after
the completion of the Koran and considered authoritative by Islam, is the second
most important source of Islamic law (Shari`a). The term jihad as used in the
most authoritative hadith (Sahih al-Bukhari) has 199 references, all of which
define jihad as warfare. The world famous Orientalist scholar Bernard Lewis
states that "the overwhelming majority of classical theologians, jurists and
traditionalists . . . understood the obligation of jihad in a military sense"
(Bernard Lewis, The Political Language of Islam, Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1988, p. 72). The original and classical Islamic use of the term jihad in
both Koran and the Hadith means armed warfare conducted against
unbelievers.
B. How the understanding of 'jihad' has evolved
At
first glance the issue seems to be clear: Islam's most authoritative and
original sources teach that jihad is holy war. Why should any Muslims disagree?
For example, why does the Council on American-Islamic Relations' web page state
that "'Jihad' does not mean 'holy war.' . . . It is a central and broad Islamic
concept that includes struggle against evil inclinations within oneself,
struggle to improve the quality of life in society, struggle in the battlefield
for self-defence (e.g., - having a standing army for national defense), or
fighting against tyranny or oppression"? CAIR's definitions do not reflect the
classical Arabic and Koranic uses of the term 'jihad'. Why are the clear facts
being blurred?
The answer has to do with three factors. The first factor
is that spin doctors might be concerned about present public relations, not
about Koranic accuracy. The second factor is that Muslims in the West are
concerned about anti-Islamic persecutions, and consider it better to fudge the
truth for the sake of temporary peace, than tell the truth and face massive
discrimination. The third factor deals with how Islam has fared in history.
Islam has undergone political and theological changes since its inception. At
Islam's birth, Muhammad defined jihad as holy war, and for at least a century
that is how Islam's leaders understood the call. Islam spread from Mecca to
Mesopotamia, from Persia to the Pyrenees, from India to Israel - all through
wars of conquest. At one point in history Islam had nearly conquered the known
world at the point of a scimitar. But eventually Islamic forces were stopped. In
France Charles Martel broke the wave of Muslim conquest at the Battle of
Poitiers in 732. Alfonso VIII of Castile broke the Almohad (Moorish) hold on
Spain in the Battle of Las Navos de Tolosa in 1212, leading to the emigration of
one million Moors back to Morocco. The Byzantine kings kept up a barrier against
the Islamic onslaught from the 600's until 1453, when their city of
Constantinople was overrun by the Turks. Three days of murder, rape and robbery
were permitted to the Islamic jihad victors.
Austria and Hungary held
firm against the green banner of Islam, preventing them from battering down the
very gates of Vienna in 1529 and 1566. Finally in 1683 Islam's throttling grasp
on the nations of Europe began to be broken, with the defeat of the Ottoman
forces of Kara Mustafa by John III of Poland at the Battle of Vienna. Over one
thousand years of Islamic jihad conquest and rule was now beginning to be
reversed. At the dawn of Islam in the seventh century AD, when Islam's Bedouin
armies had been sweeping across the known world and conquering at the point of
the sword, Muhammad's teachings on jihad were not disputed by Muslims. They were
incorporated into the Koran and the Hadith, and formed a bedrock of Islamic
teaching and practice. But when the Muslim momentum of conquest began to be
blunted, the theology of jihad began to metamorphose. Temporary treaties were
allowed with the enemy, in order to allow Islamic forces time to consolidate
forces and then to attack again. Occasionally the nearly slave status granted to
Jews and Christians (the dhimmi status granted to Dar al-Kitab, the 'people of
the Book') was relaxed because Islam was in need of their professional services.
In certain cases pagans were granted improved conditions for the same
reasons.
Islamic jurists began to develop new theological terms. At first
the world was to be divided into two sectors - Dar al-Islam (the zone or abode
of Islam, where Islamic law is rigorously carried out) and Dar al-Harb (the zone
of the sword/warfare, where unbelievers lived who needed to be conquered and
converted or slain). This view of the world implied that perpetual warfare would
exist between Muslims and non-Muslims, until Islam would absorb or conquer Dar
al-Harb. Other jurists would later suggest a third possibility (after Islamic
military advances were stalled and cease-fire treaties were signed) - Dar
al-Sulh (the zone of peace treaty) or Dar al-Ahd (the zone of covenant).
Non-stop war would not have to be immediately waged. Treaties afforded Muslim
governments time to re-arm and then renew jihad at a later and more auspicious
date. As corruption began to predominate in many Islamic leaders, and as
succession wars and murderous rivalries began to characterize Muslim rulers, a
new wave of zealous Islamic preachers and teachers arose. These called for the
overthrow of all Islamic leaders who were comfortable with the status quo
standoff, or who had abandoned jihad in favor of accommodation with pagans or
Christians.
These new Islamic firebrands declared that Muslim leaders who
failed to enforce Muslim religious law (the Shari'a) rigorously (including the
necessity of jihad) had forfeited the right to rule. Led by the teachings of Ibn
Taymiya (1268-1328), they now redefined jihad to include the overthrow of
established Islamic governments who had abandoned Muhammad's original zeal for
conquest. They also declared that professing Muslims who do not live strictly
according to the Shari'a are unbelievers, and that jihad must be waged against
them as well. Other Muslim groups who came to the same conclusions included the
Kharijis/Khawarij in the 600's and the Assassins/Hashishin in the 1000's AD.
Finally another major development in the evolution of jihad came through the
Sufi movement. Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali (1059-1111) taught that there is a
distinction between lesser jihad (al-jihad al-asghar) and greater jihad
(al-jihad al-akbar). What was now called 'lesser jihad' still meant holy war and
it still involved the conquest of pagans, Jews and Christians at the point of
the sword. But now the term 'greater jihad' would be understood to refer to
personal struggle against inner evil. Al-Ghazali envisioned the body as a city
governed by the human soul yet also under attack by evil desires. A purported
tradition which is hotly disputed in Islam and not found in the Koran or the
more authoritative hadiths, describes how Muhammad supposedly came back from a
jihad battle and declared, "We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad." When asked, "What is the greater jihad?" he replied, "It is the
struggle against oneself."
