返回总目录
Paul's corruption in 2 Timothy 3:16

Search
and find articles and topics quickly and accurately! See different advanced ways to
search for articles on this site.
Introduction: We must first of all know that the entire Bible is corrupted and
unreliable and is mostly filled with man-made laws and corruption! GOD Almighty
Said: "`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise,
for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has
handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"
See Also Deuteronomy
31:25-29 where Moses peace be upon him predicted the
corruption/tampering of the Law (Bible) after his death.
The Book of Moses predicted that the Law (Bible)
will get corrupted. The Book of Jeremiah which came approximately 826 years after
did indeed confirm this corruption.
How can you say that the Bible has corruption in it
when Saint Paul in 2 Timothy 3:16 clearly said that "All Scripture is
God-breathed"?
Let us look the following Verse: "All Scripture is
God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in
righteousness, (From the NIV Bible, 2 Timothy 3:16)"
In the above verse, we clearly see that the entire Bible is supposed to be inspired from
GOD Almighty.
There are few problems however with this claim:
1- There is no actual "Bible". The
word "Bible" doesn't even exist in what we call today "The Bible". So
when such claim is made, it is not right for us to use it to prove the entire
"collection" was inpired from GOD Almighty.
2- Paul obviously didn't know much about the Old
Testament for claiming that it is all "God-breathed".
GOD Almighty said: "`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are
wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes
has handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)" See Also Deuteronomy 31:25-29 where Prophet
Moses peace be upon him predicted the corruption/tampering of the Law (Bible) after his
death by their own hands. See
History of Man's corruption of the Old Testament.
3- Paul who spoke 2 Timothy 3:16 had
rediculously contradicted himself, because he himself admitted before that he wasn't
always inspired by GOD Almighty himself (1 Corinthians 7:25-35). Verses 1 Corinthians 7:25-35 are today
permanantly preserved in the "Bible". If GOD Almighty indeed spoke 2 Timothy
3:16 through Paul, then He wouldn't have contradicted Himself in the Verse about the
entire Bible being His Words, while permanatly preserving Paul's personal words and
suggestions in the "Bible". This should be one solid proof that Paul was not
truthful. Anyway, many famous
Historians and Theologians before came to conclusions that Paul was not truthful.
See also Are these Paul's words or GOD Almighty's
Divine Revelations???? More examples of Paul's
contradictions and lies.
4- Most of the New Testament is nothing but
conversations between people, which are clearly not inspirations from GOD Almighty. For
instance, Paul fought with Saint Peter and accused him of being
"clearly in the
wrong" (Galatians: 2:11-12), and had a huge argument with Saint Barnabas (Acts
15:36-39). Now one must ask, did GOD for instance favor Paul over Barnabas and Peter and
inspired him the words while he was fighting with them? If so, since Peter was
"clearly in the wrong", then how about his Gospels? Wasn't every word that Peter
spoke supposedly inpired by GOD? How then could he be "clearly in the wrong"?
One of them must be in the wrong, which in either case, would also produce another
contradiction to 2 Timothy 3:16. Is Paul GOD Himself? No Christian believes in that. So
why then take everything he says including 2 Timothy 3:16 as the Words of GOD Almighty
when they contain clear contradictions in them?
See also:
Paul Versus the Disciples.
5-
The history of the Gospels in the New Testament is very unreliable according to the
commentary of the NIV Bible. The NIV Bible is one of the most used Bibles among
Christians, and is used in almost every "Bible
Search" web site. I wrote down their quotes in DARK GREEN
to prove this point. Let me show you a little example of that article:
The Book of Acts:
"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside
the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the
author was Luke."
So based on some conclusion, you're willing to die for defending the idea that the Book
of Acts was the True Word of GOD Almighty? If the book was inspired by GOD Almighty, then
how come it wasn't mentioned in the book itself to help us filter it out from the many
other "Satanic false books"? Are we sure that this book too is not a man-made
Satanic book?
After all, its just a conclusion, isn't it?
The Book of Hebrews:
"The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he
was obviously well known to the original recipients."
So because the guy was supposedly "well known (which we
don't really know that for sure anyway)", then would that give us the right to
consider his words as the Words of GOD Almighty?! I am sorry, but I don't really see
the logic behind this! The Book of Hebrews is one of the highly used Books among
Christians. I hear references from it a lot when listening to Christians preaching.
Yet, no one really knows who wrote it!. This is quite ironic, because
Christians use such highly doubtful books in their teachings as if they were the True
Living Words of GOD Almighty. I don't care what you call this, but I call it
blasphemy, because it is the most rediculous insult to GOD Almighty and His Holy Words
that I have ever seen.
I just hope you see the real cheap quality in the religion of Christianity, with all my
respect due to every Christian reader.
This article Just who were the real
authors of the Bible exposes the historical inreliability of the Gospels of the
Bible, which is extremely important when trying to claim that a discovered Letter/Book was
indeed a "Gospel" and it is the Words of GOD Almighty.
Allah Almighty said in the Noble Quran (The Muslims' Holy Scripture): "Know they not Allah Knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal?
And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book, but (see therein their own)
desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. Then woe to those who write the Book [The
Bible] with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,' To traffic with it for a
miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make
thereby. (The Noble Quran, 2:77-79)"
5- "The X-Rated Pornography in the
Bible is another proof that the Bible can not be all inpired by Allah Almighty.
Do you believe that the "Bible" contains some
Divine Inspirations in it?
Yes I do. Man can try to come up with many lies and additions to the Words of Allah
Almighty, but Allah Almighty's Words will always stand out clear from corruption. As a
Muslim, I believe that Jesus' personal quotes are the closest to the
Truth. But however, the Noble Quran is the error-free Holy Book that we all must
follow. Allah Almighty said in the Noble Quran: "We have,
without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly Guard it (from corruption). (The Noble Quran, 15:9)" Also "Nay, this is a Glorious Quran, (inscribed) in a Tablet Preserved! (The Noble Quran, (85:21-22)"
Again, please visit: Are these Paul's words or GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations????
Further sites to research:
Answering Trinity.
This section is a library that has many articles that refute Trinity, and shows in much
great details the history of man's corruption in the Bible.
Famous
Theologians and Historians believe that Paul was not truthful.
Just who were the real
authors of the Bible?
Christian Scholars refuting the status of the NT
as an inspired scripture.
Why
do Muslims believe in Jesus' personal quotes only as closest to the Truth in the Bible.
History of Man's corruption of the Old
Testament.
Send your comments.
Back to Main Page.