Many Muslims have been influenced by this Sufi
form of Islam, and think of jihad more as a personal struggle against evil,
rather than as holy war for the sake of Allah. Yet al-Ghazali's teaching
provoked charges of heresy from Ibn Taymiya and his follower Ibn al-Qayyim
al-Jawziya (1292-1350), who declared that al-Ghazali's hadith quoted above was a
deliberate fabrication and a violation of Muhammad's teachings on jihad in the
Koran. Today modern Muslims have various definitions of jihad that they can
choose from. Some use the term jihad in good faith to mean totally non-violent
behavior. Many others, especially in the Middle East and Asia, understand jihad
to be armed conflict. It is important to point out that an honest examination of
classical Islam forces one to conclude: Muhammad taught and practiced jihad as
holy war; that is how Islam's first leaders and theologians understood the term;
that is exactly how Islamic terrorists define their own actions. Other more
esoteric Muslim understandings of jihad do not erase the fact that 'armed
conquest and conversion or murder of unbelievers' is Islam's original
understanding of the term.
C. The Return to Classical 'jihad'
A
significant and growing group of Islamic activists (including Bin Laden)
considers those who champion the peaceful 'greater jihad' to be anti-Islamic,
cowardly, accommodationist and heretical. Their understanding is that jihad as
armed attack is the heart and cornerstone of Islam, and that Islam's weakened
status in the world is due to the abandoning of jihad by apostate Islamic
leaders and teachers. These pro-jihad Islamic activists include the assassins of
Egypt's President Anwar al-Sadat. Sadat's assassins were followers of the blind
Sheikh Omar Abd al-Rahman (now a prisoner in a US penitentiary) and his Egyptian
Islamic Jihad (Jama'at al-Jihad) group. The assassination was defended in an
Islamic pamphlet (written by Muhammad Abd al-Salaam Faraj) titled "The Neglected
Obligation" (al-Farida al-Gha'ibah). Faraj called for the assassination of
Muslim leaders who will not engage in jihad, and promised Muslims that Islam's
victorious jihad conquest of the world is inevitable (see Johannes Jansen, The
Neglected Duty: The Creed of Sadat's Assassins and Islamic Resurgence in the
Middle East (New York: Macmillan, 1986). Faraj was later put to death by
Egypt.
Another modern and influential prophet of jihad was the Shi'ite
Muslim Ayatollah Ruhullah Khomeini (1903-1989). He called for jihad as armed
actions, stating that "by means of jihad . . . (Islamic jurists) must expose and
overthrow tyrannical rulers and rouse the people so the universal movement of
all alert Muslims can establish Islamic government in the place of tyrannical
regimes". When Islamic teachers truly communicate these points, this will cause
"the entire population to become mujahidin" (Ruhullah Khomeini, Islamic
Government, Text in Islam and Revolution: Writings and Declarations of Imam
Khomeini, trans. & annotated Hamid Algar; Berkeley: Mizan Press, 1981, p.
108, 132). His teachings led the nation of Iran to overthrow the Shah and turn
180 degrees against America. This sudden radical 'Islamization' of Iran caught
the US by surprise and totally disrupted American foreign policy in the Middle
East. Khomeini's present influence on modern radical Islam is very
strong.
In 1995, sixteen years after Iran embraced Khomeni's vision of
jihad, some in the US intelligence community had not yet read the writing on the
wall. "Ambassador Philip Wilcox, coordinator of the Office of Counter- Terrorism
of the U.S. Department of State, declared: 'There is no link between Islam and
violence and terrorism. That is a canard which we want to dismiss at the outset.
Nor is there a worldwide Islamic network somehow waging jihad against the West.
This is a concept that's brooded about sometimes, and there is virtually no
intelligence information to suggest that such a network exists'" (article by
Paul Findlay, Republican - Illinois; Washington Report on Middle East Affairs,
March 1995, p. 20). Paul Findlay is on record as an advocate of Arab and Islamic
causes (he was called "Yasser Arafat's favorite congressman" by Jon Margolis,
national political correspondent for the Chicago Tribune). That is his
democratic right. What is of concern is that agents of US counter-terrorism
could have been so off-base in their appraisals. Could this lack of clear
thinking perhaps reflect in some way how the American intelligence community was
so ill-prepared for the events of September 11 2001?
Most Americans are
now convinced that a worldwide Islamic terror network exists. But the cost of
unbelief has been high. With the future in mind, consider Osama Bin Laden's
predictions on May 28 1998 in these selected
quotes from John Miller's
interview with him on ABC News: We look at ourselves and our brethren as
worshipers of Allah who created us to worship him and follow his books and
prophets. I am one of Allah's
worshipers. I worship Allah, which includes
carrying out the jihad to raise Allah's word and evict the Americans from all
Muslim land . . . We are sure of Allah's victory and our victory against the
Americans and the Jews as promised by the prophet peace be up on him . . . Our
battle with the Americans is larger than our battle with the Russians . . . We
predict a black day for America and the end of the United States as 'United'
States . . . (The USA) will retreat from our land and collect the bodies of its
sons back to America. Allah willing . . . any government that sells its people's
interests and betrays its people and takes actions that removes it from the
Muslim nation will not succeed. We predict that the Riyadh (ed., Saudi) leader
and those with him . . . will disintegrate. They have left the Muslim nation. We
predict that like the Iran Royal family, the Shah, they will disperse and
disappear . . . The Muslim masses are moving towards liberating the Muslim
worlds. Allah willing, we will win . . . A great meeting took a place a few days
ago in Pakistan, and it was attended by 150 scholars in Pakistan . . . great
joint fatwas were passed . . . the International Islamic Front for the Jihad
Against Jews and Crusaders was formed, which we are a member of with other
groups. It has a higher council to coordinate rousing the Muslim nation to carry
out jihad against the Jews and the Crusaders. . . The American Government is
driving America to destruction ... so, we tell the Americans as a people . . .
if they value their lives and those of their children, find a nationalistic
government that will look after their interests and not the interest of the
Jews. The continuation of the tyranny will bring the fighting to America . . .
We would like to stress that we are in close contact with Muslim masses, praise
be to Allah. The issue of liberating Holy Lands is not my personal desire, but I
am just a worshiper of Allah and one of Allah's soldiers in the Muslim nation.
The movement is driving fast and light(ly) forward. And I am sure of our victory
with Allah's help against America and the Jews.
On July 21, 2001, a
nine-minute long edited tape was passed on to Reuters Television by a Kuwaiti
television station. The tape was made by Osama Bin-Laden and contained an
announcement which would soon be acted on with chilling results: "To all the
mujahidin: your brothers in Palestine are waiting for you, it's time to
penetrate America and Israel and hit them where it hurts most". Fifty two days
later, pilots trained by Bin Laden's al-Qa'ida organization began to crash their
hijacked planes into America.
The Western world (specifically the United
States) and Israel are being actively targeted by Koran-quoting modern jihad
warriors. Amazingly, at the same time some defenders of Islam try to protest
that these mujahidin are not real Muslims, since (they insist) Islam does not
believe in compulsion in religion (Surah 2:256). As firemen still dig through
the ruins of the WTC looking for bodies, many Americans are confused and not a
little exasperated by the mixed signals they are getting from a divided world
Islamic community, one which seems to be speaking out of two sides of its mouth
about what jihad really is.
One thing is pretty clear. It is obvious to
all that for these terrorists, jihad is not primarily self-improvement or an
internal struggle against evil desires. As the ABC News quote demonstrates,
these mujahidin back up their violent and murderous behavior with accurate
quotes from the Koran and the words of Muhammad. Only the willfully blind can
ignore the fact that at this moment in history some Muslims really are a threat
to the West, and that some of Muhammad's teachings really are a threat to all
non-Muslims.
Islamic mujahidin would strongly disagree with the remarks
which President George Bush made on September 17 2001 at the Islamic Center of
Washington, when he said, "These acts of violence against innocents violate the
fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith. And it's important for my fellow
Americans to understand that (ed. point) . . . The face of terror is not the
true faith of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These
terrorists don't represent peace. They represent evil and war. When we think of
Islam we think of a faith that brings comfort to a billion people around the
world. . .". The mujahidin's response would simply be, "Of course we represent
war! Jihad for the sake of Allah is war, but we also understand holy war to be a
fundamental tenet of the Islamic faith, of normative Islam, Muhammad's Islam,
the Koran's Islam!"
It is said that one should not try to be more
Catholic than the Pope. And far be it from non-Muslims to advocate one stream of
Islam over another. These debates over which form of Islam is 'kosher' really
should be internal Islamic debates. Nevertheless, it needs to be stressed
repeatedly that modern Islamic terrorism is not a distortion or a gross
perversion of classical Islam. The unappetizing truth is that modern Islamic
jihad terrorism is the flesh and blood grandchild of Muhammad's jihad teachings
and practices.
D. The Koran and Hadith on 'jihad'
It is now time
to consider the Koran's and the Hadith's teaching about jihad. This may help in
understanding the spiritual guidelines that radical Islamic terrorists are
following as they plan war against America, Israel and the Western world. The
contextual use of the term jihad in all of the following passages is 'armed
conflict' and 'religious war of conquest'.
The highest calling: According
to the Hadith (al-Bukhari 1:25), the highest calling a Muslim can engage in is
armed jihad: "Muhammad once was asked: 'What is the best deed for the Muslim
next to believing in Allah and his messenger?' His answer was: 'To participate
in jihad in Allah's cause'".
Every knee shall bow: Muhammad taught that
jihad warfare is the sacred duty of all Muslims. Islam must strive and fight
until the nations are forced to bow every knee to Allah. "I have been ordered to
fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but
Allah'" (al-Bukhari 4:196). This teaching is an Islamic counterfeit of Isaiah
45:23 and Philippians 2:10-11, where YHVH/Yeshua says that every knee shall bow
to Him and every tongue confess that He is Lord. The difference between Isaiah's
declaration and Muhammad's call to jihad is striking. According to Isaiah, at
the Final Judgment all mankind will stand before the God of the Bible and
acknowledge His sovereignty. But Muhammad's Allah is not content to wait; he
commands his followers 'in the now' to crush and kill all who refuse to
acknowledge Allah's supremacy. The totalitarian nature of Islam is clear -its
mandate is to conquer the entire world and force it at the point of the sword to
submit to the 'one true faith', to the dictatorship of Allah.
Against
Jews, Christians and Polytheists: This armed jihad conflict is directed against
Jews and Christians ('the people of the Book') and polytheists. "Fight them and
Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame" (Surah 9:14). "Wage
war on those who don't believe in Allah or the Last Day . . . who . . . refuse
to acknowledge the true religion (Islam), (even if they are) the people of the
Book, until they pay the jizya (poll-tax) without reservation and are totally
subjugated. The Jews claim that Uzair (Ezra?) is a son of Allah, and the
Christians say, 'The Messiah is the son of Allah'. Those are their claims which
do indeed resemble the sayings of the unbelievers of old. May Allah destroy
them! How they are deluded!" (Surah 9:29,30). How would modern atheists and
agnostics be defined in this Islamic scenario? It should be remembered that in
Muhammad's day, there were no large groups of atheists or agnostics. In
classical Islam's eyes, atheism would simply be another modern heretical form of
not believing in Allah and his prophet - and therefor not immune from the
attention of the jihad.
Order of jihad battle: What did Muhammad tell his
followers to do when jihad battle begins? "When you meet the unbelievers (in
battle), strike off their heads; then when you have made wide slaughter among
them, carefully tie up the remaining captives. Afterwards either set them free
as a favor or let them ransom (themselves) until the war terminates. Thus (you
are commanded). but if it has been Allah's will he could certainly have exacted
retribution from them (himself). But (he lets you fight) in order to test you by
means of others; and (as for Muslim fighters) those who are slain in the cause
of Allah, he will by no means allow their deeds to perish" (Surah
47:4).
Death and taxes: These above passages describe the components of
jihad: military defeat of the enemy combined with deliberate slaughter of the
opponent; enslavement or ransom if the victorious leader so desires; a fealty
bond (jizya or poll-tax) paid by Jews or Christians, indicating their acceptance
of and agreement to a humiliating near-slave status (dhimmi); death by the sword
for those who refuse to accept Islam or pay the jizya (see The Dictionary of
Islam, p. 243). This last condition also applies to Christians and Jews. "The
Jews were llowed to stay at Khaibar on condition that they would pay half the
produce of their lands to the holy Prophet in addition to the jizya" (Mishkat
2:455; later on the Jews of Khaibar were slaughtered). "If they (the enemy)
refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the jizya. If they agree to pay, accept
it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek
Allah's help and fight them" (Sahih Muslim, 4294).
Open season: The
following two stories show the treatment of Arab polytheists at the hand of
Muhammad's jihad soldiers. "Ayas b. Salamah reported on the authority of his
father: 'The apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed Abu Bakr to be
our commander and we fought with some people who were polytheists, and we
attacked them at night, killing them. Our war-cry that night was "Kill, kill!"
Salamah said: "I killed that night with my hand polytheists belonging to seven
houses" (Sunan Abu Dawud, Kitab al-Jihad 2632). "The messenger of Allah
(Muhammad) made a raid upon Banu Mustaliq while they were unaware and their
cattle were having a drink at the water. He killed those who fought and
imprisoned the others" (Sahih Muslim 4292). These jihad stories are a respected
part of 1Islam's religious tradition.
Polytheists who accept Islam can be
spared, but if they return to polytheism, they are to be destroyed. "Say to the
unbelievers (ed. polytheists): If they desist from their unbelief, what is now
past shall be forgiven them; but if they return to it, they have already before
them the doom of the ancients! Fight then against them until there is no strife
and the religion is entirely Allah's..." (Surah 8:39-42). Since Christians who
believe in the Trinity are considered polytheists by Islam, they are also
potentially fair game, and can be destroyed if battle is joined: "But when the
forbidden months are past, then fight and kill those who join other gods with
Allah wherever you may find them; capture and besiege them and lie in wait for
them with every stratagem (of war)" (Surah 9:5; cf. 2:217).
Terror and
jihad: Jihad not only involves warfare and subjugation. Terror is considered a
necessary psychological weapon to intimidate and crush all opposition. Allah
says, "I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. Therefore
strike off their heads and strike off every one of their fingertips . . . O you
who believe! when you meet those who disbelieve marching for war, then turn not
your backs to them. And whoever shall turn his back to them on that day - unless
he turn aside for the sake of fighting or withdraws to a company - then he,
indeed, becomes deserving of Allah's wrath, and his abode is hell; and an evil
destination shall it be. It is not you who slew them; it was Allah who slew
them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah who
smote, and that he might confer upon the believers a good gift from himself . .
. Strike terror (into the hearts of) the enemies of Allah and your enemies"
(Surah 8:12, 15-17, 60). These words of Allah are the spiritual catalyst which
led to the actions of the Black Tuesday terrorists.
Jihad - a harsh and
merciless calling: Muhammad taught his followers that jihad warriors need to
carry out their attacks with ferocious cruelty. "O you who believe! Fight the
unbelievers in your surroundings, and let them find harshness in you and know
that Allah is with those who guard (against evil)" (Surah 9:123). Mujahidin
(jihad warriors) are to be known for their lack of mercy in battle: "Those who
follow Muhammad are merciless to the unbelievers but kind to each other" (Surah
48:29). Those who ride forth under the banner of jihad are not to show chivalry
or love to the enemy, before his defeat or after. Rather than Yeshua's
commandment to love one's enemy, Allah commands Muslims to hate their enemies:
"O you who believe! Do not take my enemy and your enemy for friends: would you
offer them love while they deny what has come to you of the truth, driving out
the apostle and yourselves because you believe in Allah your lord? If you go
forth struggling hard (doing jihad) in my path and seeking my pleasure, would
you manifest love to them? And I know what you conceal and what you manifest;
and whoever of you does this, he indeed has gone astray from the straight path"
(Surah 60:1) Why are Muslims commanded to terrorize and slaughter their
opponents? Part of the Koranic reason is because Allah hates those who will not
accept or believe Muhammad's message. Whereas the New Testament says that "God
is not willing that any should perish, but that all may come to repentance" (2
Peter 3:9), Allah has lost patience with non-Muslims and has consigned them to
hellfire. "The Jews and Christians and the
polytheists will burn forever in
the fire of hell. They are the worst of men" (Surah 98:6). These above teachings
are messages of hate. Their spiritual author is Allah. Their physical scribe was
Muhammad.
The army of Allah: Muslims are told not to accept offers of
friendship from Jews and Christians, since the latter are probably trying to get
them to reject Islam. Offers of friendship should be met with a jihad response.
"They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you
might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they flee
(their homes) in Allah's cause; but if they turn back, then seize them and kill
them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a friend or a helper"
(Surah 4:89). Since the Koran sees mujahidin as the army of Allah, those who
reject the Koran are to be considered an anti-Islamic demonic army under the
control of Shaitan (Satan and his demons). The Koranic response to unbelievers
is one dimensional -engage in jihad and destroy the infidels! "Those who believe
fight in the cause of Allah (do jihad), and those who disbelieve fight in the
cause of the Shaitan. Fight therefore against the friends of the Shaitan; surely
the strategy of the Shaitan is weak" (Surah 4:76). Jihad is not an optional
choice for Muslims; it is a commandment. Later generations of Muslims would
argue about whether jihad is a group or individual responsibility, but the Koran
makes it clear: "Fighting is prescribed for you, though it be hateful to you"
(Surah 2:216). "And strive hard (do jihad) in the cause of Allah, a striving
that is due to him; he has chosen you and has not laid upon you a hardship in
religion -(but he has given you) the faith of your father Ibrahim (Abraham) . .
." (Surah 22:78).
Martyrdom and suicide: The Koran's perspective is that
all Muslims are slaves of Allah. Everything they are and all that they have
belongs to him, including their lives. And Allah grants jihad warriors paradise
upon martyrdom. "Truly Allah has purchased of the believers their lives and
their properties; for theirs (in return) is Paradise. They fight in his cause,
so they kill (others) and are killed . (al-Bukhari 51:1). "So narrated
Al-Mughira bin Shu'ba, 'Our prophet told us about the message of Allah that ".
whoever amongst us is killed will go to Paradise" (al-Bukhari 51:2). The focus
on martyrdom through jihad sounds strange to Western ears. Yet the suicide
bombers of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Bin Laden have drawn the world's attention
to this basic Islamic truth. Martyrdom in combat is to be greatly desired,
according to Muhammad. "So narrated Anas bin Malik, "The prophet said, "Nobody
who dies and finds good from Allah would wish to come back to this world even if
he were given the whole world and whatever is in it - except the martyr who, on
seeing the superiority of martyrdom, would like to come back to the world and
get killed again" (al-Bukhari 51:6).
According to the Koran, to avoid the
physical dangers of jihad is cowardice and a dishonor to all Muslims. It is
liable to lead to damnation for the shirkers of jihad. "If you do not fight, he
will punish you severely, and put others in your place" (Surah 9:39; see also
8:15-17). "Say to those of the dwellers of the desert who were left behind: 'You
shall soon be invited (to fight) against a people possessing mighty prowess; you
will fight against them until they submit; then if you obey, Allah will grant
you a good reward; and if you turn back as you turned back before, he will
punish you with a painful punishment'" (Surah 48:16).
It seems that some
Muslims were slow to join in the jihad journeys, and Muhammad rebukes them quite
forcefully: "O you who believe! What (excuse) have you that, when it is said to
you: 'Go forth in Allah's way (in jihad)!', you should incline heavily to earth
(ed. stay at home)? Are you contented with this world's life instead of the
hereafter? But the provision of this world's life compared with the hereafter is
but little. If you do not go forth, he will chastise you with a painful
chastisement and bring in your place a people other than you, and you will do
him no harm; and Allah has power over all things" (Surah 9:38-39). Jihad is to
continue until the sway of Islam is over all the earth and all mankind bows
before Muhammad. The first region for Muslims to conquer through jihad was
Arabia. After that, they were commanded to conquer the rest of the world for
Allah: "Make war on them until idolatry does not exist any longer and Allah's
religion reigns universally" (Surah 8:39).
The rewards of jihad: Jihad
has its own rewards. "Let those who barter the life of this world for that which
is to come, fight in the cause of Allah (do jihad); for whoever fights on
Allah's path, whether he is killed or triumphs, we will give him a handsome
reward" (Surah 4:74). That reward amounts to 80% of the booty of war, which
includes women and children. "And know that whatever thing you gain, a fifth of
it is for Allah and for the apostle and for the near of kin and the orphans and
the needy and the wayfarer - if you believe in Allah and in that which we
revealed to our servant (Muhammad), on the day of distinction, the day on which
the two parties met; and Allah has power over all things" (Surah 8:41). "Abu
Hurairah reported that the messenger of Allah said, 'To whichever village you go
and settle therein, there is your share therein, and whichever village disobeys
Allah and his messenger, its one-fifth is for Allah and his messenger, and the
remainder is for you'" (Mishkat 2:412). "Samurah bin Jundub reported the apostle
of Allah (may peace be upon him) as saying, 'Kill the old men who are
polytheists, but spare their children'" (Sunan Abu Dawud, Kitab al-Jihad
2664).
The Hadith teaches: "After the Battle of Badr, the verse dealing
with the booties was first revealed. The verse introduced the rule for the first
time that the spoils of war would be the property of the soldiers who actually
take part in the battle. Previously it went either to the coffers of the
victorious king or commander even though he did not join in the actual fight.
That is one of the reasons why the soldiers of Islam fought tooth and nail. They
would get Paradise in case of death in holy war, and booties in case of
conquest. Jihad is therefore the best source of all acquisitions" (Mishkat
II:406). Jihad privileges extended to raping women captives. "In the actual
war-field in the midst of hostilities, according to some jurists, some
concessions were sometimes given to soldiers for recreation. Captive virgin
girls in war were once made lawful for the soldiers for copulation" (Mishkat
II:440). "Abdullah (b.Masud) reported, 'We were on an expedition with Allah's
messenger (may peace be upon him) and we had no women with us . . . (Muhammad)
... then granted us permission that we should contract temporary marriage for a
stipulated period giving her a garment, and Abdullah then recited this verse,
"Those who believe do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made
lawful for you, and do not transgress. Allah does not like transgressors" (Sahih
Muslim, II:705).
Another Islamic teaching promises paradise pleasures for
the jihad warrior who dies in battle. Seventy perpetual virgin houris (dark-eyed
beautiful young women) who don't sweat or complain await him, and will be always
available for the inexhaustible mujahid. "In Paradise (al-Jannat) there are
palaces made of pearl, in each palace are seventy abodes made of rubies, in each
abode there are seventy houses of green emerald. In every house is a couch, on
every couch are seventy beds of every color, on every bed a spouse from the
houris . . . In each house there are seventy slave-girls, and every morning when
he is anxious for food the Muslim is given all that he desires besides. And
verily ... their beauty shall be as that of the moon on the night when it is
full . . .Their vessels and their combs shall be of gold and silver, and their
perspiration of musk . . . And verily every man among the people of Paradise
shall surely wed 500 houris and 4,000 virgins (Sahih al-Bukhari; Mishkat
al-Masabih under the title "Descriptions of the Garden"; see also Mizan
al-Haqq). These are the visions which pass in front of the eyes of Islamic
mujahidin - whether they be World Trade Center hijackers, young Iranian Shi'ite
men running across Iraqi minefields, or Hamas suicide bombers striding into the
crowds of Jewish shoppers in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv or Netanya.
Resolving
jihad contradictions: The Koranic evidence for jihad as an Islamic campaign of
war and conquest is overwhelming. Yet when this material is presented, some
Islamic advocates will react by presenting statements (also from the Koran, and
only a handful at that) which seem to endorse religious freedom. This creates a
certain amount of difficulty for Westerners who want clear answers as to what
Islamic jihad really is. These inconsistencies exist because the Koran itself
often has contradictory or ambivalent teachings on a subject. For instance, at
one point in Muhammad's career he was content to accept a form of polytheism
(Surah 53:19-20 - the 'Satanic verses'), to grant toleration to non-believers
(Surah 2:256), and to bow toward Jerusalem (Surah 2:142-144; see also The
Dictionary of Islam, p. 520 which quotes from Jalalu'd-Din Al Suyouti's Al Itqan
fi Ulum-il Quran: "After his flight he ordered his followers to turn [in prayer]
to the bayt al Makdas [the Temple] in Jerusalem. This, however, which was done
to conciliate the Jews, held good for six or seven months only, and then he
changed it again"). These more tolerant statements can be found in the Koran and
Hadith - next to statements which order his followers to slaughter Jews and
Christians.
What happened is simply at an earlier stage in his career
Muhammad was more tolerant in an effort to win a wider following for his new
revelations. Over time he decided to narrow his message and even received new
revelation accordingly. These decrees always moved away from toleration and
towards greater stringency. Muhammad ultimately would preach and lead
murderously violent jihad actions wherever he went. In that sense, the vast
majority of classical Islamic teachings recorded in the Koran and Hadith is
Muhammad at his harshest (see al-Bukhari 4:34-199 for grim details of Islamic
jihad activities).
At one point in his career Muhammad decreed that in
jihad, women and children are to spared, while their Christian, Jewish or
polytheistic husbands, brother and fathers are to be slaughtered: "It is
narrated by
Ibn Umar that a woman was found killed in one of these battles;
so the messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) forbade the killing of women
and children" (Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-Jihad wa'l-Siyar, 19:4320). That
concession, by the way, is not a proof of Islamic tolerance. Muhammad was
advocating violence and murder on religious grounds, acts which included the
mass slaughter of all males and the raping of the women. Yet at the same time,
another respected Islamic tradition quotes Muhammad as permitting the slaughter
of innocents. "So narrated as-Sa'b bin Jaththama, 'The prophet passed by me at a
place called al-Abwa or Waddan, and was asked whether it was permissible to
attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women
and children to danger. The prophet replied, "They are from them" (ed. Muhammad
is saying that the women and children are also pagans like their
husbands/fathers, so it is permissible to kill them). This quote is from
Bukhari, Sahih vol. 4, transl. M.M. Khan, New Delhi 1984, pp.158-59 (also Sahih
Muslim, Kitab al-Jihad wa'l-Siyar 19:4323).
Both traditions quoted above
are respected by Islamic jurists. Yet the two traditions are contradictory.
Muhammad at one point said that it was fine to murder men but not women and
children. Later on, he said that is was acceptable to murder all three. It is
simply not honest to stand up on Western television screens and pretend that
jihad is only another word for moral self-improvement, when the above-quoted
texts clearly call for world conquest and mass murder. Occasionally one can
indeed find public relations spin-doctors for Islam who try to present jihad as
non-violent and humanitarian. Here is such an example: "Thus jihad in Islam is
not an act of violence directed indiscriminately against the non-Muslims; it is
. . . not an act of mad brutality. It has its material and moral functions, i.e.
self-preservation and the preservation of the moral order in the world" (Sahih
Muslim 3:938) "... (T)he sword has not been used recklessly by the Muslims; it
has been wielded purely with humane feelings in the wider interest of humanity"
(ibid., p. 941). In light of the many Koranic verses quoted in this article on
the true nature of jihad, one is struck with a sense of unreality upon reading
these last two quotes. Are we observing selective memory, spiritual blindness,
or simply an inability to perceive the truth? Whatever the cause, the end result
of such spin for the viewer is a distorted picture of Islam.
E. Future
'jihad'
Islam sees its future in light of the past. As a result, the
person who wants to understand how Islam will influence the future of mankind,
must consider how Muslims envision their own past, present and future. My
appreciation to David Cook whose thought provoking article 'Islam and
Apocalyptic', has influenced my own thoughts in this section. Mr. Cook's article
is available through the website of Center for Millennial Studies at Boston
University at the following site:
Starting 1,400 years ago, Islam attempted to conquer the entire world,
and nearly succeeded. For over 1,000 years it held sway as the world's strongest
empire. But at present, Islam has waned in power and dwindled in influence. The
world powers (defined as 'Christian' powers by the Muslim world) of Britain,
France, USA and Russia have either directly dominated or influenced large areas
of the Middle East over the past three centuries. Not only their military
influence, but also their political influence, their cultural sway (Hollywood
and Western secular values), and their religious influence (freedom of religion,
and missionary outreach) - all have brought pollution to strict believers in
Islam and jihad, according to traditional Islamic perspective. Millions of
Muslims have been conquered by the values of the West, it is felt, and have
slacked in their commitment to Islam.
But it's not only the Christians
who are seen to be the enemies of once glorious Islam. The Jews have also
humiliated the Muslims. The State of Israel is seen by most Muslims as a hated
spearhead of Western forces and values in the Middle East. Time and again the
little Jewish state has defeated superior numbers of Islamic forces. This
shaming of Muhammad's army can only be assuaged by the total elimination of the
State of Israel, many Muslims believe.
The present disgraceful and
defeated condition of Islam cannot be due to any fault of Allah. It must be due
to the disobedience - the lack of religious purity and zeal - of the Islamic
world. According to this perspective, Allah is now giving individual Muslims the
chance to redeem themselves through a renewed commitment to Islam and to jihad
(Muhammad's burning command to conquer the world for Allah immediately prior to
the final Hour of Judgment). This time, it is believed, Islam's triumph will be
decisive and eternal.
The above perspective can be called 'Islamic
revivalism'. It sees the present world condition as paralleling the world
situation in Muhammad's day (600's AD). The mujahidin see themselves as
re-enacting the original battle between the world of Islam and the world of the
infidels (Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb). Many of the world's Islamic leaders are
also infidels (according to Islamic revivalism) - rich petroleum sheiks content
to sin and slumber while the West drains Islamic oil wells (a strategic military
gift given by Allah to Muslims to put the West in an economic and political
stranglehold).
The Islamic calendar is used by modern Islamic revivalism
to raise Muslim expectations that the Final Hour is here. This calendar (called
the hijri), takes its starting point with Muhammad's escape from Mecca on July
16, 622 AD. Islam's 14th century ended in 1979. This 'turn of the century' event
quickly took on important jihad symbolism, for two apocalyptic events occurred
in quick succession in that year - Khomeini's Islamic Revolution in Iran, and
the short-lived but violent takeover of Saudi Arabia's central mosque containing
the Ka'ba (Masjid al-Haram) in November 1979 by mujahidin. For Islamic
revivalists, the Hour of Judgment is nearly here, and jihad is now the order of
the day.
Some Muslim revivalists consider that the kickoff for this
Islamic Last Hour might have started with the Arab-Israeli wars, or perhaps with
the Gulf War. Muslim eschatology (end-times scenarios) describes the rise of an
'antichrist' figure called the 'dajjal' who is supposed to be a Jew. He will
lead a world conspiracy against Islam, spearheaded by the Christian West and by
Israel. Since it is unthinkable that Islam would lose out to Christianity in the
Final Hour, true Muslims must in the meantime resist the dajjal's influence by
resisting and destroying all Western, Christian and Jewish influences on Islamic
society - be they political, cultural or religious. The name of one of Bin
Laden's umbrella groups, the International Islamic Front for the Jihad Against
Jews and Crusaders, takes on added meaning within this eschatological (last
days) context.
Islamic revivalist writings decree that Allah will bring
natural disasters and terror acts against the West as punishment for their
corruption of Islam. When these acts of Allah's vengeance against the West
occur, they say, Muslims should be encouraged. In this context, consider the
spontaneous outbursts of joy and city-wide victory marches in Lebanon and
Palestinian areas, when news of the Black Tuesday terror attacks became known.
Islamic futurists believe that war will first be joined against the Jews in
Israel and then, after Israel's defeat, against the West. The reason Israel has
succeeded for so long, it is believed, is because the dajjal is exercising his
demonic powers through Israel and the United States to weaken and divide the
Islamic world. The worldwide spread of American culture, music, films etc.,
reflects a dajjal agenda to destroy Islam. From this perspective, one could
nearly say that the rock star Madonna, the fast food giant McDonald's, and the
seven-branched Jewish menorah (candelabrum) are all elements of the dajjal's
satanic agenda.
It is noteworthy that, during the first and second
intifadas (violent Palestinian riots against Israelis), bloodthirsty graffiti
were scrawled and street chants resounded, drawing connections between jihad
against the Jews and jihad against the Christians: "First we come for the
Saturday people (the Jews) and then for the Sunday people (the Christians)!"
These mob chants are reflecting Palestinian awareness of a jihad consciousness
and a jihad eschatology.
One Islamic strategy influenced by the above
eschatology, is the attempt to drive a wedge between the Christian West and the
Jewish state of Israel. The principle of 'divide and conquer' is older than
Machiavelli, and is part of the world strategy of Islamic terror. Islamic
revivalists and terrorists are trying to weaken and destroy Israel as a first
step. This will lead, in their minds, to weakening and destroying the West. One
of the main messages that Islamic terrorism and its fellow travelers continue to
drive home to America and the West is this, "The main reason for terror attacks
against the US is your support for Israel. End support for Israel, and we will
end attacks on you!" In this regard, it is worth meditating on the results of
the October 2001 NEWSWEEK poll which found that 58% of Americans surveyed
believe that recent Islamic terror is due to American support for
Israel.
Another pause for thought would come from Osama Bin Laden's
latest video message aired on Qatar's al-Jazeera television station on October 7
2001. "As for the United States, I say only a few words to it and its
people:
I swear by Allah who elevated the skies without pillars, that neither America
nor he who lives in it will enjoy security before we can see it as a reality in
Palestine - and not before all the infidel armies leave the land of Muhammad,
may peace be upon him". Bin Laden's aide Suleiman Abu Ghaith (a spokesman for
the al-Qa'ida group) added, "America has announced its total support for the
Zionist entity that has killed and oppressed Muslims and Arabs, and this is its
stupid policy . . . America has to know that was happened to it is a result of
this policy and it must know that if it continues this policy, then the sons of
Islam will not in any way stop waging revenge . . . The American people must
know that it bears total responsibility and what has happened to it is because
of its support for this policy".
IV. Is the West prepared for
'jihad'?
Many in the West find it nearly impossible to come to terms
with the very openly declared agenda of Islamic jihad revivalism. The
possibility of another threat to world order (of similar nature to fascism or
communism) brings fear and horror to many Westerners. "Just when we made the
world safe from Communism, now this? Crop dusters with anthrax, and nuclear
backpacks in US cities?" Many in the West don't want to live with crises, and
they hope that these crises (if left alone) will disappear.
History is
full of examples of national leaders who have played the ostrich when faced with
international emergencies. Prime Minister Chamberlain of Great Britain refused
to believe that Hitler could be a threat to Western European democracies.
Communists in Western Europe and North America refused to believe any thing bad
about Uncle Joseph Stalin. Many Israelis until recently believed that Yasir
Arafat had changed his spots and was now a peace partner in good faith. Yet the
ostrich response is widespread. At the same time as Allied troops are fighting
the Taliban and al-Qa'ida in Afghanistan, great pains are being taken by Western
'Christian' leaders to proclaim that Islam has nothing to do with Islamic
terrorists, and even (in the recent words of Prime Minister Tony Blair) to deny
that Islamic terrorists even exist. Why is it that the West does not want to
acknowledge the religious identity of its self-declared enemies?
One
reason may be that the West does not want to buy into apocalyptic scenarios. Who
wants to accept that 'life as we know it' may never be the same again? Many
Westerners consider peace and comfort as the main values in life. Anything that
will disturb those activities should be ignored, and then maybe it will go away.
But Paul's caution in 1 Thessalonians 5:3-6 is opposite: he warns that those who
desire peace and safety above all things will confront sudden destruction. We
who desire God's protection should be sober and on the lookout, Paul
says.
A second reason is that many in the West are naive when it comes to
recognizing implacable enemies - foes who want to murder, conquer and convert at
the point of the sword. That scenario sounds too 'kitsch' for most Westerners.
Most believe that everyone 'has his price', and that enemies can be bought off
with increased offers of humanitarian aid. Often the foreign policy of the West
has been strikingly similar to the words of Rodney King, "Can't we all just get
along?" Or perhaps the words of John Lennon offer quicksilver hope, whether it
be "Love is all you need" or "Imagine ... nothing to kill or die for ... imagine
all the people living life in peace". One heritage of the Woodstock Nation is
its naive inability to recognize existential threats.
A third reason
concerns those in America and Europe who are isolationist, who believe in
looking out for "Fortress America/Europe and let the rest of the world be
darned". There are those who would willingly throw Israel to the Islamic wolves
if it means an uninterrupted flow of oil for the eighteen wheelers of American
or European industry. At the same time it should be noted that prophetic voices
calling attention to upcoming jihad have been raised in the past decade. Steve
Emerson produced a television broadcast in 1995 (available in video) called
'Jihad in America', detailing how the developing international Islamic terror
network has been making inroads in America. For the most part his work was
ignored. Israeli then-Prime-Ministerial contender Benjamin Netanyahu published
Fighting Terror (Farrar, Strauss, Giroux, NY, 1995), a little heeded appeal to
the West (until Black Tuesday) to defeat terrorism before the fast closing
window of opportunity would be shut - the moment when Islamic terrorists deploy
atomic, chemical or biological weapons.
The fourth and last reason that
some leaders in the West refuse to publicly acknowledge the existence of Islamic
terror, is due to a misguided political strategy. The West wants to eradicate
Islamic terror networks, but at the same time it wants to avoid angering the
very volatile Muslim world. This explains the many recent American and British
declarations which emphasize that the Afghanistan war is not anti-Islamic, but
anti-terror. It is more important for the Western coalition to ignore the
terrorist nature of Islamic jihad and describe the Islamic faith as altogether
peaceful, than it is to expose the violent nature of jihad and lose their
tenuous and touchy Muslim allies.
At the same time the West also wants to
strengthen the hand of pro-Western Islamic elements in the Muslim world, while
weakening and invalidating anti-Western jihad forces. That is why Western
leaders continually insist that Islam is purely a religion of peace, and that
Islamic jihad warriors like Bin Laden are not really a valid statement of
Islam.
The moral problem with this strategy is twofold. First, it
confuses and blurs the spiritual discernment of the Western public. This will
make it harder to rally them when Islamic jihad really kicks into high gear.
Secondly, it plays into the hands of the Islamic jihad movement itself, whose
sleepers have infiltrated North America and Europe. Many of these sleepers
continue to operate under the cover of Islamic institutions and charities - some
which are bona fide, others which are bogus fronts which raise funds for terror
and orchestrate terror campaigns. To win the war on terrorism, it is absolutely
necessary to understand the nature of one's enemy and his strategy. To confuse
one's own forces about the enemy's strategy is to risk losing the
war.
Unless the West is willing to be ruthlessly honest in calling terror
'terror', in comprehensively uncovering terror networks in Western countries, in
not turning a blind eye to Islamic terror nests in host countries like Syria
(recently voted in as non-permanent UN Security Council member), Iran, Lebanon,
Sudan, Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan, and in not adopting a double standard when it
comes to anti-Jewish/anti-Israeli terror (by justifying or quietly rewarding
anti-Israel terrorist movements) - then the best that can be expected from
Operation Unending Freedom in Afghanistan is the lopping off of a few heads from
the many-headed Islamic terrorist hydra. But the terrorist hydra will grow new
heads, and these heads will grow back even more quickly. And these new
terrorists will be even more passionately committed to carrying out an even
harsher jihad against the 'infidel' West.
V. Prophetic
possibilities
The following is a considered opinion about what may
well happen in the near future. These thoughts are not inerrant, but are worth
considering as events unfold. It seems that the Islamic terror movement, in
conjunction with Muslim states which support an Islamic jihad agenda, will try
to escalate terror attacks against the West, inflicting civilian casualties at a
rate like nothing which has ever been seen before. This would include the use of
atomic, biological and chemical warfare against American cities. Many reliable
prophetic voices have been quietly saying these things for years. Natural
disasters in the West (from massive flooding to earthquakes and comets) will be
understood by Islam's followers to show that Allah himself is smiting the West
and fighting his own form of jihad against the 'infidels'.
Years ago, an
internationally trusted prophetic voice prophesied that Communism would one day
be revived and return to the world scene as a power to be reckoned with. This
Communism will be 'raised from the dead' to join together with Islam, having the
common goal of world conquest. Islam will be the stronger of these two powers,
and their union will have terribly evil consequences for the entire world. It
seems that these struggles will lead to the rise of the real
anti-Messiah.
In the meantime, Islam will continue to push for its short
term goal of getting America to abandon Israel. Terrorism against Western
targets, a renewed anti-Israel Arab boycott - but especially a determined Arab
oil embargo - will be its major tools. The plumb line which God will use to
divide the hearts of all the nations will be Israel. Those who stand with her in
her hour of need will be blessed and accepted by the God of Israel, while those
who abandon her and choose all other gods will be thrust out from God's presence
forever (Matt.25:31-46).
So it is no longer business as usual. The masks
are off. Pray that many in the West and in Israel will recognize the strategies
of Satan as seen in the Islamic revivalist jihad movement. There is a window of
opportunity open right now in the West as a result of the September 11 terror
attacks - a willingness to weigh and consider the potential destructiveness of
Islamic jihad, and its potential threat to Western civilization.
VI. How
shall we then respond?
Here are three areas of prayer and response to
focus on:
1. Islam: pray for, love and witness boldly to your Muslim friends learn more
about Islamic culture, history, Arabic music, food pray for the release of the
Holy Spirit revelation concerning Yeshua to Arab and Islamic leaders and
peoples.
2. Israel: pray for the peace and protection of the Jewish
people, the state of Israel, and their capital city Jerusalem (Psa. 122:6) pray
for the revelation of Messiah Yeshua to the Jewish people share your faith in
Yeshua boldly with Jewish people be ready to open your hearts and homes to
Jewish people as they begin to face worldwide persecution
3. Your own
homeland: love your country; pray for your leaders' wisdom, discernment,
protection, peace
pray for protection, repentance, revival; pray that your
country will stand by Israel and bless her share your faith and life
boldly
© Avner Boskey 2001